Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarRecenzja laptopa Schenker XMG Evo 14 (M24) - dobry, wszechstronny laptop z procesorem Ryzen 8000 i do 96 GB pamięci RAM
Nowy XMG Evo 14 firmy Schenker to kompaktowy 14-calowy laptop, który ma wyróżniać się z tłumu dużą różnorodnością połączeń, a także dobrymi opcjami konserwacji. Użytkownik ma do wyboru procesor AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (od ok. 1060 USD) lub Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (od ok. 1223 USD) wraz z odpowiadającymi im układami iGPU. Nasze urządzenie testowe to wariant AMD z 32 GB pamięci RAM, dyskiem SSD o pojemności 1 TB i preinstalowanym systemem Windows, który można kupić za około 1335 USD. Ponadto, firma Schenker opublikowała niezwykle szczegółową analizę https://www.xmg.gg/en/news-deep-dive-xmg-evo-m24/ zawierający wszystkie informacje dotyczące Evo 14 i Evo 15.
Alternatywnie, Tuxedo oferuje InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen9, które są identycznie zbudowanymi urządzeniami z systemem Linux. Model AMD można nabyć za około 1345 USD, podczas gdy wariant Intel kosztuje około 1470 USD.
Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.9 % | v8 | 09/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 84.9 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 83.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
| 85.3 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.1 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Prosimy pamiętać: Niedawno zaktualizowaliśmy nasz system oceny i wyniki wersji 8 nie są porównywalne z wynikami wersji 7. Więcej informacji znajdą Państwo tutaj.
Obudowa i łączność
Tak samo jak w przypadku większego XMG Evo 15producent zdecydował się na zastosowanie wytrzymałej aluminiowej obudowy - z tą różnicą, że Evo 14 nie jest czarna, a raczej ciemnoszara. Dzięki temu jest ona znacznie mniej wrażliwa na zbieranie odcisków palców. Jego ogólna stabilność jest bardzo dobra, a zawiasy są również ładne i ciasne, dzięki czemu podczas regulacji kąta pokrywy występuje tylko minimalne kołysanie. Maksymalny kąt otwarcia wynosi prawie 180 stopni.
W porównaniu do większości innych obecnych 14-calowych laptopów, Evo 14 oferuje dużą liczbę połączeń, w tym Gigabit Ethernet i pełny czytnik kart. Jest jednak dla nas tajemnicą, dlaczego jeden z trzech zwykłych portów USB-A obsługuje tylko stary standard 2.0. Jego opcje konserwacji są również świetne, ponieważ są dwa gniazda na pamięć RAM (maksymalnie 96 GB) i dwa gniazda na dyski SSD M.2 2280. Niemniej jednak obudowa pozostaje dość kompaktowa i waży 1,46 kg, więc nie jest też zbyt ciężka.
Moduł WLAN (Intel AX210) zapewnia bardzo dobre i stabilne prędkości transferu, ale nie obsługuje jeszcze Wi-Fi 7. Kamera internetowa - obsługująca efekty Studio Microsoftu - robi przyzwoite zdjęcia, a dzięki czujnikowi podczerwieni na pokładzie jest również rozpoznawanie twarzy za pomocą Windows Hello. Pełnoprawny czytnik kart pamięci najwyraźniej nie polubił naszej karty referencyjnej (maks. 90 MB/s); udało mu się uzyskać ponad 250 MB/s przy użyciu innej karty (ADATA V90). Oznacza to, że można spodziewać się dość znaczących różnic w zależności od używanej karty.
Podświetlana na czarno klawiatura dobrze kontrastuje z szarą obudową i jest przeciętna do pisania, ale jej większe klawisze wydają dość głośny dźwięk. Szklany clickpad (12,3 x 7,7 cm) generalnie działa dobrze, ale zalecamy tylko stukanie w niego w celu wprowadzania danych. Mechaniczne kliknięcia wydają głośny dźwięk, który nie jest szczególnie wysokiej jakości.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Wyświetlacz - IPS o jasności 400 nitów i 100% sRGB
14-calowy wyświetlacz IPS w Evo 14 wyświetla bardzo ostry obraz dzięki rozdzielczości 2880 x 1800 pikseli w proporcjach 16:10. Jego matowa powierzchnia pomaga zapobiegać odbiciom, ale obraz na szczęście nie wygląda na ziarnisty. Kolory są żywe, ale nie porównywalne z panelami OLED. Z kolei nie jest używany PWM, a częstotliwość odświeżania 120 Hz zapewnia płynne ruchy. Jasność wynosi ponad 400 cd/m², co w połączeniu z przyzwoitym poziomem czerni daje maksymalny współczynnik kontrastu przekraczający 1300:1. Jednak ani jasność, ani temperatura kolorów nie mogą być regulowane automatycznie.
