Recenzja Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Niedrogi laptop do gier z RTX 4050 i długim czasem pracy

Name: Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE
Brand: Acer

Trwałość.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, GeForce RTX 4050, USB 4 i jasny wyświetlacz 16:10 (16 cali, WUXGA, 165 Hz, G-Sync) to najważniejsze cechy stosunkowo niedrogiego (1250 euro) Nitro 16. W odpowiednich warunkach i tak już bardzo dobry czas pracy na baterii poprzednika został jeszcze bardziej przekroczony. Niniejsza recenzja ocenia wydajność i inne cechy tej alternatywnej konfiguracji.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 13/08/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows

Przy cenie nieco poniżej 1250 euro, obecna konfiguracja Acer Nitro 16 należy do laptopów gamingowych z niższego segmentu cenowego. Nasza jednostka Nitro 16 jest zasilana przez AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS APU i procesor Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU.

Konkurencja obejmuje urządzenia takie jak Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS, Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23), Gigabyte G7 KE, Asus TUF A15 FA507oraz Medion Erazer Scout E20.

Informacje o obudowie, wyposażeniu i urządzeniach wejściowych można znaleźć w naszej recenzji identycznie zbudowanego siostrzanego modeluktóry jest wyposażony w Ryzen 7 7735HS i kartę graficzną RTX 4070 GPU.

Test device courtesy of Nvidia DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE (Nitro 16 Rodzina)

Procesor

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS 6 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt R

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2355 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3623, Optimus

Pamięć

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Matryca

16.00 cali 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pikseli 142 PPI, AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, refleksująca: nie, 165 Hz

Chipset

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Dysk twardy

SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, 512 GB

, 426 GB wolne miejsce

Karta dźwiękowa

Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.4

Złącza

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, czytnik kart: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 27.9 x 360.1 x 279.9

Akumulator

90 Wh, 5850 mAh litowo-jonowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.56 kg, zasilacz: 620 g

Cena

1399 Euro

Odnośniki

Acer strona producenta
Acer sekcja

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.7 % v7 ^(old)	08/2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
85.1 % v7 ^(old)	07/2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.9 mm	15.60"	2569x1440
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	01/2023	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	29 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Porównanie rozmiarów

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Gigabyte G7 KE Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Asus TUF A15 FA507 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

Lewa strona: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 2.0 (USB-A), czytnik kart pamięci (MicroSD), audio combo

Prawa strona: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), gniazdo na blokadę kabla

Tył: Port zasilania, HDMI 2.1, USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	84 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.3 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.98 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	89 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	87.5 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1636 (1591^min - 1674^max) MBit/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1491 (1391^min - 1562^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1476 (1278^min - 1551^max) MBit/s -1%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=54)	1288 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	985 (902^min - 1065^max) MBit/s -34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	941 (465^min - 984^max) MBit/s -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1744 (1670^min - 1770^max) MBit/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1685 (1180^min - 1751^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1627^min - 1681^max) MBit/s -2%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=54)	1407 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	957 (480^min - 968^max) MBit/s -43%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	917 (797^min - 933^max) MBit/s -46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s -46%

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1491 (1391-1562)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (465-984)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1636 (1591-1674)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1278-1551)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1684 (1180-1751)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (480-968)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1627-1681)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1744 (1670-1770)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)

ColorChecker Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE: 14.18 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 20.56 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Do zalet matowego, 16-calowego ekranu IPS o rozdzielczości 1920 x 1200 pikseli i formacie 16:10 należy obsługa technologii G-Sync, brak migotania PWM oraz krótki czas reakcji. Jasność i kontrast panelu 165 Hz spełniają odpowiednie cele (odpowiednio > 300 cd/m² i 1000:1).

Nie ma zbyt wielu różnic w porównaniu z panelem WQXGA (2560 x 1600 pikseli) siostrzanego modelu siostrzanego modeluchoć ten ostatni oferuje wyższą maksymalną jasność (prawie 500 cd/m²).


387 cd/m²	381 cd/m²	378 cd/m²
381 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	388 cd/m²
358 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	350 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 415 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 379.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 84 %
na akumulatorze: 415 cd/m²
kontrast: 1153:1 (czerń: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.68
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.182

