Recenzja Razer Blade 15 OLED (początek 2022 roku): Kompaktowy laptop do gier z RTX 3070 Ti

Name: Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Brand: Razer

Ponownie polerowane.

Obecne wcielenie Blade 15 nadal opiera się na mocnym sprzęcie Alder Lake i Ampere, ale oferuje również kuszącą aktualizację: Razer postawił na wyświetlacz OLED o wysokim kontraście (QHD), z wysoką częstotliwością odświeżania (240 Hz) i doskonałym pokryciem przestrzeni barw.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/03/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Razer Blade 15 (Early 2022) ma ambicje być laptopem zarówno dla graczy, jak i kreatywnych użytkowników. Na pokładzie znajduje się odpowiedni sprzęt: Core i9-12900HpROCESOR, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU do laptopa i dokładny pod względem kolorów wyświetlacz OLED (QHD). Podobnych kompaktowych konkurentów można znaleźć w postaci m.in Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), tj.Aorus 15 XE5,HP Omen 16, oraz.Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Informacje dotyczące obudowy, funkcji, urządzeń wejściowych i głośników są już pod ręką w naszej recenzji jego rodzeństwa, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Ten ostatni wyposażony jest w panel LED (QHD) - najistotniejsza różnica względem obecnego urządzenia.

Test device courtesy of Razer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)

Procesor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 1035 MHz, pamięć: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus

Pamięć

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)

Matryca

15.60 cali 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pikseli 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, refleksująca: tak, 240 Hz

Chipset

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Dysk twardy

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB wolne miejsce

Złącza

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, czytnik kart: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235

Akumulator

80 Wh, 5209 mAh litowo-jonowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.01 kg, zasilacz: 790 g

Cena

3249 Euro

Odnośniki

Razer strona producenta

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.9 % v7 ^(old)	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	12/2022	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.4 % v7 ^(old)		SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	21.65 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
85.5 % v7 ^(old)		HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440

Porównanie wielkości

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Aorus 15 XE5 SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) DIN A4 ❌

Prawa strona: Czytnik kart pamięci (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, gniazdo na blokadę kabli

Lewy bok: Złącze zasilania, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), łączone gniazdo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	165.4 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s +71%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years)	95.7 MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s +116%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years)	119.6 MB/s +42%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1528 (1341^min - 1654^max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz ()	1160 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1470 (1448^min - 1522^max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz ()	1470 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1692 (1588^min - 1709^max) MBit/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1664 (1336^min - 1741^max) MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1465 - 1762, n=5)	1628 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=70, last 2 years)	1489 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1612 (817^min - 1646^max) MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1477 (1339^min - 1623^max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=9)	1418 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)	1387 MBit/s -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s -35%

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)

ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - mobilny komputer Razera przynosi ze sobą panel OLED

Wyświetlacz OLED oferuje te same kluczowe dane, co jego rodzeństwo z wyświetlaczem LED: Rozdzielczość 2560 x 1440 pikseli (QHD) przy częstotliwości odświeżania 240 Hz i przekątną 15,6 cala.

Typowo dla OLED-ów, panel zdobywa punkty za wspaniałe poziomy czerni i szybki czas reakcji. Do tego dochodzi stosunkowo wysoka jasność maksymalna. Jest to coś, do czego jego LED-owy odpowiednik nie może się przyczepić.

Słabe strony panelu OLED: Ma on błyszczącą powierzchnię i migocze przy ustawieniu jasności na poziomie ≤ 70 procent z częstotliwością 500 Hz. Technicznie uwarunkowane migotanie jest związane z regulacją jasności panelu. Pod tym względem, matowa, niemigocząca dioda LED matowy, niemigoczący panel LED ma nosa do przodu.


385 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	387 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