Wstępnie skalibrowany profil można pobrać z Centrum sterowania, co zrobiło bardzo dobre wrażenie podczas naszego testu. W naszej analizie przy użyciu profesjonalnego oprogramowania CalMAN, jego odchylenia kolorów i skali szarości były już poniżej ważnego limitu 3. Moglibyśmy jeszcze bardziej poprawić wyświetlacz za pomocą naszej własnej kalibracji (dostępnej do pobrania za darmo w ramce po prawej stronie), ale nie jest to absolutnie konieczne. Wraz z pełnym pokryciem sRGB, panel nadaje się do edycji obrazów bez żadnych ograniczeń.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
rozświetlenie: 90 %
na akumulatorze: 421 cd/m²
kontrast: 1316:1 (czerń: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE NV140WUM-N49, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 25% | -1% | -1% | 1% | -46% | 26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71 | 99.9 41% | 70.3 -1% | 70.1 -1% | 72.42 2% | 37.7 -47% | 99.9 41% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 97.7 -2% | 99.79 0% | 56.1 -44% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.8 | 97.2 34% | 72.1 -1% | 72.3 -1% | 73.94 2% | 39 -46% | 98.9 36% |
| Response Times | 93% | -19% | -23% | 5% | -15% | 97% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.3 ? | 1.3 ? 95% | 32.7 ? -24% | 31.1 ? -18% | 7 ? 73% | 23.5 ? 11% | 0.61 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.4 ? | 1.2 ? 91% | 15.2 ? -13% | 17.1 ? -28% | 22 ? -64% | 18.8 ? -40% | 0.67 ? 95% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238 ? | 240 ? | ||||
| Screen | 92% | -7% | -44% | 197% | -250% | -52% | |
| Brightness middle | 421 | 385 -9% | 418 -1% | 466 11% | 373 -11% | 419 0% | 411 -2% |
| Brightness | 412 | 382 -7% | 408 -1% | 467 13% | 377 -8% | 399 -3% | 414 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 99 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.03 91% | 0.3 6% | 0.29 9% | 0.015 95% | 0.31 3% | |
| Contrast | 1316 | 12833 875% | 1393 6% | 1607 22% | 24867 1790% | 1352 3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.99 -53% | 1.6 -23% | 2.5 -92% | 1.47 -13% | 7.5 -477% | 2.8 -115% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 3.69 -54% | 2.5 -4% | 6.1 -154% | 2.49 -4% | 28.3 -1079% | 5.5 -129% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 -63% | 1.1 -0% | 1.3 -18% | 1.78 -62% | 6.2 -464% | 2.2 -100% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 0.8 43% | 2 -43% | 4.1 -193% | 1.7 -21% | 4.6 -229% | 1.8 -29% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6446 101% | 6474 100% | 6851 95% | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6057 107% | 6319 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 70% /
78% | -9% /
-7% | -23% /
-32% | 68% /
127% | -104% /
-172% | 24% /
-8% |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17246 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Wydajność - Ryzen 7 8845HS i do 96 GB pamięci RAM
XMG Evo 14 posiada trzy profile wydajności do wyboru(Balanced, Enthusiast, Overboost) i podsumowaliśmy dane w poniższej tabeli. Domyślny tryb Enthusiast został użyty do naszych testów porównawczych i pomiarów.
