Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

-

Quadro M Rodzina

Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 bit @ 900 MHz
Nazwa roboczaFermi
ArchitekturaFermi
Potoki336 - ZJC
Zegar rdzenia475 MHz
Zegar jednostek cieniujących950 MHz
Zegar pamięci1200 MHz
Magistrala256 bit
Typ pamięciGDDR5
Maks. pamięci2048 MB
Pamięć współdzielonanie
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Pobór prądu100 W
Technologia40 nm
TechnologieOpenGl 4.1, FP32
Wielkość laptopaduży
Data premiery22.02.2011
Witryna producentawww.nvidia.com

Testy

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2229     avg: 2335     median: 2334.5 (3%)     max: 2440 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2025     avg: 2092     median: 2092 (2%)     max: 2159 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
10722 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
17727 Points (23%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
39.1 fps (30%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.4 fps (39%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
42.1 fps (45%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
36.5 fps (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
46 fps (15%)
- Zakres wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficznej
red legend - Średnia wartość wyników testów referencyjnych dla tej karty graficzne
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Testy gier

Zamieszczone niżej wyniki pochodzą z testów zrecenzowanych laptopów. Należy pamiętać, że osiągi poszczególnych konfiguracji zależą od zastosowanej pamięci własnej karty (VRAM), zegarów karty (mogą być różne), procesora, ustawień systemu, sterowników i wersji systemu operacyjnego. Tym samym uzyskane wyniki nie muszą być reprezentatywne dla wszystkich laptopów wyposażonych w daną kartę graficzną. By uzyskać szczegółowe informacje o wynikach testów, należy kliknąć na podaną wartość liczbową (fps, czyli kl/s).

low 1024x768
180  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1360x768
112  fps    + Porównaj
high 1360x768
79  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
173  fps    + Porównaj
ultra 1280x1024
62  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach ultra.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
279  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1024x768
165  fps    + Porównaj
high 1280x1024
79  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
188  fps    + Porównaj
med. 1024x768
148  fps    + Porównaj
high 1280x1024
117  fps    + Porównaj
» Na wszystkich testowanych laptopach grywalna przy ustawieniach high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
StarCraft 21801127971
Anno 140417362
Sims 327916579
Racedriver: GRID188148117
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



4


1
2


3


2






Więcej informacji w rankingu płynności w grach

v1.28
log 01. 16:25:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Feb 2025 05:35:31 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.03s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.033s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#23 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.033s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 2431 +0.014s ... 0.047s

#25 got single benchmarks 2431 +0.01s ... 0.058s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.355s ... 0.413s

#28 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.413s

#29 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.415s

#30 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.415s

#31 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.416s

#32 benchmarks composed for output. +0.123s ... 0.54s

#33 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.542s

#34 return log +0s ... 0.542s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Klasa 1

Klasa 2

Radeon RX 6800S
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 8060S *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Arc 140T *
Arc 130T *
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *

Klasa 3

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
T600 Laptop GPU *
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 680M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon 660M
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro M1200
Radeon Pro 555X
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon 540X *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon 610M *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Klasa 4

* lokata szacunkowa

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-07-17)