Samsung ATNA562P02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 387 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 99 %
na akumulatorze: 381 cd/m²
kontrast: 12767:1 (czerń: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Display		-6%	-4%	-20%	-17%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	97.6	92.8 -5%	95.2 -2%	67.3 -31%	71 -27%	99.1 2%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	98.5 -1%	99.9 1%	96.7 -3%	97.9 -2%	99.9 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94	83.1 -12%	84.5 -10%	68.2 -27%	73.3 -22%	86.8 -8%
Response Times		-340%	-475%	-365%	-498%	-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2) -280%	14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5) -620%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -625%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -620%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	10 ?(4.6, 5.4) -400%	8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5) -330%	7 ?(3.3, 3.7) -250%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) -370%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%
PWM Frequency	500 ?(70)
Screen		-96%	-169%	-178%	-184%	-106%
Brightness middle	383	497 30%	336 -12%	326 -15%	335 -13%	286 -25%
Brightness	384	481 25%	316 -18%	303 -21%	319 -17%	271 -29%
Brightness Distribution	99	82 -17%	89 -10%	89 -10%	90 -9%	89 -10%
Black Level *	0.03	0.21 -600%	0.34 -1033%	0.33 -1000%	0.28 -833%	0.25 -733%
Contrast	12767	2367 -81%	988 -92%	988 -92%	1196 -91%	1144 -91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.89	3.53 -87%	3.36 -78%	2.73 -44%	4.38 -132%	2.74 -45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.76	6.15 -64%	6.67 -77%	9.54 -154%	9.48 -152%	5.21 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.67	3.53 -32%	0.74 72%	1.36 49%	1.33 50%	2.52 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.26	1.74 -38%	4.7 -273%	5.2 -313%	7 -456%	1.1 13%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.2 ^100%	2.244 ^98%	2.074 ^106%	2.103 ^105%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6386 ^102%	6418 ^101%	6897 ^94%	6911 ^94%	6244 ^104%	6408 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-147% / -112%	-216% / -177%	-188% / -171%	-233% / -193%	-219% / -147%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Nawet po wyjęciu z pudełka wyświetlacz zapewnia imponujące odwzorowanie kolorów: Przy odchyleniu 1,9 cel (DeltaE < 3) jest wyraźnie spełniony. Kalibracja nie prowadzi do żadnej poprawy. Dokładność kolorów podano: Przestrzenie barw sRGB i DCI-P3 są odwzorowywane całkowicie i prawie całkowicie, przy czym przestrzeń barw AdobeRGB na poziomie 94 procent. Na stronie panel LED rodzeństwa również zapewnia podobnie dobre wyniki.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

500 Hz

≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Panel charakteryzuje się dużą stabilnością kątów widzenia i jest czytelny pod każdym kątem. Na zewnątrz jest to jednak trudne ze względu na błyszczącą, odbijającą światło powierzchnię wyświetlacza.

Wydajność - Blade 15 jest oparty na Alder Lake i Ampere

Dzięki Blade 15 (początek 2022 roku) Razer ma w swojej ofercie laptopa przeznaczonego do gier w rozdzielczości QHD (ustawienia wysokie do maksymalnych), ale także świetnie radzi sobie w takich dziedzinach jak edycja i renderowanie wideo. Recenzowany tu model można mieć za około 1 967 dolarów.

Warunki badania

Możliwe jest przełączanie się pomiędzy trzema trybami wydajności ("Balanced", "Silent" i "User-defined") za pomocą kombinacji klawiszy "Fn" + "P". Profil "User-defined" pozwala na ustawienia subpresetów dla CPU ("Low", "Medium", "High", "Boost") i GPU ("Low", "Medium" i "High") - poprzez preinstalowane oprogramowanie Razer Synapse. W trybie bateryjnym dostępny jest tylko profil "Balanced".

Benchmarki przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem aktywnego trybu "User-defined" przy maksymalnych ustawieniach (podprogramy "Boost" i "High"). Do testu akumulatora wykorzystano profil "Silent".

Procesor

Na stronie .Core i9-12900Hprocesor (Alder Lake) składa się z sześciu rdzeni wydajnościowych (hyperthreading, 2,5 do 5 GHz) i ośmiu rdzeni efektywnościowych (bez hyperthreadingu, 1,8 do 3,8 GHz). W sumie jest 20 logicznych rdzeni procesora.

Test wielowątkowy benchmarku Cinebench R15 był przetwarzany z częstotliwością 3,6 do 3,8 GHz (rdzenie P) i 2,8 do 2,9 GHz (rdzenie E). Test jednowątkowy przeprowadziliśmy odpowiednio przy 1,4 do 4,5 GHz (rdzenie P) i 1,5 do 3,5 GHz (rdzenie E). W trybie akumulatorowym taktowania są niższe. Pokazuje to test pętli CB15: Obciążenie wielowątkowe jest konfrontowane z wysoką prędkością zegara turbo tylko przez krótki czas. Po 30-40 sekundach wartości te spadają do mniej więcej bazowego taktowania.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)

Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy pętli CB15 (Max)

Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Balanced)

Prędkości zegara procesora podczas pracy w pętli CB15 (Silent)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	83.8 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	74.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	73.8 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	70.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	69.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	67.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	66.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	52.4 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=191, last 2 years)	21701 Points +39%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16170 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=28)	15133 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	14893 (13078^min - 14893.1^max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	10742 Points -31%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)	1880 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1930, n=28)	1829 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1796 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1759 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1515 Points -12%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=189, last 2 years)	8258 Points +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points +1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	6044 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5731 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=28)	5717 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	4148 Points -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=189, last 2 years)	722 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=28)	706 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	690 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	683 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	580 Points -12%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=196, last 2 years)	3402 Points +34%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	2711 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=28)	2454 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	2178 (2061.43^min - 2178.41^max) Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1547 Points -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=193, last 2 years)	277 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=29)	262 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	258 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	229 Points -8%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	309 Seconds * -40%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	236 Seconds * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=28)	231 Seconds * -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	226 Seconds * -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds * +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * +17%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=184, last 2 years)	171.9 Seconds * +22%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=188, last 2 years)	84837 MIPS +33%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	61936 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=28)	60849 MIPS -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	58296 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47298 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=188, last 2 years)	6286 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS +15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=28)	5843 MIPS +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	5739 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5726 MIPS +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	5492 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=189, last 2 years)	14925 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	12832 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	12434 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=31)	11913 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	8261 Points -32%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=189, last 2 years)	1885 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1897, n=31)	1800 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1758 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1728 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1579 Points -5%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=188, last 2 years)	23.4 fps +35%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	17.2 fps -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=28)	17.1 fps -1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.2 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	12.8 fps -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	51.5 s * -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47.5 s * +6%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=185, last 2 years)	47.5 s * +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=28)	42.4 s * +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s * +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * +19%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	37.5 s * +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	0.557 sec * -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec *
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4715 sec * +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4647 sec * +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28)	0.454 sec * +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * +11%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=189, last 2 years)	0.4399 sec * +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec * +13%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2543 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