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) BOE0AD1, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.6"	Gigabyte G7 KE AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer Scout E20 LG Philips LGD0611, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-8%	12%	-6%	-12%	-12%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	80	69.3 -13%	98.6 23%	70.4 -12%	64.9 -19%	65.1 -19%	67.9 -15%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	97.3 -2%	99.9 1%	99.8 0%	96.5 -3%	96.7 -3%	99.1 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	77.4	70.7 -9%	86.3 11%	71.7 -7%	66.6 -14%	66.5 -14%	69.9 -10%
Response Times		-66%	-81%	-3%	-236%	-66%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	11.2 ?(5.3, 5.9)	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) -39%	15.6 ?(7.4, 8.2) -39%	5 ?(2.1, 2.9) 55%	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6) -171%	14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6) -32%	11 ?(5, 6) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	5.2 ?(1.9, 3.3)	10 ?(5.7, 4.3) -92%	11.6 ?(5.8, 5.8) -123%	8.3 ?(4.2, 4.1) -60%	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1) -300%	10.4 ?(5.4, 5) -100%	5 ?(2, 3) 4%
PWM Frequency
Screen		25%	-2%	28%	28%	14%	27%
Brightness middle	415	301 -27%	302 -27%	307 -26%	288 -31%	312 -25%	520 25%
Brightness	380	294 -23%	278 -27%	301 -21%	271 -29%	303 -20%	494 30%
Brightness Distribution	84	94 12%	85 1%	93 11%	91 8%	91 8%	91 8%
Black Level *	0.36	0.21 42%	0.36 -0%	0.2 44%	0.17 53%	0.25 31%	0.39 -8%
Contrast	1153	1433 24%	839 -27%	1535 33%	1694 47%	1248 8%	1333 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.71	1.79 62%	2.24 52%	1.32 72%	1.9 60%	2.65 44%	1.94 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.98	3.48 50%	5.52 21%	4.6 34%	3.3 53%	6.44 8%	5.62 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.68	1.2 55%		1.03 62%	0.9 66%	0.96 64%	0.74 72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	2.5 31%	3.87 -8%	2.1 42%	2.7 25%	3.2 11%	2.94 18%
Gamma	2.182 ^101%	2.265 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.247 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.246 ^98%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	7153 ^91%	6157 ^106%	6936 ^94%	6815 ^95%	6535 ^99%	7258 ^90%	6443 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / 5%	-24% / -11%	6% / 16%	-73% / -18%	-21% / -3%	7% / 16%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Ekran wykazuje przyzwoite odwzorowanie kolorów fabrycznie - z odchyleniem około 4,7, cel (DeltaE < 3) nie jest dokładnie dopasowany. Kalibracja zmniejsza odchylenie do 2,68 i zapewnia bardziej zrównoważone poziomy szarości. Panel może całkowicie odtworzyć gamę kolorów sRGB, ale nie przestrzenie kolorów Adobe RGB i Display P3.

Ma to miejsce w przypadku panelu WQXGA w konfiguracji oinnym wariancie Nitro 16, a także ekranów większości konkurentów. Tylko wyświetlacz XMG Focus 15 oferuje dobre pokrycie DCI-P3.

CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.9 ms rise
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.3 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Panel IPS oferuje stabilne kąty widzenia, które można odczytać z dowolnej pozycji. Jasność panelu jest wystarczająca do czytelności na zewnątrz, jeśli słońce nie świeci zbyt mocno.

Wydajność: Acer skupia się na Rembrandcie i Adzie Lovelace

Seria Nitro 16 łączy układy GPU Ada-Lovelace z procesorami Intel lub AMD. Obecny model opiera się na AMD i jest dostępny za około 1250 euro (~ 1500 USD). Jest to więc obecnie najtańszy przedstawiciel tej serii.

Warunki testowe

Spośród sześciu trybów wydajności specyficznych dla producenta (patrz tabela poniżej) wykorzystano tryby "Balanced" (do testów porównawczych) i "Eco" (do testów baterii). tryby "Turbo" i "Performance" są dostępne tylko przy zasilaniu sieciowym (poziom naładowania baterii > 30%). Przycisk nad klawiaturą umożliwia przełączanie między trybami. Alternatywnie można to zrobić za pomocą oprogramowania NitroSense (centrum sterowania laptopa). Dioda LED wskazuje aktywny tryb.

Uwaga: Podczas gdy model other Nitro 16 był testowany z aktywnym trybem Optimus, tryb dGPU (= iGPU jest wyłączone) jest używany na bieżącym urządzeniu testowym. Testy baterii są jednak wyjątkiem. Dlatego wyniki benchmarków nie zawsze są bezpośrednio porównywalne.

	Turbo	Power	Balanced	Quiet	Balanced (bateria)	Eco (bateria)
PowerLimit 1 (HWInfo)	95 Watt	75 Watt	65 Watt	45 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Limit mocy 2(HWInfo)	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Wydajność (Witcher 3 )	~84 fps	~83 fps	~82 fps	~74 fps	-	-
Hałas (Witcher 3 )	61 dB(A)	56 dB(A)	45 dB(A)	35 dB(A)	-	-

Procesor

Ryzen Ryzen 5 7535HSaPU (Zen 3+, Rembrandt-R) oferuje sześć rdzeni CPU z łącznie 12 wątkami przy maksymalnym taktowaniu pojedynczego rdzenia wynoszącym 4,55 GHz. Procesor potwierdza stałe obciążenie wielowątkowe (CB15 Loop) ze stale wysokim taktowaniem Turbo - niezależnie od wybranego trybu pracy systemu. Różnice pomiędzy poszczególnymi trybami są niewielkie.

Nic dziwnego, że APU Ryzen 7 z siostrzanego modelu oferuje większą wydajność wielowątkową - w końcu ma 8 rdzeni CPU. Pod względem wydajności jednowątkowej, która jest bardziej istotna w codziennym użytkowaniu, APU są niemal na równi.

