Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

-

Gen. 9.5 Rodzina

Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 bit
Nazwa roboczaKaby Lake GT3e
ArchitekturaGen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Potoki48 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Typ pamięciDDR3, DDR4
Pamięć współdzielonatak
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Technologia14 nm
TechnologieQuickSync
Data premiery10.07.2019
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 645GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8557U4 x 1700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8257U4 x 1400 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz

Testy

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
624 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
550 Points (1%)
113 -79%
...
417 -24%
419.6 -24%
442.5 -20%
450.5 -18%
452.3 -18%
471 -14%
493 -10%
AMD Radeon 610M
511 -7%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
539 -2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
550
552 0%
555 1%
558 1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
570 4%
577 5%
614 12%
631 15%
639 16%
650 18%
...
19434 3433%
max:
36259 6493%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
1736 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1893 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3238 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2985 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55.3     avg: 67.1     median: 67.1 (4%)     max: 78.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.2 fps (4%)
3.3 -84%
...
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
10.45 -48%
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
11 -46%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
11.4 -44%
11.97 -41%
12 -41%
14.9 -26%
15.59 -23%
16.3 -19%
19 -6%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
20.2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
21.2 5%
22 9%
22.1 9%
23.4 16%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
24 19%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
24.3 20%
AMD Radeon 540X
24.9 23%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
26.8 33%
27 34%
...
536 2553%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
69.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
101.8 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
198.3 fps (2%)
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
red legend - Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

low 1280x720
37.4  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach low.
low 1280x720
76.5  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1366x768
57.3  fps    + Porównaj
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach med..
low 1280x720
104.6  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Porównaj
high 1366x768
51.6  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1137.426.122.5
Dota 2 Reborn76.557.32926.9
BioShock Infinite104.66051.622.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
1
1
1
2
1

2








Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.28
log 20. 04:54:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 05:35:02 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.03s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#18 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0.015s ... 0.044s

#20 got single benchmarks 9902 +0.008s ... 0.053s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.271s ... 0.324s

#23 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.324s

#24 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.327s

#25 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.327s

#26 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.329s

#27 benchmarks composed for output. +0.15s ... 0.479s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.482s

#29 return log +0s ... 0.482s

Brak recenzji dla tej karty graficznej.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Klasa 1

Klasa 2

Radeon RX 6800S
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 8060S *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Arc 140T *
Arc 130T *
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *

Klasa 3

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
T600 Laptop GPU *
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 680M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon 660M
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro M1200
Radeon Pro 555X
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 540X *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon 610M *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Klasa 4

* lokata szacunkowa

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01- 4)