213 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

662 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6007 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1721 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15600 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	97.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	78.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	72.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	68.6 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	68.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	64.6 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55.7 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=185, last 2 years)	21686 KRay/s +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12736 KRay/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	12680 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=28)	11191 KRay/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7671 KRay/s -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=185, last 2 years)	106189 Points +48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63698 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	61649 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=28)	55458 Points -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36695 Points -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=185, last 2 years)	4862 MB/s +43%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4107 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=28)	3048 MB/s -10%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3023 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2681 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=185, last 2 years)	116446 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points -1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102811 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=28)	100462 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93492 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86848 Points -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=185, last 2 years)	13194 Points +36%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9205 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=28)	9016 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	8872 Points -9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8654 Points -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=185, last 2 years)	53500 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37197 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31084 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=28)	28667 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21312 Points -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	135380 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s +30%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113172 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=185, last 2 years)	109209 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=28)	85711 MB/s -14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55775 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=185, last 2 years)	1352 MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=28)	932 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	928 MB/s -13%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	860 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	690 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=185, last 2 years)	11679 KRay/s +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6946 KRay/s -4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6843 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=28)	6205 KRay/s -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4173 KRay/s -43%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40992 MPixel/s +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=186, last 2 years)	39997 MPixel/s +16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=29)	36660 MPixel/s +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	35065 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	26692 MPixel/s -23%

Wydajność systemu

System działa płynnie i niezawodnie oraz zapewnia wystarczającą moc dla wymagających obszarów zastosowań, takich jak renderowanie, edycja wideo i gry. Transfery pamięci RAM są na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5-4800, a dopełnieniem tego są dobre wyniki PC-Mark.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dual-channel.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)	7775 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7706 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7695 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6126 Points -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years)	10833 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10764 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10708 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9544 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10352 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years)	9877 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9581 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8571 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	12104 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years)	12039 Points +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11099 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7627 Points -26%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1947 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=149, last 2 years)	1900 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1656 Points -4%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1887 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=149, last 2 years)	1802 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1640 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=149, last 2 years)	2085 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1983 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1692 Points -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2022 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=149, last 2 years)	1698 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1600 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5101 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5789 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score		7336 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=185, last 2 years)	65054 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62522 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=28)	58945 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	50524 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48120 MB/s -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=185, last 2 years)	68795 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65933 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=28)	61718 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	57551 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48849 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=185, last 2 years)	66829 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66074 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=28)	59318 MB/s +2%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58294 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46056 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns *
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.1 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=185, last 2 years)	94.2 ns * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94 ns * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns * +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=27)	85.7 ns * +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienia DPC

Standardowy test monitora latencji (surfowanie po internecie, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) wykazał anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą jednak doprowadzić do poprawy lub pogorszenia wydajności.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3261 μs * -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1364 μs * -46%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1109.7 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * +23%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Pamięć masowa