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS: Ø1686 (1633.32-1757.16)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3594 (3477.05-4085.8)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2150 (2119.99-2197.32)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2149 (1980.2-2683.11)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	77.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71.8 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	67 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	60.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	58.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	58.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	51.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	46.7 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	24270 Points +123%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +99%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points +55%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	15718 Points +44%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	14232 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	10900 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8613 - 10900, n=2)	9757 Points -10%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1935 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1849 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points +20%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1701 Points +14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1445 - 1488, n=2)	1467 Points -1%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	9152 Points +117%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +95%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6051 Points +43%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points +30%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5368 Points +27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points +27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	4224 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (3333 - 4224, n=2)	3779 Points -11%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	742 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	717 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	654 Points +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	581 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (560 - 581, n=2)	571 Points -2%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	4086 (3477.05^min - 4085.8^max) Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +93%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	2683 Points +53%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points +52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2197 Points +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1757 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1457 - 1757, n=2)	1607 Points -9%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	270 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	269 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	250 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	241 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (232 - 241, n=2)	237 Points -2%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (286 - 467, n=2)	377 Seconds * -32%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	286 Seconds *
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	225 Seconds * +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	213 Seconds * +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds * +34%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +40%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	135 Seconds * +53%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	99191 MIPS +104%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +74%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS +44%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	63399 MIPS +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS +26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS +25%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	53712 MIPS +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	48646 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (40996 - 48646, n=2)	44821 MIPS -8%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6367 MIPS +12%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6004 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	5670 MIPS
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS -2%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5563 MIPS -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (5206 - 5670, n=2)	5438 MIPS -4%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	18308 Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +90%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	12423 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points +54%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10284 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	7852 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (7189 - 7852, n=2)	7521 Points -4%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1813 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1683 Points +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1502 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1481 - 1502, n=2)	1492 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1345 Points -10%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	25 fps +76%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	16.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	14.2 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (11.3 - 14.2, n=2)	12.8 fps -10%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (46.2 - 57, n=2)	51.6 s * -12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	46.2 s *
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	45.5 s * +2%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	44.9 s * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	39.5 s * +15%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0.503 - 0.557, n=2)	0.53 sec * -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	0.503 sec *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec * +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * +1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4748 sec * +6%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4451 sec * +12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4345 sec * +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec * +15%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

14167

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37321

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6257

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.79 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

20.14 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

102.32 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1757 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

241 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

151.1 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4224 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

581 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1488 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

10900 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	88.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	85.1 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	61.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59.5 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	52 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	28033 KRay/s +117%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +67%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	20615 KRay/s +59%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s +26%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	14305 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	13017 KRay/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12945 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (9617 - 12945, n=2)	11281 KRay/s -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	122098 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	108878 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points +34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points +29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79252 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71043 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (62262 - 79252, n=2)	70757 Points -11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	65572 Points -17%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	5324 MB/s +99%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +81%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	4566 MB/s +70%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3236 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3233 MB/s +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2679 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (2092 - 2679, n=2)	2386 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	134897 Points +63%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	124433 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points +41%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	106626 Points +29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82540 Points
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80285 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (73607 - 82540, n=2)	78074 Points -5%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15380 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13789 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points +34%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points +29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9786 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9408 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8888 - 9786, n=2)	9337 Points -5%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7390 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	63432 Points +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points +34%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	51986 Points +20%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	43495 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (34054 - 43495, n=2)	38775 Points -11%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	35141 Points -19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	32002 Points -26%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	110707 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	105083 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102731 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	86309 MB/s -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (35651 - 105083, n=2)	70367 MB/s -33%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67010 MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s -37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1587 MB/s +139%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +103%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	1089 MB/s +64%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	961 MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	921 MB/s +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	665 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (551 - 665, n=2)	608 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15209 KRay/s +120%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	11242 KRay/s +63%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s +24%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7630 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6932 KRay/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	6899 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (5170 - 6899, n=2)	6035 KRay/s -13%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50110 MPixel/s +74%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s +38%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37944 MPixel/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	29922 MPixel/s +4%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29206 MPixel/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28865 MPixel/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (27096 - 28865, n=2)	27981 MPixel/s -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -5%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działający system zapewnia wystarczającą moc obliczeniową dla wymagających aplikacji, takich jak rendering, edycja wideo i gry. Prędkości transferów pamięci roboczej (DDR5-4800) pozostają poniżej potencjału, gdyż porównanie z wartościami z modelu Asus TUF Gaming A16 pokazuje.

Pamięć robocza działa w trybie dwukanałowym.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7556 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6926 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	6690 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	6690 Points 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6126 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	11207 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points +9%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10301 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	9736 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9736 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9726 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9836 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9674 Points +18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9038 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	8167 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	8167 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	10622 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	10219 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10219 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9585 Points -6%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6703 Points -34%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2114 Points +42%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1937 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points +28%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1824 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points +19%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1489 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1489 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1949 Points +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1857 Points +24%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1804 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points +15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1494 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1494 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2384 Points +55%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2023 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1800 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1538 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1538 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1966 Points +46%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1929 Points +44%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1878 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1342 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1342 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5548 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5810 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score		6690 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77899 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59079 MB/s +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (48529 - 49119, n=2)	48824 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48529 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44994 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84974 MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s +37%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67235 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50259 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47559 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (40191 - 50259, n=2)	45225 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76412 MB/s +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59900 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54982 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (51316 - 54982, n=2)	53149 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46966 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	98.7 ns * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (87.7 - 103.4, n=2)	95.6 ns * -9%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns * -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	89.8 ns * -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87.7 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 ns * +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns * +6%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Standardowy test monitora opóźnień (surfowanie po Internecie, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, duże FFT w Prime95) nie wykazał żadnych nieprawidłowości. System wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do poprawy lub nawet pogorszenia wydajności.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2504.7 μs * -239%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2463.6 μs * -234%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1969.3 μs * -167%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * -78%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs * -53%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	738.5 μs *

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Pamięć masowa

Acer wyposaża Nitro 16 w dysk SSD o pojemności 512 GB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) firmy SK Hynix. Zapewnia on dobrą szybkość transmisji danych, ale nie należy do najbardziej wydajnych modeli SSD. Negatywnym aspektem jest to, że spadki wydajności występują z powodu dławienia termicznego. Notebook posiada miejsce na drugi dysk SSD PCIe Gen 4.

