Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765

 Helio P35 MT6765

-

Nazwa roboczaCortex-A53
Seria Mediatek

Rodzina: Mediatek Cortex-A53

Mediatek Helio X10 MT67952.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 « 1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87521.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67521.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67531.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67501.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT81651.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67391.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67351.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87351.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67371.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Taktowanie1800 - 2300 MHz
Liczba rdzeni / wątków8 / 8
Technologia wytwarzania16 nm
CechyPowerVR GE8320 680MHz, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200
GPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)
64-bityobsługa 64-bitów
ArchitectureARM
Data premiery01/12/2018
Odnośnik do produktu (zewn.)www.mediatek.com

Testy

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU
0.3 pt (26%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -51%
...
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -46%
0.2028 -39%
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -30%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 0%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 24%
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 33%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 38%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 39%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
...
1.3 288%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 10689     avg: 15977     median: 17147 (14%)     max: 17853 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 766     avg: 1116     median: 1190.5 (14%)     max: 1259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 653     avg: 1096     median: 1190.5 (14%)     max: 1243 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 150     avg: 166.7     median: 168.5 (7%)     max: 173 pkt.
58 -65%
...
Rockchip RK3566
143 -14%
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
143.5 -14%
146 -12%
146.7 -12%
151 -9%
Mediatek MT8768
156 -6%
Mediatek Helio G37
160 -4%
JLQ JR510
164 -2%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
166 0%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
166.7
Mediatek Helio G35
167.2 0%
Samsung Exynos 850
167.3 0%
168 1%
169 1%
176 6%
177 6%
239 43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
251.4 51%
Mediatek Helio P60T
258.5 55%
...
2437 1362%
max:
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2555 1433%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 539     avg: 886     median: 934.5 (2%)     max: 1022 pkt.
248 -72%
...
UNISOC Tiger T310
756 -15%
Mediatek Helio A25
758 -14%
761 -14%
Mediatek MT8768
775 -13%
Mediatek Helio G35
780 -12%
797 -10%
JLQ JR510
818 -8%
823 -7%
867 -2%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
886
891 1%
Samsung Exynos 850
900 2%
924 4%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
936 6%
970 9%
Mediatek Helio P60T
1092 23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
1176 33%
Unisoc T7200
1206 36%
Mediatek MT8183
1208 36%
...
10697 1107%
max:
55811 6199%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 165     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 176 pkt.
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 915     avg: 983     median: 1002 (3%)     max: 1031 pkt.
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 776     avg: 851     median: 855 (9%)     max: 921 pkt.
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3834     avg: 4013     median: 3973 (4%)     max: 4232 pkt.
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
790 pkt. (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3542 pkt. (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3904 pkt. (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
888 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2700 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9756     avg: 10649     median: 10849 (13%)     max: 11323 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4347     avg: 4747     median: 4643 (4%)     max: 5543 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 29     avg: 32     median: 31.5 (6%)     max: 36 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7343 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 17134     avg: 23682     median: 24259.5 (20%)     max: 29075 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 19601     avg: 26565     median: 26896 (22%)     max: 32868 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 5938     avg: 10313     median: 10175.5 (2%)     max: 14962 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 42692     avg: 45071     median: 45483 (16%)     max: 46624 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 101535     avg: 105631     median: 105734 (10%)     max: 109518 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117053 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
37871 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5059 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2238     avg: 3957     median: 3956.5 (21%)     max: 5675 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 1780     avg: 4353     median: 4353 (9%)     max: 6926 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 3814     avg: 5045     median: 5290 (35%)     max: 5794 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4040     avg: 5969     median: 6001 (30%)     max: 7753 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.3 Watt (1%)
00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.82.12.32.52.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.1 Watt (1%)
00.10.10.20.30.30.40.40.50.60.60.70.80.80.9111.11.21.2Tooltip
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
red legend - Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 23. 01:23:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:30:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#25 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 11371 +0.011s ... 0.023s

#28 got single benchmarks 11371 +0.044s ... 0.067s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.528s ... 0.595s

#31 min, max, avg, median took s +0.109s ... 0.704s

#32 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.704s

#33 return log +0s ... 0.704s

Testy dla Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 procesor

Samsung Galaxy A12: PowerVR GE8320, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Zewnętrzna recenzja » Samsung Galaxy A12

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Inne procesory tej serii Mediatek

» Mediatek Helio G99
   8x 2 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G96
   8x 2 GHz - 2.05 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G95
   8x 2 GHz - 2.05 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G90T
   8x 2.05 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P90
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P70
   8x 2.1 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P65
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G88
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G85
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G80
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G70
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P60T
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P60
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek MT8788
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek MT8176
   6x 2.1 GHz
» Mediatek MT8173
   4x 2.4 GHz
» Mediatek MT8173C
   4x 2.1 GHz
» Mediatek MT6595 Turbo
   8x 2.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6595
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek MT6595M
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
   8x 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek MT8135
   4x 1.7 GHz
» Mediatek MT8752
   8x 1.7 GHz
» Mediatek MT6752
   8x 1.7 GHz
» Mediatek MT6753
   8x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6750S
   8x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6750N
   8x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6750
   8x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6750T
   8x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6592
   8x 1.7 GHz
» Mediatek MT8732
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT8165
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6739
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6739WW
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6732
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6735
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT8735
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Mediatek MT6737T
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6737
   4x 1.25 GHz
» Mediatek MT6735P
   4x 1 GHz
» Mediatek MT6735M
   4x 1 GHz
» Mediatek MT8127
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT6589T
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Mediatek MT8389
   4x 1.2 GHz
» Mediatek MT8125
   4x 1.2 GHz
» Mediatek MT8321
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Mediatek MT8121
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Mediatek MT6582
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Mediatek MT6582M
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Mediatek MT6580M
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Mediatek MT6589
   4x 1.2 GHz
» MediaTek MT8312
   2x 1.3 GHz
» MediaTek MT8377
   2x 1.2 GHz
» MediaTek MT6572
   2x 1.2 GHz
» MediaTek MT8317T
   2x 1.2 GHz
» MediaTek MT6577
   2x 1 GHz
» MediaTek MT6575
   1x 1 GHz

Porównywalne CPU

+ Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795
   8x 2.2 GHz
+ Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
+ HiSilicon Kirin 655
   8x 2.1 GHz
+ HiSilicon Kirin 650
   8x 2 GHz
+ HiSilicon Kirin 930
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.3 GHz
- Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
   8x 2.3 GHz
- Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
   8x 2 GHz
- Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
   8x 2 GHz
- Apple A7
   2x 1.3 GHz
- Intel Atom Z3570
   4x 2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01- 4)