Blade ma miejsce na dwa dyski SSD PCIe-4 w formacie M.2 2280. Zainstalowany dysk SSD PCIe-4 (1 TB) od Samsunga zapewnia bardzo dobre transfery. Spadki wydajności spowodowane throttlingiem termicznym nie występowały.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	91.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	83.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	78.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	75.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	70.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4199 (4194.93^min - 4199.13^max) MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4119 (4098.66^min - 4118.81^max) MB/s +16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4117 (3552.16^min - 4116.81^max) MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1761 - 4677, n=85)	3764 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=166, last 2 years)	3477 MB/s -2%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4299 (4288.86^min - 4298.95^max) MB/s +22%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4236 (3477.46^min - 4236.46^max) MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4167 (4120.63^min - 4166.62^max) MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=166, last 2 years)	3794 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2220 - 4564, n=85)	3578 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7020 (5888.98^min - 7020.02^max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6921 (6631.14^min - 6921.02^max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6847 (6590.72^min - 6846.78^max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (3421 - 7100, n=85)	6477 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=166, last 2 years)	6320 MB/s -5%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4999 (4982.73^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=166, last 2 years)	4842 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2216 - 5281, n=85)	4814 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4740 (4542.15^min - 4740.19^max) MB/s -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4421 (4173.33^min - 4420.8^max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	80.6 (67.84^min - 80.61^max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	79.6 (78.85^min - 79.63^max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	77.9 (77.66^min - 77.9^max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)	76.7 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=166, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s -19%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	333 (331.94^min - 333.25^max) MB/s +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	256 (23.49^min - 256.28^max) MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	239 (238.19^min - 238.82^max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=166, last 2 years)	221 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (49.9 - 280, n=85)	188.5 MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4309 (4179.96^min - 4309.38^max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3566 (3562.85^min - 3566.11^max) MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3184 (3180.75^min - 3183.86^max) MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 (2482.75^min - 2854.87^max) MB/s -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (376 - 4185, n=85)	2579 MB/s -38%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=166, last 2 years)	2553 MB/s -39%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3600 (3594.9^min - 3599.81^max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3435 (2876.62^min - 3435.27^max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2694 (2561.51^min - 2693.92^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2141 (2137.08^min - 2141.26^max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=166, last 2 years)	2112 MB/s -40%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (291 - 3559, n=85)	1957 MB/s -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s -83%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9117 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8376 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7659 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7180 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6864 Points -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=85)	6855 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=157, last 2 years)	6729 Points -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5985 Points -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3576 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3431 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3123 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2858 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2562 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=157, last 2 years)	2440 Points -15%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (983 - 3469, n=85)	2417 Points -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1994 Points -30%
Score Write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3814 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3723 Points +28%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (921 - 4043, n=85)	3272 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=157, last 2 years)	3106 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3093 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2953 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2916 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2563 Points -12%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5750 MB/s +24%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	5592.23 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5396.69 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5171.96 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=157, last 2 years)	4939 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2638 - 5621, n=85)	4891 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4623.95 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3388 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4240 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4073 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3881.37 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=157, last 2 years)	3737 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3551.32 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1617 - 4526, n=85)	3320 MB/s -7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3311.86 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2667.04 MB/s -25%
4K Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	106.98 MB/s +77%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	73.81 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)	72.4 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	67.2 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	66.29 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=157, last 2 years)	65 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	60.3 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	52.1 MB/s -14%
4K Write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	289.15 MB/s +57%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	247.26 MB/s +34%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	221.3 MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=157, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	205 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	189.98 MB/s +3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (118.6 - 246, n=85)	186 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	183.9 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2909.44 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2789 MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2539.3 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2335.71 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2171 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=157, last 2 years)	1875 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (421 - 2854, n=85)	1855 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1380.56 MB/s -41%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3193.44 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3144.88 MB/s +32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (367 - 3451, n=85)	2754 MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2579.14 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=157, last 2 years)	2524 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2376.83 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2324 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1934 MB/s -19%
Access Time Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.083 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.07 ms * +16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.056 ms * +33%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=156, last 2 years)	0.05537 ms * +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.052 ms * +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.045 ms * +46%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)	0.03777 ms * +54%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.023 ms * +72%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.058 ms * -164%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=157, last 2 years)	0.04852 ms * -121%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)	0.03406 ms * -55%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.022 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.022 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.02 ms * +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.016 ms * +27%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.013 ms * +41%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6602 (5678.43-6643.28)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø4741 (3891.45-4949.7)

Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø7001 (6418.71-7045.97)

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6780 (6489.82-6797.74)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø6496 (1637.54-6888.72)

Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6887 (6595.77-6910.33)

Karta graficzna

Na stronie .GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU do laptopa (VRAM: 8192 MB GDDR6) zapewnia wyniki w 3D-Marku na średnim poziomie wyznaczonym do tej pory przez GPU, a uwagę zwraca stosunkowo niskie maksymalne TGP na poziomie 110 W. Bezpośrednie wyjście obrazu przez GPU GeForce prowadzi do nieistotnego wzrostu wydajności graficznej. Przełączanie pomiędzy trybem Optimus i dGPU odbywa się bezpośrednio w BIOS-ie lub za pośrednictwem oprogramowania Razer Synapse. Zaawansowany Optimus nie jest obsługiwany.

Fire Strike (zasilanie ścienne, zrównoważone)

Fire Strike (tryb bateryjny, zrównoważony)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	98.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	90.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	87 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	85.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	85.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83.8 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	82.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	79.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	77.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=184, last 2 years)	43666 Points +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	37438 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	37151 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	36023 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (13799 - 42569, n=36)	35944 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	35719 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	34141 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	32236 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	32235 Points -11%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	153993 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	153719 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	145558 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144658 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)	143183 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	141689 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	137434 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (33126 - 181005, n=25)	130456 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31337 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	28601 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	28374 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22612 - 32550, n=37)	27554 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	27309 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	27183 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	25891 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	24766 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	24618 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13077 Points +29%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	11071 Points +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	10623 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (8142 - 12324, n=37)	10478 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	10357 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	10157 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9980 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	9421 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	9048 Points -11%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		48871 pkt.
3DMark 11 Performance		30645 pkt.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		59982 pkt.
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23793 pkt.
3DMark Time Spy Score		10342 pkt.
Pomoc