Dysk SSD PCIe-4 służy jako dysk systemowy.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7015 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2229 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 515.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 311.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4990 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1311 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.77 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 184.6 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	87.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	79.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.9 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.8 pt
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	67 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	64.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	44.1 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	36.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3520 (3490.23^min - 3519.95^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3396 (3160.41^min - 3395.84^max) MB/s +30%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3101 (2775.37^min - 3100.52^max) MB/s +18%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2228 - 4315, n=5)	2947 MB/s +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2620 (2568.07^min - 2619.97^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2506 (2484.56^min - 2506.33^max) MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	2253 (2206.83^min - 2252.55^max) MB/s -14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -33%
seq write
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4695 (4459.59^min - 4695.15^max) MB/s +93%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4252 (3845.2^min - 4251.56^max) MB/s +75%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s +56%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2749 (2612.84^min - 2749.11^max) MB/s +13%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1505 - 4923, n=5)	2663 MB/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2430 (1756.94^min - 2429.93^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2220 (2186.31^min - 2219.63^max) MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1671 (1641.02^min - 1670.59^max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -36%
seq q8 t1 read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7032 (6100.58^min - 7031.96^max) MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6037.07^min - 6660.97^max) MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6638 (5706.05^min - 6638.12^max) MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5729 (5328.06^min - 5728.58^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	5035 (4670.78^min - 5034.63^max) MB/s -12%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (3050 - 6418, n=5)	4966 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4294 (3669.6^min - 4293.91^max) MB/s -25%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	4958 (862.3^min - 4957.61^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4914 (4501.33^min - 4914.49^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4776 MB/s -4%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2869 - 4968, n=5)	4160 MB/s -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3613 (3580.5^min - 3612.97^max) MB/s -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2216 (2187.96^min - 2215.64^max) MB/s -55%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1773 (1734.23^min - 1773.16^max) MB/s -64%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
4k q1 t1 read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	76.7 (73.36^min - 76.74^max) MB/s +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	72.8 MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	63.2 (62.77^min - 63.18^max) MB/s +8%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (46.2 - 78.3, n=5)	58.6 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	58.3 (57.69^min - 58.29^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.4 (47.92^min - 48.42^max) MB/s -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.8 (32.61^min - 32.76^max) MB/s -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	391 (373.18^min - 391.21^max) MB/s +102%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	342 (331.18^min - 341.62^max) MB/s +76%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (117.2 - 393, n=5)	222 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	201 (197.55^min - 200.57^max) MB/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	193.9 (190.37^min - 193.9^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	159.6 (158.36^min - 159.58^max) MB/s -18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	132 (125.41^min - 131.99^max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	3789 (3765.64^min - 3788.53^max) MB/s
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3551 (3544.16^min - 3551.38^max) MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3335 (3259.03^min - 3334.54^max) MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3311 (3243.78^min - 3311.19^max) MB/s -13%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (615 - 4255, n=5)	2879 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s -33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1963 (1812.48^min - 1962.92^max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1705 (1701.1^min - 1704.63^max) MB/s -55%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -79%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3576 (3480.8^min - 3575.55^max) MB/s +182%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3275 (2719.74^min - 3275.22^max) MB/s +159%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2659 (2629.9^min - 2658.76^max) MB/s +110%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2193 (2174.06^min - 2193.44^max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +66%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (328 - 3869, n=5)	1849 MB/s +46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1585 (1554.44^min - 1585.47^max) MB/s +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1266 (1012.7^min - 1266.22^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -75%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -75%

AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8837 Points +48%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8452 Points +41%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	7213 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6392 Points +7%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2811 - 10092, n=5)	6342 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5988 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4261 Points -29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3315 Points -45%
Score Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3468 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3174 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2860 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2712 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2573 Points -10%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (986 - 3412, n=5)	2502 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1830 Points -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1116 Points -61%
Score Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3723 Points +96%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3621 Points +91%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3145 Points +66%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +64%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1346 - 4956, n=5)	2629 Points +38%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2475 Points +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1899 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1735 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1604 Points -16%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5449.25 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185.49 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4887.18 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4540.75 MB/s -17%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2256 - 5796, n=5)	4339 MB/s -20%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3886.94 MB/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3690.93 MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3466 MB/s -36%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4286.27 MB/s +347%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4081.48 MB/s +325%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3900.46 MB/s +306%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3805.55 MB/s +297%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +288%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (960 - 4914, n=5)	2972 MB/s +210%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1633.49 MB/s +70%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1295 MB/s +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	959.57 MB/s
4K Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	99.79 MB/s +107%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	97.96 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	62.76 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	58.79 MB/s +22%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (42.4 - 80.1, n=5)	56.7 MB/s +18%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	48.18 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.75 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	30.4 MB/s -37%
4K Write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	325.41 MB/s +117%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	286.81 MB/s +91%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +41%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (109.2 - 307, n=5)	185.4 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	169.41 MB/s +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	150.14 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	137.9 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	137.5 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	118.17 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2914.54 MB/s +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2593.07 MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2216.52 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2146.9 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2085.99 MB/s -6%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (713 - 2799, n=5)	2002 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1429.83 MB/s -35%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	739 MB/s -67%
4K-64 Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3195.33 MB/s +93%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2915.33 MB/s +76%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2546.59 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +53%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1064 - 4158, n=5)	2146 MB/s +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1779.79 MB/s +8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1652.79 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1468 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1411.25 MB/s -15%
Access Time Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.094 ms * -52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.079 ms * -27%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.066 ms * -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.062 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.058 ms * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.052 ms * +16%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (0.032 - 0.062, n=5)	0.0446 ms * +28%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.039 ms * +37%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.139 ms * -435%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.118 ms * -354%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (0.018 - 0.128, n=5)	0.0668 ms * -157%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -86%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.026 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.025 ms * +4%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.02 ms * +23%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.012 ms * +54%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Drive throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N: Ø4012 (3381.19-5725.73)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø5260 (1672.91-6655)

Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø5191 (3583.79-7029.65)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4351.17-5032.96)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3831 (253.34-6627.38)

Karta graficzna

Wyniki testów porównawczych GeForce RTX 4050 są powyżej średnich wyników dla RTX 4050 ("Balanced"). tryby "Performance" i "Turbo" skutkują w najlepszym przypadku minimalnym wzrostem wydajności.

Acer ustawił maksymalne TGP na 140 W - wyższa moc nie jest możliwa. Według testu The Witcher 3 nie jest nawet bliski wyczerpania. Przełączanie między dGPU a Optimusem nie wymaga restartu, ponieważ Advanced Optimus jest obsługiwany.

Fire Strike (zasilanie sieciowe, zbalansowane)

Fire Strike (zasilanie bateryjne, zrównoważone)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	94.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	81.7 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	77.3 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	75 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	70.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	68.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	59.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +42%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	40995 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	31690 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	30877 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	30717 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30298 Points -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	28934 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=38)	28641 Points -7%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	161152 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	157673 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	153301 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (51138 - 161152, n=25)	126416 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	105057 Points -35%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	54830 Points -66%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29853 Points +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	23204 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	22899 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22715 Points -2%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22522 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	22480 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=36)	21155 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +56%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	11868 Points +42%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	8692 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	8626 Points +3%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8597 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	8363 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	8152 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=36)	7812 Points -7%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		43233 pkt.
3DMark 11 Performance		24596 pkt.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47710 pkt.
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20291 pkt.
3DMark Time Spy Score		8227 pkt.
Pomoc

... porównanie

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	33 Seconds * -27%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	29 Seconds * -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=37)	28.8 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	27 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	26 Seconds *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	21 Seconds * +19%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=37)	56.2 Seconds * -12%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53 Seconds * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	52 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	52 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	50 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * +27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	35 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	481 Seconds *
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	399 Seconds * +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=37)	395 Seconds * +18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +22%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	374 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	364 Seconds * +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	301 Seconds * +37%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +38%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	243 Seconds * +49%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)	125975 Points +45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	117889 Points +35%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	104225 Points +20%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	87554 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	87135 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	86024 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	84557 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=35)	82571 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65110 Points -25%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points +42%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	55994 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (45884 - 59879, n=11)	53438 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	50695 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36222 Points -29%

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	108353 Points +57%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	83464 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	68870 Points
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9845 - 103262, n=12)	32694 Points -53%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	28137 Points -59%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22444 Points -67%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9845 Points -86%
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	120271 Points +42%
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	84452 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83483 Points -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81622 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	80466 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (66574 - 84452, n=12)	76353 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65701 Points -22%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU Vulkan
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years)	82317 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	79423 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	77343 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (4454 - 85084, n=18)	51089 Points -36%
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=109, last 2 years)	115663 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	84723 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83663 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (60815 - 86892, n=18)	78987 Points -7%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)	2181 mpaths +47%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1664 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1503 mpaths +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1485 mpaths
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1465 mpaths -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1458 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (618 - 1588, n=22)	1388 mpaths -7%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	1197 mpaths -19%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)	1568 mpaths +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1194 mpaths +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1079 mpaths +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1075 mpaths 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1073 mpaths
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1071 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (735 - 1174, n=22)	1033 mpaths -4%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	909 mpaths -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	300 mpaths -72%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths +95%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	14401 mpaths +86%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12169 mpaths +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (3562 - 14401, n=22)	10693 mpaths +38%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	10427 mpaths +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	10005 mpaths +29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9623 mpaths +24%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	9406 mpaths +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	7731 mpaths

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)	701 mpaths +45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	583 mpaths +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	507 mpaths +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	501 mpaths +3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	495 mpaths +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	485 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (333 - 565, n=32)	471 mpaths -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	390 mpaths -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	96 mpaths -80%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	24181 ksamples +117%
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)	21367 ksamples +92%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17623 ksamples +58%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	15817 ksamples +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5413 - 24181, n=32)	15639 ksamples +40%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14668 ksamples +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14627 ksamples +31%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	14218 ksamples +28%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	11139 ksamples

