Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

-

Gen. 9.5 Rodzina

Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 bit
Nazwa roboczaKaby Lake GT3e
ArchitekturaGen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Potoki48 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Typ pamięciDDR3, DDR4
Pamięć współdzielonatak
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Technologia14 nm
TechnologieQuickSync
Data premiery10.07.2019
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 645GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8557U4 x 1700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8257U4 x 1400 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz

Testy

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
624 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
550 Points (1%)
113 -79%
...
417 -24%
419.6 -24%
442.5 -20%
450.5 -18%
452.3 -18%
471 -14%
493 -10%
AMD Radeon 610M
511 -7%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
539 -2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
550
552 0%
555 1%
558 1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
570 4%
577 5%
614 12%
631 15%
639 16%
650 18%
...
19434 3433%
max:
36259 6493%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
1736 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1893 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3238 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2985 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55.3     avg: 67.1     median: 67.1 (4%)     max: 78.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.2 fps (4%)
3.3 -84%
...
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
10.45 -48%
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
11 -46%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
11.4 -44%
11.97 -41%
12 -41%
14.9 -26%
15.59 -23%
16.3 -19%
19 -6%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
20.2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
21.2 5%
22 9%
22.1 9%
23.4 16%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
24 19%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
24.3 20%
AMD Radeon 540X
24.9 23%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
26.8 33%
27 34%
...
536 2553%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
69.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
101.8 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
198.3 fps (2%)
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
red legend - Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

low 1280x720
37.4  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach low.
low 1280x720
76.5  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1366x768
57.3  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach med..
low 1280x720
104.6  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Porównaj
high 1366x768
51.6  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1137.426.122.5
Dota 2 Reborn76.557.32926.9
BioShock Infinite104.66051.622.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
1
1
1
2
1

2








Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.28
log 21. 05:20:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.031s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#18 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0.013s ... 0.044s

#20 got single benchmarks 9902 +0.008s ... 0.052s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.258s ... 0.31s

#23 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.31s

#24 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.313s

#25 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.313s

#26 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.315s

#27 benchmarks composed for output. +0.138s ... 0.453s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.455s

#29 return log +0s ... 0.455s

Brak recenzji dla tej karty graficznej.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Klasa 1

Klasa 2

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 6700M
M4 32-core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 5700M *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *

Klasa 3

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
T600 Laptop GPU *
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 680M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon 660M
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro M1200
Radeon Pro 555X
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 540X *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon 610M *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Klasa 4

* lokata szacunkowa

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01- 4)