... porównanie

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	28 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	26 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)	26 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22 - 30, n=15)	25.3 Seconds * +3%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)	24 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=175, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	45 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	45 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)	44 Seconds * +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 46, n=16)	41.4 Seconds * +8%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)	40 Seconds * +11%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=181, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	559 Seconds * -49%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)	404 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)	378 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	376 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (285 - 459, n=16)	376 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	329 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=189, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +21%

GPUScore: Sacred Path
2560x1440 Official VRS
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)	134.8 (63.1^min, 116.3^P1 - 196.8^max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)	17.9 (14.8^min, 14.9^P1 - 27.9^max) fps -87%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)	134.8 (63.1^min, 116.3^P1 - 196.8^max) fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12. dGPU)	132.1 (111.8^min, 113.5^P1 - 195.7^max) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (6.89 - 305, n=233, last 2 years)	129.1 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (17.9 - 134.8, n=4)	104.9 fps -22%
2560x1440 Official
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)	130.6 (107.4^min, 111.4^P1 - 183.5^max) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12, dGPU)	122.4 (103.4^min, 104.7^P1 - 186.3^max) fps -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)	129.4 (23^min, 110^P1 - 180.4^max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)	17 (14.2^min, 14.3^P1 - 25.6^max) fps -87%
Average of class Gaming (2.34 - 291, n=307, last 2 years)	124.3 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (1.0.0 Vulkan 1.3)	115.7 (58.1^min, 92.3^P1 - 149.7^max) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (17 - 130.6, n=6)	107.2 fps -17%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	128448 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=191, last 2 years)	126219 Points +8%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	123594 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (100630 - 150471, n=38)	121784 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	116873 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	110844 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	109157 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	108536 Points -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	107175 Points -8%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	86126 Points
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=122, last 2 years)	72060 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (52594 - 92020, n=10)	67737 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	64974 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	61835 Points

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	96149 Points +403%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (19109 - 96149, n=2)	57629 Points +202%
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points +151%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	19109 Points
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	104147 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (103225 - 104147, n=2)	103686 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	103225 Points -1%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)	2190 mpaths +48%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)	1834 mpaths +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1334 - 1847, n=15)	1570 mpaths +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)	1480 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)	1471 mpaths -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)	1455 mpaths -2%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)	1574 mpaths +30%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)	1378 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1062 - 1391, n=14)	1261 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)	1214 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)	1210 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)	1194 mpaths -2%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=118, last 2 years)	15089 mpaths +46%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)	10826 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)	10360 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H (5.0.1)	10193 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (2880 - 11931, n=20)	9832 mpaths -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)	9590 mpaths -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)	7572 mpaths -27%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)	703 mpaths +58%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	558 mpaths +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (277 - 559, n=33)	465 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )	456 mpaths +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	445 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)	435 mpaths -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	399 mpaths -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	398 mpaths -11%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)	21409 ksamples +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	18763 ksamples +20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)	16498 ksamples +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	16474 ksamples +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	15575 ksamples
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (4722 - 19786, n=33)	15523 ksamples 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	14684 ksamples -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )	11804 ksamples -24%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 231, n=26, last 2 years)	38.1 fps +87%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	20.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (19.9 - 20.4, n=2)	20.2 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	18.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=26, last 2 years)	40.8 fps +23%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	33.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (32.1 - 33.1, n=2)	32.6 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	32 fps -3%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=25, last 2 years)	421 fps +26%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	334 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	334 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	285.6 fps -14%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=26, last 2 years)	48.7 fps +106%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (23.6 - 23.8, n=2)	23.7 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	23.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	23.4 fps -1%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=26, last 2 years)	108.9 fps +15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	95 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	85.6 fps -10%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=26, last 2 years)	74.2 fps +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	65.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (63.6 - 65.5, n=2)	64.5 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	59.6 fps -9%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=26, last 2 years)	127.4 fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	104.8 fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	98.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (95.6 - 98.5, n=2)	97 fps -2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Wydajność w grach