| Profil energetyczny | TDP procesora | TDP baterii | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy Grafika | maks. emisja hałasu wentylatora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zrównoważony | 25 watów | 25 watów | 12,318 punktów | 2,661 punktów | 29 dB(A) |
| Enthusiast | 45 watów | 35 watów | 15,494 punktów | 2,860 punktów | 37.6 dB(A) |
| Overboost | 60 watów | 50 watów | 16 315 punktów | 2 914 punktów | 44,6 dB(A) |
XMG Evo 14 to superszybki laptop z procesorem AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Zen 4) zapewnił ogólnie bardzo dobrą i stabilną wydajność, choć nie był w stanie dotrzymać kroku nowemu Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Zen 5). Mimo to, procesory Zen 5 są obecnie dostępne tylko z przylutowaną pamięcią RAM. Podczas naszych testów, Evo 14 był zawsze responsywnym urządzeniem i nie odnotowaliśmy żadnych problemów ze stabilnością systemu, a ponadto jego opóźnienia były bardzo niskie. Nasze urządzenie testowe korzystało z wersji Samsung 990 Pro o pojemności 1 TB, która zarządzała bardzo wysokimi prędkościami transferu. Pozostawały one również stabilne przy długotrwałym obciążeniu, co nie jest rzeczą oczywistą.
Zintegrowany Radeon 780M iGPU osiągnął przyzwoite wartości wydajności i okazał się szczególnie imponujący w grach, plasując się tuż za Intel Arc Graphics z 8 rdzeniami Xektóry wciąż wyraźnie prowadził w testach syntetycznych. Jednakże, nowy Radeon 890M był zauważalnie szybszy w naszych standardowych testach porównawczych w grach. Jego wydajność graficzna pozostała stabilna przy długotrwałym obciążeniu.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (15494 - 18037, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=8) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2245, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (6110 - 7026, n=8) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (677 - 698, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2442 - 2908, n=8) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64759 - 74664, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 21264, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=12) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3157, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11625 - 12726, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=9) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=8) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.5 - 77, n=8) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (24472 - 29544, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (100050 - 125873, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4503 - 5180, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14496 - 15519, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67393 - 172642, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=8) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12935 - 15911, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (38580 - 41668, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=5) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=5) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9367 - 10009, n=5) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1702 - 1939, n=5) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1634 - 1872, n=5) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1860 - 2040, n=5) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2564, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1476 - 1849, n=5) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 476, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=5) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=5) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
| PCMark 10 Score | 7284 pkt. | |
Pomoc | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 94300, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 70235, n=8) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82796 - 93239, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 100507, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 107.1, n=8) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13295 pkt. | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7728 pkt. | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3215 pkt. | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 500 pkt. | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2816 pkt. | |
Pomoc | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 664, n=47) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (203 - 713, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 164.4 | 152.9 | 65 | 27.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 147 | 47 | 36 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.1 | 127.5 | 85.9 | 78.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78 | 38.3 | 27.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.6 | 46.7 | 39.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 49 | 45 | 43 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 161.3 | 66.7 | 56 | 48.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 32.6 | 26.3 | 23 |
Emisje i moc
Evo 14 wykorzystuje dwa wentylatory i jest bardzo cichym urządzeniem podczas codziennego użytkowania. Nawet podczas grania lub w teście obciążeniowym zmierzyliśmy maksymalnie 37,6 dB(A) w trybie Enthusiast. Podczas korzystania z trybu Balanced urządzenie staje się jednak jeszcze cichsze (maks. 29 dB(A)), jeśli jest to dla Państwa priorytetem. W trybie Overboost zanotowaliśmy głośne 44,6 dB(A), co raczej nie jest warte zachodu, ponieważ nie dostajemy dużo więcej mocy. Z naszego urządzenia testowego nie dochodziły żadne inne odgłosy elektroniczne.
Temperatury powierzchni były całkowicie nieszkodliwe, z wyjątkiem gorącego punktu na spodzie. W szczególności obszar klawiatury zawsze pozostawał w przyjemnej temperaturze. Mimo to, należy unikać kontaktu skóry ze spodem podczas intensywnego użytkowania.
Pomimo wysokiej rozdzielczości panelu 120 Hz, zużycie energii w stanie spoczynku laptopa jest bardzo niskie i nie odnotowaliśmy żadnych problemów również pod obciążeniem. Zmierzyliśmy maksymalnie 83 W, przy czym wartość ta szybko ustabilizowała się na poziomie ~76 W podczas testu obciążeniowego. 100-watowy zasilacz jest w zupełności wystarczający. Akumulator urządzenia o pojemności 80 Wh zapewnia dobry czas pracy na baterii, ale został on nawet przekroczony przez niektórych konkurentów. W teście WLAN zmierzyliśmy nieco poniżej 12 godzin (150 cd/m²) i 9:40 godzin (maksymalna jasność). Przy 120 Hz było to około 60 minut mniej w każdym przypadku. W teście wideo wytrzymał bardzo dobre 15,5 godziny.