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (47.1 - 515, n=21, last 2 years)	307 fps +73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (177.8 - 188.3, n=3)	184 fps +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	177.8 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	230.8 fps +1161%
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps +104%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.3 - 21.4, n=4)	20.3 fps +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	18.3 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	17.5 fps -4%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	56.9 fps +100%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps +41%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	28.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25.7 - 30.1, n=4)	28.3 fps -1%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps +48%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	322.7 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (281 - 334, n=4)	307 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	281.4 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	201.6 fps -28%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.5 fps +74%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps +55%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	30.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (28.2 - 30.7, n=4)	29.2 fps -5%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20.6 fps -33%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	126.5 fps +60%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (79.3 - 94.5, n=4)	87.3 fps +10%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	86.5 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	79.3 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	73.4 fps +53%
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps +53%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53.9 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47.9 - 50.7, n=4)	49.3 fps +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	47.9 fps
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps +62%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	89.4 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (76.2 - 79.7, n=4)	78.2 fps +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	77.6 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	67.5 fps -13%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Wydajność w grach

Sprzęt został zaprojektowany do grania w rozdzielczości FHD przy wysokich i maksymalnych ustawieniach. W ten sposób można w pełni wykorzystać wysoką liczbę klatek na sekundę w rozdzielczości FHD ekranu i osiągnąć liczbę klatek na sekundę powyżej określonej średniej RTX 4050.

Technologia DLSS firmy Nvidia może zapewnić wzrost liczby klatek na sekundę. Jeśli jest ona aktywna, procesor graficzny oblicza grę w niższej rozdzielczości, a następnie skaluje ją do żądanej rozdzielczości za pomocą sztucznej inteligencji. DLSS musi być wyraźnie obsługiwany przez grę. Przetestowaliśmy kilka odpowiednich tytułów na zasadzie próbnej.

	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (Jakość)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (Zrównoważony)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (Wydajność)
Cyberpunk 2077 V1.6	24,9fps	43 fps	53,6 fps	58 fps
Spider-Man: Miles Morales	42,1 fps	54,2 fps	68,2 fps	68,4fps
The Witcher 3 V4.00	25.4 fps	30.1 fps	31.9 fps	33.2 fps
Hogwarts Legacy	34. 9 fps	43. 4 fps	44.5 fps	44.7 fps
Returnal	66 fps	81 fps	84 fps	91 fps

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	96.9 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	80.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.7 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	75.3 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	69.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68.9 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67.3 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +51%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.2 (98^min) fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	98.1 (84^min) fps +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.9 (71^min) fps
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.4 (75^min) fps -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	82.4 (31.1^min, 37.5^P0.1, 50.1^P1) fps -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=39)	75.4 fps -10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	64 fps -24%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +43%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.1 fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 fps +2%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84.7 fps +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 fps
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.6 fps -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (15.5 - 122.3, n=36)	76.4 fps -9%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +55%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	192.6 (25.1^min, 144.3^P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	151.2 (35.6^min, 115.5^P1) fps +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	147 fps 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	146.8 (93.6^min, 114.3^P1) fps
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	146.4 (27.5^min, 106.4^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	144 (76^min, 109.9^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (21.2 - 156.6, n=35)	134.4 fps -8%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	160.7 (136.8^min) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps +19%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.6^min) fps +14%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.3 (120.2^min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (73.5 - 175.6, n=36)	131.9 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	125.2 (109.9^min) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	115.8 (102.7^min) fps -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.8 (97.8^min) fps -8%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	117 fps +44%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	104.4 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (65 - 117, n=37)	92.9 fps +14%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.8 fps +7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.4 fps
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.8 fps -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76.3 fps -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps -30%

Aby sprawdzić, czy liczba klatek na sekundę pozostaje w dużej mierze stała przez dłuższy czas, uruchomiliśmy grę The Witcher 3 na około 60 minut w rozdzielczości Full HD i maksymalnych ustawieniach jakości. Postać w grze nie jest poruszana. Spadek liczby klatek na sekundę nie jest zauważalny.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø81.7 (71-84)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø59.6 (19-74)

Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø81 (77-86)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø82.2 (79-84)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø80.5 (77-85)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø111.1 (107-116)

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	307.8	262.4	156.2	83.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	151	136.5	132.1	125.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	187.4	116.2	83.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	115.3	101.6	81.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	131	114	108	102
Strange Brigade (2018)	355	209	169.3	146.8
F1 22 (2022)	207	198.1	166.8	52.9

Emisje: Acer Nitro 16 znacznie się nagrzewa

Emisja hałasu

Pomimo stale aktywnego dGPU, notebook jest cichy w codziennym użytkowaniu (biuro, Internet itp.). Zgodnie z oczekiwaniami inaczej wygląda to w trybie gamingowym.

Poziomy ciśnienia akustycznego dochodzące do 61 dB(A) ("Turbo") lub 56 dB(A) ("Performance") wymagają użycia słuchawek. Używany przez nas tryb "Zrównoważony" wychodzi na poziomie 45 dB(A). Ogólnie niższy poziom hałasu można uzyskać, korzystając z trybu "Quiet", ale oczywiście kosztem wydajności obliczeniowej.

Hałas

luz		25 / 26 / 27 dB
obciążenie		42 / 45 dB

	30 dB cichy 40 dB(A) słyszalny 50 dB(A) irytujący
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-7%	-15%	-26%	10%	-16%	-4%
off / environment *	24	25 -4%	24 -0%	27 -13%	23.3 3%	25 -4%	25.7 -7%
Idle Minimum *	25	25 -0%	24 4%	27 -8%	23.3 7%	26 -4%	25.7 -3%
Idle Average *	26	26 -0%	25.14 3%	35 -35%	23.3 10%	27 -4%	25.7 1%
Idle Maximum *	27	28 -4%	35.14 -30%	38 -41%	23.3 14%	32 -19%	26.3 3%
Load Average *	42	43 -2%	55.93 -33%	52 -24%	29.6 30%	57 -36%	33.9 19%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	51 -19%	54.62 -27%	56 -30%	43 -0%	50 -16%
Load Maximum *	45	53 -18%	56.34 -25%	59 -31%	43 4%	57 -27%	62 -38%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Temperatura

Nitro 16 wyraźnie nagrzewa się pod obciążeniem. W jednym z punktów pomiarowych osiągnięto temperaturę ponad 60°C.