Laptop jest przeznaczony do gier w rozdzielczości QHD na ustawieniach wysokich do maksymalnych. Wyższe rozdzielczości byłyby możliwe po podłączeniu do odpowiedniego monitora - choć na niekiedy obniżonych ustawieniach. Liczba klatek na sekundę w testowanych tytułach jest na poziomie typowym dla ustalonego średniaka RTX 3070 Ti. Bezpośrednie wyjście obrazu przez GPU GeForce może prowadzić - w zależności od gry - do minimalnego wzrostu liczby klatek na sekundę.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91.1 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	86.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	84.8 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	84.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	82.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	76.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years)	127.4 fps +32%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	107.2 (99^min) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (76.8 - 124.1, n=39)	102.4 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100.1 (21.9^min, 25.6^P0.1, 52.5^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.7 (83^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	97.7 (84^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	96.4 (82^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	91.8 (38.7^min, 41.3^P0.1, 60.8^P1) fps -5%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118 (4.44^min, 76.9^P1) fps +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115.6 (3.67^min, 83.3^P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	113.7 (33.2^min, 76.9^P1) fps +1%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.1 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (16.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	110.2 (10.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.1 (4.18^min, 76.9^P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 123.9, n=36)	106.7 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	100 (16.4^min, 66.7^P1) fps -12%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years)	119.3 fps +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	106 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	104.6 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU)	103.8 fps +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	100.3 fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.6 (59^min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (49.5 - 122.4, n=35)	98.5 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	94.8 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)	93.8 fps -6%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=180, last 2 years)	228 fps +31%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	188.5 (48.7^min, 134^P1) fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	184 (33.3^min, 131^P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (109 - 221, n=37)	179.9 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU)	175.9 (41.6^min, 131.7^P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	173.4 (30.1^min, 131.1^P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	165.6 (39.1^min, 131.2^P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	163.8 (35.9^min, 125.2^P1) fps -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	146.6 (72.6^min, 102.4^P1) fps -15%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	160.5 (140.4^min) fps +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (135.1^min) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=188, last 2 years)	149.4 fps +12%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	145.2 (127.1^min) fps +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	140.8 (121.1^min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (68.7 - 160.5, n=38)	135.6 fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	134.9 (115.1^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	133 (114.4^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	125.3 (106.2^min) fps -6%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115 fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.5 fps +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	110 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)	107.3 fps +13%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105.3 fps +11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	100.8 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (51.6 - 116.9, n=37)	95.5 fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86.8 fps -9%

Aby sprawdzić, czy liczba klatek na sekundę pozostaje stabilna przez dłuższy czas, uruchomiliśmy grę "The Witcher 3" przez około 60 minut w rozdzielczości Full HD i maksymalnych ustawieniach jakości. Postać w grze nie była poruszana i nie było zauważalnego spadku liczby klatek na sekundę.

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.3 (87-96)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91 (74-97)

Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø100.3 (92-105)

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø90.6 (86-94)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø96.2 (88-100)

Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø102.3 (87-111)

Analiza GPU podczas testu Witcher 3 (Max)

Analiza GPU podczas testu Witcher 3 (Max, dGPU)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	182.7	177.2	172.8	113	94.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	365.8	288.5	176.6	96.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	162	148.2	143.4	133
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	174.2	133.3	100.3		75.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	133.3	121.6	95
Far Cry 5 (2018)	170	141	135	126	100
Strange Brigade (2018)	351	240	197.2	173.4	130.9
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)	124.8	97.8	70.2	52.2	41.3
F1 22 (2022)	203	202	173.1	65.2	42.3
FIFA 23 (2022)					104.3
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	101.6	84	73.3	62.9	50.5
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022)	78	75.2	71.8	69.3	56.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)	126	112	89	85	63
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022)	107	102.6	94.9	93.2	69.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022)	117	99.3	71	70.7	52.8
Need for Speed Unbound (2022)	112.8	106.9	93	84.6	66.7
High On Life (2023)	175.7	139.4	117.5	97.1	60.8
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023)	174.4	149.6	81.3	71.4	47.4
Dead Space Remake (2023)	82.1	74.6	68.1	66.8	47.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	88.5	79	69.7	59.3	42.6

Emisja - laptop Razer nie nagrzewa się nadmiernie

Emisja hałasu

W sumie, jak na laptop do gier, poziom hałasu jest umiarkowany. W stanie bezczynności i w codziennym użytkowaniu (biuro i internet) wentylatory pracują na niskich obrotach i są praktycznie niesłyszalne. Pod pełnym obciążeniem (stress test, Witcher 3 test) poziom ciśnienia akustycznego może wzrosnąć do 43,9 dB (A). Profil wydajności "Silent" nie robi tego, co sugerowałaby nazwa, ale udaje mu się obniżyć hałas w tle - kosztem mocy obliczeniowej.

Hałas

luz		28 / 28 / 28 dB
obciążenie		38.5 / 43.9 dB

	30 dB cichy 40 dB(A) słyszalny 50 dB(A) irytujący
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Noise		-10%	-6%	-5%	-16%	-4%
off / environment *	26	23 12%	24 8%	26 -0%	26 -0%	25.4 2%
Idle Minimum *	28	23 18%	26 7%	26 7%	30 -7%	26.2 6%
Idle Average *	28	24 14%	28 -0%	28 -0%	31 -11%	26.2 6%
Idle Maximum *	28	47 -68%	30 -7%	31 -11%	33 -18%	28.4 -1%
Load Average *	38.5	47.91 -24%	48 -25%	45 -17%	49 -27%	44.7 -16%
Load Maximum *	43.9	50.25 -14%	52 -18%	48 -9%	57 -30%	51.9 -18%
Witcher 3 ultra *		48.91	52	46	53	44.7

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Temperatura

W codziennym użytkowaniu (biuro, internet) temperatury obudowy utrzymują się bardzo mocno w zielonej strefie. Pod obciążeniem (stress test, Witcher 3 test) laptop nagrzewa się zauważalnie, ale nie nadmiernie.