Hałas
| luz |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 26.3 dB |
| obciążenie |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB cichy 40 dB(A) słyszalny 50 dB(A) irytujący |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE Radeon 660M, R5 7535U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -2% | -5% | -3% | -2% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 27 -3% | 27.1 -3% | 25.7 2% | 27.2 -3% | 24.5 7% | 23.9 9% |
| Load Average * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 34.9 7% | 36.2 4% | 31.3 17% | 38 -1% | 44.3 -18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 39 -4% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 41.4 -10% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 46.61 -24% | 41.5 -10% | 44.3 -18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -11% | -2% | -1% | -6% | 0% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 49 -18% | 43.7 -5% | 44.6 -7% | 45.2 -8% | 43.1 -3% | 39.6 5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50.1 | 59 -18% | 49.4 1% | 50.9 -2% | 49.2 2% | 45.7 9% | 38.6 23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 28 -3% | 27.7 -2% | 26.5 2% | 29.6 -9% | 27.9 -3% | 24.8 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.7 | 29 -5% | 28.6 -3% | 26.3 5% | 30.2 -9% | 28.3 -2% | 25.3 9% |
* ... im mniej tym lepiej
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| wyłączony / stan wstrzymania | 0.46 / 1.39 W |
| luz | 4.6 / 7.8 / 8 W |
| obciążenie |
71.7 / 83 W |
   
| |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czasy pracy | 53% | 20% | -30% | 51% | -8% | 7% | -11% | |
| H.264 | 929 | 1251 35% | 612 -34% | 1031 11% | 791 ? -15% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 990 38% | 888 24% | 571 -20% | 758 6% | 748 5% | 710 -1% | 608 ? -15% |
| Load | 99 | 165 67% | 101 2% | 64 -35% | 194 96% | 79 -20% | 110 11% | 97 ? -2% |
| Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1051 ? | ||||||
| Gaming | 85 | 92 ? |
Za
Przeciw
Werdykt - XMG Evo 14 to dobry, kompletny zestaw bez typowych kompromisów
XMG Evo 14 firmy Schenker udowadnia, że nawet nowoczesne laptopy nie muszą obyć się bez mnóstwa złączy i rozbudowanych opcji konserwacji. Korzystając z obu gniazd pamięci RAM, można uzyskać do 96 GB, pojemność dysku SSD można bardzo łatwo rozszerzyć, a na pokładzie znajduje się cała masa złączy. Co więcej, urządzenie można konfigurować w szerokim zakresie.
Procesor AMD oferuje dobrą i przede wszystkim stabilną wydajność - to samo można powiedzieć o karcie graficznej Radeon 780M. Wyświetlacz IPS urządzenia oferuje wysoką rozdzielczość, częstotliwość odświeżania 120 Hz, a także wierne kolory, co oznacza, że można bez wysiłku edytować obrazy w przestrzeni kolorów sRGB.
Nowy Schenker XMG Evo 14 oferuje dobry pakiet, w tym metalową obudowę, za wstępną cenę nieco ponad 1000 USD. Pomimo stosunkowo kompaktowej obudowy, nie trzeba rezygnować z solidnej wydajności, licznych połączeń i dobrych opcji konserwacji.
Jego czasy pracy są ogólnie dobre, nawet jeśli kilku konkurentów oferuje jeszcze lepszą wytrzymałość. Warto przyjrzeć się nowemu XMG Evo 14 w szczególności ze względu na jego cenę początkową wynoszącą około 1000 USD. Chociaż model Intela obsługuje Thunderbolt 4, jego ograniczony wzrost wydajności nie jest naszym zdaniem wart dopłaty.
Cena i dostępność
XMG Evo 14 AMD nie jest dostępny w Stanach Zjednoczonych, ale można go kupić w międzynarodowych sklepach, takich jak bestware.com, a jego ceny zaczynają się od około 1000 USD.
Prosimy pamiętać: Niedawno zaktualizowaliśmy nasz system oceny i wyniki wersji 8 nie są porównywalne z wynikami wersji 7. Więcej informacji znajdą Państwo tutaj.
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
-
22/09/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Price comparison