W codziennym użytkowaniu temperatury mieszczą się w zielonej strefie, ale są wyższe niż w siostrzanym modelu ze względu na aktywny tryb dGPU.

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


51 °C	45 °C	48 °C
43 °C	45 °C	43 °C
41 °C	42 °C	41 °C

maks. w ogóle: 51 °C
średnia: 44.3 °C


57 °C	63 °C	46 °C
44 °C	52 °C	43 °C
33 °C	34 °C	34 °C

maks. w ogóle: 63 °C
średnia: 45.1 °C

zasilacz 51 °C | temperatura otoczenia 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
33 °C	34 °C	34 °C
31 °C	31 °C	32 °C

maks. w ogóle: 34 °C
średnia: 31.6 °C


31 °C	32 °C	31 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
28 °C	26 °C	26 °C

maks. w ogóle: 32 °C
średnia: 29.4 °C

zasilacz 36 °C | temperatura otoczenia 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


54 °C	44 °C	45 °C
42 °C	43 °C	42 °C
35 °C	41 °C	39 °C

maks. w ogóle: 54 °C
średnia: 42.8 °C


57 °C	61 °C	48 °C
45 °C	51 °C	41 °C
32 °C	32 °C	33 °C

maks. w ogóle: 61 °C
średnia: 44.4 °C

zasilacz 48 °C | temperatura otoczenia 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		10%	9%	8%	17%	19%	9%
Maximum Upper Side *	51	53 -4%	51 -0%	52 -2%	48.9 4%	41 20%	41.5 19%
Maximum Bottom *	63	48 24%	53 16%	54 14%	44.6 29%	39 38%	51.8 18%
Idle Upper Side *	34	30 12%	29 15%	28 18%	27.1 20%	31 9%	31.6 7%
Idle Bottom *	32	30 6%	30 6%	32 -0%	27.5 14%	29 9%	34.5 -8%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Test warunków skrajnych

Test obciążeniowy (Prime95 i Furmark w trybie ciągłym) to ekstremalny scenariusz testowania stabilności systemu pod pełnym obciążeniem. Procesor rozpoczyna test obciążeniowy z taktowaniem od 4,1 do 4,2 GHz, a rdzeń graficzny pracuje z częstotliwością od 2,3 do 2,4 GHz. W dalszej części testu taktowanie spada do 2,6 GHz (procesor) i 2,2 GHz (rdzeń graficzny).

Głośnik

Głośniki stereo generują przyzwoity, w dużej mierze pozbawiony basów dźwięk. Lepsze wrażenia dźwiękowe można uzyskać przy użyciu słuchawek lub głośników zewnętrznych.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Zarządzanie energią: Nitro 16 może osiągnąć bardzo dobre czasy pracy

Zużycie energii

Zużycie energii jest na normalnym poziomie dla zainstalowanego sprzętu. Tryb dGPU jest odpowiedzialny za wyższe zużycie energii w trybie bezczynności w porównaniu do siostrzanego modelu. Test warunków skrajnych i test Witcher 3 są uruchamiane przy stałym zużyciu energii. Dostarczony zasilacz (230 W) może w pełni zasilić laptopa pod obciążeniem.

Pobór mocy

wyłączony / stan wstrzymania	0.5 / W
luz	19 / 20 / 23 W
obciążenie	80 / 184 W


Legenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		20%	-32%	-10%	23%	13%	-7%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	19	7 63%	11.4 40%	15 21%	8 58%	5 74%	11.6 39%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average *	20	10 50%	16.7 16%	17 15%	12.1 39%	11 45%	15.6 22%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Maximum *	23	15 35%	25.8 -12%	24 -4%	12.5 46%	22 4%	16.5 28%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -16%
Load Average *	80	86 -8%	139 -74%	111 -39%	74.9 6%	96 -20%	155 -94%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -33%
Witcher 3 ultra *	125.8	160.6 -28%	265 -111%	174.1 -38%	136.6 -9%	145.2 -15%	154.8 -23%
Load Maximum *	184	172 7%	280 -52%	208 -13%	185 -1%	201 -9%	205 -11%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -35%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø125.8 (122.5-130.1)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø148.3 (146.6-151.8)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø20.1 (18.7-23)

Power consumption: External monitor

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø60.4 (57.4-64.1)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (100.6-116.5)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø136.8 (123.5-142.4)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø135 (128.8-144.2)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.2 (9.17-27)

Żywotność baterii

Nitro 16 osiąga czasy pracy wynoszące odpowiednio 11:00 h i 10:50 h w teście WLAN (wywoływanie stron internetowych za pomocą skryptu) i teście wideo (krótki film Big Buck Bunny FHD H.264 kodowany w pętli). Podczas obu testów funkcje oszczędzania energii notebooka są wyłączone, a jasność wyświetlacza jest ustawiona na około 150 cd/m². Moduły bezprzewodowe są również wyłączone na czas testu wideo.