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


42.9 °C	49.5 °C	40.9 °C
32.2 °C	45.5 °C	30.9 °C
36.5 °C	34.4 °C	32.9 °C

maks. w ogóle: 49.5 °C
średnia: 38.4 °C


44.3 °C	47.5 °C	41 °C
34.7 °C	45.7 °C	38.1 °C
37.4 °C	41.2 °C	36.1 °C

maks. w ogóle: 47.5 °C
średnia: 40.7 °C

zasilacz 55.8 °C | temperatura otoczenia 24.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


29.8 °C	33.4 °C	31.2 °C
28 °C	31.1 °C	27.6 °C
30.4 °C	29.2 °C	28.9 °C

maks. w ogóle: 33.4 °C
średnia: 30 °C


34.3 °C	35 °C	34.1 °C
30.9 °C	33.5 °C	30.4 °C
30.5 °C	32.4 °C	33 °C

maks. w ogóle: 35 °C
średnia: 32.7 °C

zasilacz 33.4 °C | temperatura otoczenia 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


44.3 °C	50.4 °C	41.1 °C
41.8 °C	46.8 °C	30.5 °C
38 °C	34.9 °C	34.9 °C

maks. w ogóle: 50.4 °C
średnia: 40.3 °C


46.1 °C	48.1 °C	42.1 °C
39.8 °C	49.7 °C	38.1 °C
37.2 °C	43 °C	40.1 °C

maks. w ogóle: 49.7 °C
średnia: 42.7 °C

zasilacz 51.9 °C | temperatura otoczenia 22.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

Górna część dystrybucji ciepła (obciążenie)

Górna część dystrybucji ciepła (Witcher 3)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		2%	-12%	-15%	9%	-6%
Maximum Upper Side *	49.5	52 -5%	46 7%	52 -5%	41 17%	50 -1%
Maximum Bottom *	47.5	51 -7%	57 -20%	63 -33%	62 -31%	47 1%
Idle Upper Side *	33.4	29 13%	38 -14%	37 -11%	25 25%	37.4 -12%
Idle Bottom *	35	33 6%	42 -20%	38 -9%	26 26%	38.4 -10%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Test na stres

Test stresu (Prime95 i Furmark w trybie ciągłym) przedstawia ekstremalny scenariusz analizy stabilności systemu pod pełnym obciążeniem. W trakcie testu prędkość taktowania CPU spadła z punktu startowego wynoszącego odpowiednio 2,5 GHz (rdzenie P) i 2,1 GHz (rdzenie E) do około 1,7 GHz (rdzenie P) i 1,5 GHz (rdzenie E). Częstotliwość taktowania GPU waha się w granicach od 700 do 1300 MHz.

Mówcy

Głośniki stereo dają przyzwoity dźwięk, ale taki, któremu brakuje basów.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Zarządzanie energią - Blade jest bardzo głodny w stanie bezczynności

Pobór mocy

W trybie jałowym zapotrzebowanie na energię (do 39 watów) jest stosunkowo wysokie. Wydaje się, że jest to ogólny problem występujący w modelach Blade 2022, z którym z którym zetknęliśmy się przy wielu okazjach. Pod obciążeniem zużycie jest normalne dla tego rodzaju sprzętu. O ile test Witcher 3 przebiegał przy stałym poborze mocy, o tyle podczas testu obciążeniowego wymagania gwałtownie spadły - procesor został stłumiony. Zasilacz (230 W) jest odpowiednio duży.

Pobór mocy

wyłączony / stan wstrzymania	0.65 / 5.7 W
luz	31.6 / 33.3 / 38.6 W
obciążenie	149 / 160 W


Legenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		26%	-18%	24%	29%	-8%	18%	21%
Idle Minimum *	31.6	10.8 66%	31 2%	12 62%	4 87%	33.2 -5%	14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27) 55%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years) 57%
Idle Average *	33.3	17 49%	35 -5%	17 49%	10 70%	36.4 -9%	19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27) 40%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years) 43%
Idle Maximum *	38.6	17.8 54%	46 -19%	24 38%	19 51%	37.6 3%	26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27) 32%	26.6 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years) 31%
Load Average *	149	116 22%	120 19%	106 29%	114 23%	116.7 22%	125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27) 16%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) 28%
Witcher 3 ultra *	149.6	144 4%	202 -35%	159.9 -7%	183.2 -22%	172 -15%
Load Maximum *	160	220 -38%	268 -68%	208 -30%	221 -38%	228.6 -43%	248 ?(160 - 319, n=27) -55%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=155, last 2 years) -56%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø149.6 (124.3-155)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø149.2 (145.9-160.7)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø34.3 (32.4-37.2)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø65.5 (61.8-78.2)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (43-78.2)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (132.4-160.1)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø143.3 (134.9-149.9)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.4 (23.4-28.2)

Żywotność baterii

W teście WiFi (otwieranie stron internetowych przy użyciu skryptu) i teście wideo (krótki film Big Buck Bunny (kodowanie H.264, FHD) w pętli) 15-calowe urządzenie osiągnęło na akumulatorze odpowiednio 4,34 h i 5,52 h. Podczas obu testów funkcje oszczędzania energii w laptopie były wyłączone, a jasność wyświetlacza była ustawiona na 150 cd/m². Test wideo został przeprowadzony także przy wyłączonym module radiowym.

W sumie Blade nie był w stanie zapewnić imponujących czasów pracy na akumulatorze - nawet jak na potężny laptop z matrycą QHD. W przekroju całego testu konkurencja oferuje lepszą wytrzymałość - zarówno w wartościach bezwzględnych, jak i w przeliczeniu na watogodziny.

Wydajność akumulatora

luz		6h 44min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)		4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 52min
obciążenie		2h 05min

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 93.48 Wh	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Czasy pracy		18%	24%	52%	21%	7%	15%
Reader / Idle	404		601 49%	931 130%	603 49%		566 ?(155 - 1290, n=68, last 2 years) 40%
H.264	352	436 24%	371 5%	448 27%			408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) 16%
WiFi v1.3	274	445 62%	410 50%	446 63%	336 23%	292 7%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=155, last 2 years) 37%
Load	125	86 -31%	112 -10%	109 -13%	114 -9%		85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=119, last 2 years) -32%

Za

+ Jasny, wysokokontrastowy wyświetlacz OLED (QHD)

+ Dobre odwzorowanie kolorów i pokrycie przestrzeni barwnej

+ Smukła ramka wyświetlacza

+ Wytrzymała metalowa obudowa

+ Wysoka wydajność systemu

+ Stosunkowo umiarkowane wydzielanie ciepła

+ Dysk SSD PCIe-4

+ Miejsce na drugi dysk SSD PCIe-4

+ Thunderbolt 4

+ Power Delivery

Przeciw

- Odblaskowy wyświetlacz

- Słaba żywotność baterii

- Wysokie zapotrzebowanie na energię w stanie bezczynności

- Brak zaawansowanego Optimusa

Werdykt - Kompaktowy mocarz

Razer Blade 15 (wcześnie 22), udostępniony przez firmę Razer.

Główne obszary zastosowań Blade 15 powinny obejmować edycję wideo, renderowanie i gry. Na stronie .Core-i9 12900HcPU i GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU (TGP: 110 W) dostarczają niezbędnej mocy. Szybki dysk SSD PCIe-4 (1 TB) zapewnia krótkie czasy ładowania.

Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) to potężne narzędzie zarówno dla graczy, jak i typów kreatywnych.

Skupia się nie tylko na wysokiej wydajności: Wyniki maksymalne rdzeni obliczeniowych są przeciętne w porównaniu z recenzowanymi wcześniej laptopami z 12900H lub 3070 Ti. Produkcja ciepła jest wprawdzie typowa dla laptopa o tej mocy, ale emisja hałasu jest stosunkowo umiarkowana. Tego ostatniego nie można powiedzieć o poborze mocy w trybie bezczynności: Blade 15 pomaga sobie bardzo dużym łykiem z butelki.

Realne czasy pracy na akumulatorze na poziomie 4 do 6 godzin nie zachwycają. Pod tym względem konkurencja ma znacznie więcej do zaoferowania. Niemniej jednak akumulator można ładować przez uniwersalny zasilacz USB-C (min. 65 W, 20 V), a oba porty USB-C (2x Thunderbolt) obsługują Power Delivery (oraz Displayport).

Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, refleksyjny panel OLED (QHD) wypada nieco lepiej od konwencjonalnego panelu LED (QHD) znajdującego się w recenzowanym wcześniej modelu Blade 2022. Oba wyświetlacze oferują dobre pokrycie przestrzeni barw (sRGB: 100 %) i dobre odwzorowanie kolorów. Model OLED ma nosa do przodu, jeśli chodzi o poziomy czerni, jasność i czasy reakcji, przy czym model LED zdobywa punkty dzięki matowej powierzchni.

Ewentualną alternatywą dla tego urządzenia może być m.in.Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z. Pod względem wydajności procesor jest na równi, ale dodatkowe punkty zdobywa dzięki jaśniejszemu wyświetlaczowi w formacie 16:10, a także znacznie dłuższemu czasowi pracy na baterii. Budżetową alternatywą może byćAorus 15 XE5. Pomimo tego, że ta maszyna jest o kilkaset dolarów tańsza w cenie, zapewnia nieco więcej mocy i lepszy czas pracy na baterii niż Blade.

Cena i dostępność

Recenzencką specyfikację Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 22) można mieć na Amazon za 1 967 dolarów.

▶ load Youtube video

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) - 04/03/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Wykonanie

88 / 98 → 89%

Klawiatura

83%

Myszka

89%

Komunikacja

73 / 80 → 91%

Waga

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Akumulator

63 / 95 → 66%

Wyświetlacz

91%

Wydajność w grach

99%

Wydajność w programach użytkowych

93%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Hałas

85 / 90 → 95%

Głośniki

82%

Kamerka

47 / 85 → 55%

Średnio

80%

90%

Gaming - Ważona średnia

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.