Uwaga: Nitro wykazuje zwiększone zużycie energii w trybie bateryjnym w systemie Windows 11 (instalacja Acer, instalacja własna). W związku z tym czasy pracy są niższe niż w przypadku siostrzanego modelu Recenzja Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Laptop do gier z RTX 4070 i długim czasem pracy na baterii (WLAN: 5,5 vs. 9 h) przy tej samej pojemności baterii. Dlatego czasy pracy zostały określone pod Windows 10. Tutaj problem nie występuje.

Nie potrafimy wskazać przyczyny zwiększonego zużycia energii. Może to być problem naszego urządzenia testowego.

Wydajność akumulatora

luz		12h 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 115)		11h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 50min
obciążenie		2h 14min

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.35 Wh	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Czasy pracy		9%	-45%	-54%	-12%	-48%	-11%	-35%
Reader / Idle	721	1217 69%		425 -41%		399 -45%	729 1%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -22%
H.264	650	746 15%		132 -80%	747 15%	277 -57%	614 -6%	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -37%
WiFi v1.3	660	745 13%	355 -46%	317 -52%	701 6%	284 -57%	540 -18%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -43%
Load	134	52 -61%	77 -43%	76 -43%	59 -56%	89 -34%	105 -22%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -36%

Za

+ Jasny wyświetlacz WUXGA w formacie 16:10

+ panel 165 Hz z obsługą G-Sync

+ dwa gniazda PCIe 4 (M.2-2280)

+ podświetlana klawiatura (RGB)

+ Możliwość rozszerzenia pamięci roboczej

+ Pasta termoprzewodząca z ciekłego metalu

+ USB 4

+ Dostarczanie energii

+ bardzo dobre czasy pracy na baterii

Przeciw

- może być głośny pod obciążeniem

- znaczne nagrzewanie pod obciążeniem

- dławienie termiczne SSD

- mała przestrzeń dyskowa

Werdykt: Niedrogie wejście do świata gier

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE. Recenzja dostarczona przez firmę Nvidia.

Acer Nitro 16 został zaprojektowany z myślą o grach w rozdzielczości FHD przy wysokich i maksymalnych ustawieniach, ale sprawdza się również w innych obszarach (edycja wideo, renderowanie). ProcesorRyzen 5 7535HS i GeForce RTX 4050zapewniają niezbędną wydajność, a CPU i GPU mogą pracować ze stale wysokimi częstotliwościami taktowania.

Acer prezentuje dobrze zaokrąglony laptop do gier w segmencie podstawowym z Nitro 16.

Co zaskakujące, laptop nagrzewa się bardziej pod obciążeniem niż jego siostrzany model wyposażony w mocniejszy sprzęt. Modele Nitro nie mają ze sobą wiele wspólnego pod względem generowanego hałasu. Tryb "Zrównoważony" zapewnia umiarkowany hałas w tle.

16-calowy wyświetlacz (WUXGA) niewiele ustępuje panelowi (WQXGA) siostrzanego modelu. Ten drugi oferuje wyższą maksymalną jasność (400 nitów vs. 500 nitów). I tak już dobre czasy pracy Ryzen 7 Nitro są przewyższane przez obecny model, nawet jeśli tylko w systemie Windows 10. Pojemność pamięci masowej (512 GB) jest skromna jak na notebooka do gier.

Alternatywę można znaleźć w Asus TUF A15 FA507. Oferuje on większą wydajność procesora przy nieco lepszym czasie pracy na baterii. Płyta główna Gigabyte G7 KE byłby budżetową alternatywą, w której niższy poziom wydajności byłby równoważony niższą ceną zakupu (1050 euro). Jednak system operacyjny Windows nie jest objęty zakresem dostawy.

Cena i dostępność

W USA użytkownicy mogą zamówić niektóre warianty Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 na Amazon, które mają mocniejsze konfiguracje niż ta, którą recenzowaliśmy.

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE - 01/08/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Wykonanie

74 / 98 → 76%

Klawiatura

79%

Myszka

83%

Komunikacja

69 / 80 → 86%

Waga

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Akumulator

88 / 95 → 93%

Wyświetlacz

87%

Wydajność w grach

98%

Wydajność w programach użytkowych

95%

Temperatura

75 / 95 → 79%

Hałas

82 / 90 → 92%

Głośniki

81%

Kamerka

45 / 85 → 52%

Średnio

78%

87%

Gaming - Ważona średnia

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Laptopy > Recenzja Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Niedrogi laptop do gier z RTX 4050 i długim czasem pracy

Sascha Mölck, 2023-08-13 (Update: 2023-08-13)

Recenzja Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Niedrogi laptop do gier z RTX 4050 i długim czasem pracy

Trwałość.

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Porównanie rozmiarów

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Wydajność: Acer skupia się na Rembrandcie i Adzie Lovelace

Warunki testowe

Procesor

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

Wydajność systemu

Opóźnienie DPC

Pamięć masowa

Drive throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Karta graficzna

Wydajność w grach

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Emisje: Acer Nitro 16 znacznie się nagrzewa

Emisja hałasu

Temperatura

Test warunków skrajnych

Głośnik

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE audio analysis

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

Zarządzanie energią: Nitro 16 może osiągnąć bardzo dobre czasy pracy

Zużycie energii

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption: External monitor

Żywotność baterii

Za

Przeciw

Werdykt: Niedrogie wejście do świata gier

Cena i dostępność

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison