Recenzja Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: Laptop AMD z czasem pracy do 20 godzin

Name: Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Brand: Asus

Biegacz długodystansowy.

Asus wybrał sprzęt AMD - Ryzen 9 7940HS i Radeon RX 7600S - do zasilania laptopa do gier. Szybko reagujący ekran 16:10 o przekątnej 16 cali (WUXGA, 165 Hz, FreeSync) i doskonałe czasy pracy uzupełniają konfigurację.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/06/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen 4

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition - średniej klasy laptop do gier - opiera się na sprzęcie AMD: ARyzen-9-7940HSaPU iRadeon-RX-7600SgPU. Konkurenci to między innymiLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8iMSI Katana 15 B12VEK, MedionMedion Erazer Defender P40i Gigabyte G5 KE.

Aby uzyskać bardziej szczegółowe informacje na temat obudowy laptopa, łączności i urządzeń wejściowych, zapoznaj się z naszą recenzją identycznie zbudowanego siostrzanego modelu A16 Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition w recenzji: Notebook AMD pod patronatem 7 .

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (TUF Gaming A16 Rodzina)

Procesor

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Karta grafiki

AMD Radeon RX 7600S - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 2207 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.14003.25002, MUX Switch, AMD Smart Access Graphic

Pamięć

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Matryca

16.00 cali 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pikseli 142 PPI, BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, FreeSync, refleksująca: nie, 165 Hz

Chipset

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Dysk twardy

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 400 GB wolne miejsce

Karta dźwiękowa

Realtek ALC256

Złącza

2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 22.1 x 355 x 252

Akumulator

90 Wh, 5845 mAh litowo-polimerowy

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.184 kg, zasilacz: 548 g

Cena

1699 Euro

Odnośniki

Asus strona producenta
Asus sekcja

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	03/2023	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	04/2023	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	23.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Obudowa i łączność - niewielkie zmiany w porównaniu do siostrzanego modelu

W porównaniu do siostrzanego modelua16 ma dwukolorową obudowę. Tył pokrywy i spód obudowy mają kolor piaskowy ("Sandstorm"). Opcje łączności są również nieco inne: Jeden z dwóch portów USB-C został ulepszony do standardu USB-4.

Porównanie wielkości

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Gigabyte G5 KE Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

lewa strona: złącze zasilania, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), audio combo

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1622 (823^min - 1820^max) MBit/s +109%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1529 (623^min - 1608^max) MBit/s +97%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1445 (1373^min - 1515^max) MBit/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s +59%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921	908 (806^min - 973^max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	802 (579^min - 1120^max) MBit/s +3%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 925, n=42)	792 MBit/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1734 (1706^min - 1750^max) MBit/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1686 (1451^min - 1716^max) MBit/s +86%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1666 (840^min - 1685^max) MBit/s +84%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s +53%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1223 (1136^min - 1272^max) MBit/s +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921	899 (755^min - 936^max) MBit/s -1%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 984, n=43)	847 MBit/s -6%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (823-1820)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1685 (1451-1716)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)

ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: 15.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.28 ∆E

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

A16 jest wyposażony w ten sam panel 165 Hz, który można znaleźć w jego siostrzanym modelu siostrzanym modelu. Jego matowy 16-calowy wyświetlacz (1920 x 1200 pikseli, IPS) ma format 16:10 i zdobywa punkty dzięki obsłudze FreeSync, braku migotania PWM i szybkiej reakcji. Kontrast jest akceptowalny, ale jasność mogłaby być nieco lepsza.


292 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
298 cd/m²	301 cd/m²	303 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	284 cd/m²	299 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

BOE NE160WUM-NX2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 303 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 94 %
na akumulatorze: 301 cd/m²
kontrast: 1433:1 (czerń: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.265

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer Defender P40 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
Display		3%	-44%	-0%	-39%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	69.3	71.2 3%	38.1 -45%	68.3 -1%	40.7 -41%	69.4 0%
sRGB Coverage	97.3	98.8 2%	56.8 -42%	98.1 1%	61 -37%	97.8 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.7	73.3 4%	39.3 -44%	69.8 -1%	42.1 -40%	70.9 0%
Response Times		2%	-159%	10%	-79%	-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)	14.5 ?(7, 7.5) 7%	38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2) -149%	14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5) 6%	26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12) -71%	17 ?(8, 9) -9%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5.7, 4.3)	10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7) -4%	26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6) -168%	8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1) 13%	18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82) -87%	10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7) -1%
PWM Frequency
Screen		5%	-115%	7%	-113%	4%
Brightness middle	301	405.7 35%	261 -13%	364 21%	269 -11%	308 2%
Brightness	294	368 25%	258 -12%	343 17%	248 -16%	293 0%
Brightness Distribution	94	87 -7%	92 -2%	86 -9%	85 -10%	90 -4%
Black Level *	0.21	0.38 -81%	0.19 10%	0.28 -33%	0.5 -138%	0.23 -10%
Contrast	1433	1068 -25%	1374 -4%	1300 -9%	538 -62%	1339 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.79	1.65 8%	5.57 -211%	1.67 7%	4.54 -154%	1.47 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.48	4.2 -21%	20.6 -492%	2.78 20%	17.28 -397%	2.98 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.2	0.53 56%	4.63 -286%	1.14 5%	3.34 -178%	1.02 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.2 52%	3.19 -28%	1.4 44%	3.8 -52%	2.2 12%
Gamma	2.265 ^97%	2.3 ^96%	2.45 ^90%	2.091 ^105%	2.17 ^101%	2.228 ^99%
CCT	6157 ^106%	6453 ^101%	6146 ^106%	6568 ^99%	7408 ^88%	6228 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 4%	-106% / -106%	6% / 6%	-77% / -92%	-0% / 2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Ex działa, ekran ma dobre odwzorowanie kolorów: Odchylenie około 1,8 jest akceptowalne (DeltaE < 3). Kalibracja obniża ten wskaźnik do 1,2 i prowadzi do bardziej zrównoważonych odcieni szarości. Panel jest w stanie odwzorować całą przestrzeń kolorów sRGB, ale nie AdobeRGB i DCI P3. Jest to podobne do większości wyświetlaczy konkurencji.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.7 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.3 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Stabilny pod kątem widzenia panel IPS laptopa pozostaje czytelny pod każdym kątem. Możliwe jest oglądanie panelu na zewnątrz - o ile słońce nie świeci zbyt mocno.

Wydajność - Asus wykorzystuje moc AMD

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS to średniej klasy laptop do gier. Sprzęt AMD zapewnia niezbędną moc obliczeniową. Obecny model można nabyć za około 1700 dolarów.

Warunki testowania

Można przełączać się między trzema profilami wydajności specyficznymi dla producenta (patrz tabela) za pomocą kombinacji klawiszy "Fn" + "F5". Użyto profili "Wydajność" (benchmarki) i "Cichy" (testy baterii). Tryb GPU był ustawiony na "Standardowy" (= przełączanie grafiki). Centrum sterowania notebooka ("Armoury Crate") umożliwia tworzenie indywidualnych profili ("Manual"), które obejmują ustawienie krzywych PPT i wentylatora.

	Turbo	Wydajność	Cisza
Limit mocy 1 (HWInfo)	120 watów	105 watów	75 watów
Limit mocy 2 (HWInfo)	144 waty	114 watów	90 watów
Hałas (Wichter 3)	53 dB(A)	51 dB(A)	46 dB(A)
Wydajność (Witcher 3)	~100 fps	~100 fps	~94 fps

Procesor

Część procesoraRyzen-9-7940HS-APU (Phoenix, Zen 4) posiada osiem rdzeni obliczeniowych z 16 wątkami. Bazowa częstotliwość taktowania 4 GHz może zostać zwiększona do 5,25 GHz (jeden rdzeń). Zmierzone przez nas wyniki benchmarków są mniej więcej takie same, jak w przypadku wcześniej testowanych laptopów 7940HS. Użycie profilu "Turbo" prowadzi do nieco lepszej wydajności (4-5 procent).

Siostrzany model Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition w recenzji: Notebook AMD pod patronatem 7 Ryzen-7-7735HS-APU (Rembrandt R, Zen 3+) jest wyraźnie pokonany przez Ryzena 9, nawet przy tej samej liczbie rdzeni i tych samych limitach mocy. Dzięki lepszej architekturze i wyższym częstotliwościom taktowania, jego wydajność w przeliczeniu na wat jest wyższa.

Pokazuje to test pętli CB15: Ciągłe obciążenie wielowątkowe prowadzi procesor do pracy z niezmiennie wysokimi częstotliwościami taktowania turbo - niezależnie od wybranego profilu wydajności.

Uwaga: Szczegółowe informacje na temat zainstalowanego APU i jego architektury można przeczytać w naszym artykule analitycznymZen4.

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	78.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	74.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70.9 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	68.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	58.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	56.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54.6 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20341 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	19987 (10270.1^min - 19987.3^max) Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (15556 - 18131, n=10)	16867 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	15537 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13995 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	13155 Points -22%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1733 - 1832, n=10)	1788 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1697 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1668 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1629 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1561 Points -13%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	7710 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	6889 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6277 - 7111, n=10)	6604 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	6009 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5441 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5066 Points -23%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (680 - 714, n=10)	701 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	652 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	652 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	644 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	627 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	612 Points -13%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3230 (3008.42^min - 3230.23^max) Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3189 Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (2470 - 2848, n=10)	2673 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2299 (2235.89^min - 2298.72^max) Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	2253 (1876.44^min - 2253.14^max) Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2112 (1956.47^min - 2112.49^max) Points -21%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (277 - 288, n=10)	283 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	265 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	248 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	247 Points -13%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	245 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	243 Points -14%

Blender
v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	234 Seconds * -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	230 Seconds * -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	225 Seconds * -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	198 Seconds * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (182 - 202, n=9)	191.1 Seconds * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	151 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H (3.3.3)	441 Seconds * -47%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H (3.3.2)	423 Seconds * -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (3.3.3)	376 Seconds * -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)	345 Seconds * -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (287 - 331, n=10)	308 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (3.3.3)	301 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)	264 Seconds * +12%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	78076 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	72220 MIPS +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (66408 - 73434, n=10)	70912 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61292 MIPS -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	59034 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54380 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6417 - 6776, n=10)	6645 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5779 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5718 MIPS -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5552 MIPS -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	5537 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5383 MIPS -19%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14222 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14144 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (11207 - 12500, n=11)	11902 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	11198 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10260 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9836 Points -19%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1823 - 2032, n=11)	1983 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1777 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1667 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1647 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1574 Points -23%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	24.2 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (20.1 - 22.6, n=9)	21.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20.8 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	17.4 fps -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps -20%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	59.1 s * -42%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	57.7 s * -38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	49.8 s * -19%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	47 s * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (36.9 - 54.8, n=10)	45.4 s * -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	36.5 s * +12%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.5 sec * -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.493 sec * -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	0.4904 sec * -15%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4865 sec * -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.4769 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=10)	0.4297 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec *

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2666.7 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

188.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

283 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6571 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

702 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16907 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1791 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	94.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	91.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	88.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	71.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	63.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	60.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	28033 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (25226 - 29109, n=8)	27015 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	20413 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	16661 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15620 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	15397 KRay/s -45%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	12542 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	122098 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (106512 - 123214, n=8)	115513 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	103903 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	101275 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	77807 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	76434 Points -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	65919 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (4566 - 5119, n=8)	4877 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	4633 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	4566 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	3494 MB/s -23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	3412 MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	3244 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	3212 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	124433 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (118174 - 124783, n=8)	121129 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	113990 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	113837 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	104709 Points -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	87225 Points -30%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	80337 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	15380 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (14663 - 15551, n=8)	15145 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	13285 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	12691 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	10407 Points -32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	8694 Points -43%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	7388 Points -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	63432 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (56839 - 66238, n=8)	61581 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	55209 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	50250 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	38311 Points -40%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	37738 Points -41%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	31844 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (86309 - 169946, n=8)	128009 MB/s +48%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	110639 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	94177 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	86309 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	72510 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	66845 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	64725 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1339 MB/s +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	1089 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (866 - 1152, n=8)	1062 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	981 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	924 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	883 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	879 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	15209 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (13175 - 15675, n=8)	14510 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	11057 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	8923 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	8448 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	8145 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	6989 KRay/s -54%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s +33%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	37023 MPixel/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	36147 MPixel/s +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	36118 MPixel/s +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (29922 - 41024, n=8)	35306 MPixel/s +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	29922 MPixel/s
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	29085 MPixel/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	27871 MPixel/s -7%

Wydajność systemu

Płynnie działający system zapewnia wystarczającą wydajność dla wymagających obszarów zastosowań, takich jak renderowanie, edycja wideo i gry - dobre wyniki PCMark mogą to potwierdzić. Transfery pamięci RAM są na normalnym poziomie dla pamięci DDR5 4800 RAM. Co ważne: automatyczne przełączanie pomiędzy dGPU i iGPU (Smart Access Graphic) zawsze trwa sekundę lub dwie. W tym czasie system zawiesza się.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	7927 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7691 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7332 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	7201 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6909 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6892 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	11150 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	10872 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	10844 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10622 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10180 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	10505 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9744 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9475 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9332 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9131 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	12434 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	11868 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10790 Points -9%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9593 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9393 Points -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8957 Points -25%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1774 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1774 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1752 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1718 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points -6%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points +5%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1720 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1715 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1653 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1643 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1618 Points -6%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1992 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1990 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1840 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1778 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1710 Points -14%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1771 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1577 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1570 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1388 Points 0%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5937 pkt.
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6458 pkt.
PCMark 10 Score		7927 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (59712 - 78739, n=8)	65738 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58458 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57466 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56560 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	48549 MB/s -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44445 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67644 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67639 MB/s +10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65535 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (50399 - 61836, n=8)	60105 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	50338 MB/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47514 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (72541 - 91567, n=8)	81839 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65896 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57744 MB/s -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	57505 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	55012 MB/s -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46901 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	96.1 ns * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94.9 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93 ns * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (87.6 - 111.1, n=8)	92.7 ns * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	84.6 ns * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81.9 ns * +9%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienie DPC

Standardowy test monitora opóźnień (surfowanie po sieci, odtwarzanie wideo 4k, wysokie obciążenie Prime95) ujawnił pewne anomalie. System nie wydaje się być odpowiedni do edycji wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do poprawy lub nawet pogorszenia wydajności.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7213.9 μs * -539%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4343.1 μs * -285%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1002.5 μs * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	869.7 μs * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	237.9 μs * +79%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

Asus wyposażył A16 w dysk SSD o pojemności 512 GB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) firmy Micron - (zbyt) mało przestrzeni dyskowej jak na notebooka do gier. Zapewnia on przyzwoite prędkości przesyłu danych, ale nie jest jednym z najlepszych modeli wśród wszystkich dostępnych dysków SSD. Zwłaszcza szybkość zapisu jest znacznie poniżej dzisiejszych możliwości.

Dysk SSD PCIe-4 służy jako dysk systemowy.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4285 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1772 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 482 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2316 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1674 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	87.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	77.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	64.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	59.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	54.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	45 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	33.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5346 (4832.89^min - 5346.06^max) MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +55%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2501 (2479.67^min - 2500.68^max) MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2460 (2456.1^min - 2460.17^max) MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2390 (2088.15^min - 2390.38^max) MB/s +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2271.71^min - 2290.75^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	2253 (2206.83^min - 2252.55^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1748 - 2253, n=5)	1891 MB/s -16%
seq write
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4675 (4517.46^min - 4675.27^max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s +127%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2991 (2932.66^min - 2991.48^max) MB/s +79%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2903 (2823.62^min - 2902.74^max) MB/s +74%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2230 (2171.45^min - 2229.69^max) MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1671 (1641.02^min - 1670.59^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1519 - 1671, n=5)	1585 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1495 (1277.34^min - 1495.48^max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7127 (6535.15^min - 7127.37^max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s +47%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	5009 (4674.55^min - 5008.89^max) MB/s +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	4725 (4035.45^min - 4724.88^max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4633 (4029.05^min - 4633.45^max) MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4556 (3742.64^min - 4556.27^max) MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4294 (3669.6^min - 4293.91^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (3234 - 4294, n=5)	3728 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4903 (812.65^min - 4902.98^max) MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s +172%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4797 (4359.23^min - 4796.61^max) MB/s +171%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3415 (3353.98^min - 3415.42^max) MB/s +93%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3411 (3334.51^min - 3410.81^max) MB/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2255 (2245.25^min - 2255.17^max) MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1773 (1734.23^min - 1773.16^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1610 - 1773, n=5)	1682 MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	65.9 (62.88^min - 65.94^max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +101%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	62.6 (62.25^min - 62.63^max) MB/s +91%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	51.1 (49.74^min - 51.1^max) MB/s +56%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	35.5 (35.31^min - 35.47^max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.8 (32.61^min - 32.76^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)	31.9 MB/s -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	31.8 (31.24^min - 31.76^max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	369 (333.31^min - 369.47^max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	328 (300.52^min - 328.36^max) MB/s +148%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	281 (267.52^min - 281.12^max) MB/s +113%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	267 (258.43^min - 266.75^max) MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +68%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	181.3 (175.93^min - 181.25^max) MB/s +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	132 (125.41^min - 131.99^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (106.4 - 132, n=5)	123.7 MB/s -6%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3335 (3324.73^min - 3334.83^max) MB/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2889 (2819.64^min - 2889.22^max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +50%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2025 (1213.07^min - 2024.78^max) MB/s +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1705 (1701.1^min - 1704.63^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1678 (1211.7^min - 1678.15^max) MB/s -2%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1323 (1320.64^min - 1322.54^max) MB/s -22%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (766 - 1705, n=5)	1017 MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3737 (3683.15^min - 3737.15^max) MB/s +136%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2256.15^min - 2290.93^max) MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2234 (2227.81^min - 2234.36^max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1585 (1554.44^min - 1585.47^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1509 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1457 (1124.17^min - 1456.77^max) MB/s -8%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (313 - 1585, n=5)	595 MB/s -62%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9125 Points +114%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7599 Points +78%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	5903 Points +39%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	5541 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4261 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4020 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2845 - 4261, n=4)	3370 Points -21%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3235 Points +77%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2625 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2348 Points +28%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2128 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1830 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1726 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1031 - 1830, n=4)	1305 Points -29%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4288 Points +167%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3618 Points +126%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +94%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2404 Points +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2388 Points +49%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1604 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1257 - 1735, n=4)	1491 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1456 Points -9%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5856.12 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3976.53 MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3792 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	3697.92 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3690.93 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3667.76 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2798 - 3691, n=4)	3189 MB/s -14%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4750.28 MB/s +191%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3884.67 MB/s +138%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +128%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3020.8 MB/s +85%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2772 MB/s +70%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2106.21 MB/s +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1633.49 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1156 - 1633, n=4)	1329 MB/s -19%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	82.5 MB/s +93%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	77.12 MB/s +80%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +52%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	63.89 MB/s +49%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51.2 MB/s +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	49.25 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.75 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (30 - 42.8, n=4)	35.7 MB/s -16%
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	312.09 MB/s +164%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	276.66 MB/s +134%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	225 MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +79%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	207.32 MB/s +75%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	152.75 MB/s +29%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)	121.6 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	118.17 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2572.63 MB/s +80%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2194.79 MB/s +54%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1901.41 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s +31%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1675.54 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1429.83 MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1296 MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (721 - 1430, n=4)	953 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3536.78 MB/s +151%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3021.8 MB/s +114%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1949.13 MB/s +38%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1865.08 MB/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1411.25 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1003 - 1468, n=4)	1258 MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	954 MB/s -32%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)	0.095 ms * -64%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.08 ms * -38%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.066 ms * -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.058 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.05 ms * +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.044 ms * +24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.029 ms * +50%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)	0.1968 ms * -67%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.118 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.108 ms * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.105 ms * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.053 ms * +55%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * +59%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.033 ms * +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.013 ms * +89%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4694.47-5029.18)

Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10: Ø2113 (226.43-4712.52)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)

Karta graficzna

AMD Radeon RX 7600Soferuje 1792 shadery, jedną magistralę o szerokości 128 bitów i szybką pamięć GDDR6 (8 192 MB). Jego maksymalne TGP (95 watów) nie jest w pełni wykorzystywane zgodnie z testem Witcher 3 testu. Wyniki benchmarków są dokładnie takie, jak oczekiwano, a użycie profilu "Turbo" nie prowadzi do poprawy wydajności.

Konkurentów GPU średniej klasy można znaleźć w modelach GeForce RTX 4060,RTX 4050i RTX 3060w pełnych konfiguracjach (= maksymalne TGP). Choć nie jest w stanie dotrzymać kroku RTX 4060, to i tak w benchmarkach 3DMark poradziła sobie lepiej niż oba pozostałe modele GeForce. W praktycznym zastosowaniu w grach nie mogliśmy uzyskać spójnego obrazu: W zależności od gry, czasami jeden GPU radził sobie lepiej, czasami drugi - przynajmniej w testowanych przez nas grach.

Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, wydajność)

Fire Strike (zużycie baterii, wydajność)Fire Strike (zużycie baterii, wydajność) — Fire Strike (zużycie baterii, wydajność)

Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, turbo)

Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, cichy)

Fire Strike (podłączony do sieci, turbo, dGPU)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97.4 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	87.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	84.9 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	82.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	82 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	77.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	73.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	37654 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	36470 Points +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (33037 - 35278, n=4)	34188 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	33988 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	30959 Points -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	29569 Points -10%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	159354 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	157190 Points +1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (150582 - 164406, n=3)	156931 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	150582 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	136826 Points -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	27122 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	26561 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (25514 - 26154, n=3)	25856 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	25514 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	23443 Points -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22625 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10855 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10329 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (9080 - 9208, n=3)	9164 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9080 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8686 Points -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	8500 Points -8%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		55435 pkt.
3DMark 11 Performance		28721 pkt.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		64441 pkt.
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23346 pkt.
3DMark Time Spy Score		9530 pkt.
Pomoc

... porównanie

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | SPECviewperf 2020

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)	125975 Points +93%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	104225 Points +60%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	102522 Points +57%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	102369 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	100490 Points +54%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	87670 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	66133 Points +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (65110 - 66133, n=2)	65622 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65110 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points +98%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	55994 Points +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	48885 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36222 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (26646 - 36222, n=2)	31434 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	26646 Points -26%

Geekbench 6.0
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +76%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	96539 Points +47%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65701 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	65701 Points 0%
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	83464 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	83464 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points -42%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	4237 Points -95%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)	2181 mpaths
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1817 mpaths
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1690 mpaths
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	1197 mpaths
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)	1568 mpaths +423%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1231 mpaths +310%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1176 mpaths +292%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	909 mpaths +203%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)	300 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	300 mpaths 0%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	14543 mpaths +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	12370 mpaths +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)	12169 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	12169 mpaths 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	9406 mpaths -23%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)	701 mpaths +630%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )	618 mpaths +544%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )	480 mpaths +400%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	396 mpaths +313%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	390 mpaths +306%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )	96 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (83 - 96, n=2)	89.5 mpaths -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )	83 mpaths -14%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)	21367 ksamples +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )	19237 ksamples +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )	17623 ksamples
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (14759 - 17623, n=2)	16191 ksamples -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )	14759 ksamples -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	14218 ksamples -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	14118 ksamples -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )	13494 ksamples -23%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	231 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	230.8 fps
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps -84%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	17.5 fps -92%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	56.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	56.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps -29%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 fps -47%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps +29%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	323 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	322.7 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	201.6 fps -38%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	53.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps -11%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20.6 fps -61%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	126.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	126.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps -15%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	86.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	73.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	73.4 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53.9 fps -27%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps +86%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	89.4 fps +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	67.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	67.5 fps 0%

Wydajność w grach

FA617 jest przeznaczony do gier na wysokich i maksymalnych ustawieniach. Rozdzielczość pełnego ekranu (1,920 x 1,200 pikseli) może być używana. Wyższe rozdzielczości będą użyteczne po podłączeniu odpowiedniego wyświetlacza - z częściowo zredukowanymi ustawieniami. Profil "Turbo" nie zwiększa liczby klatek na sekundę.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	95.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95.4 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	87.2 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	75.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	74.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	70.1 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	67.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	65.6 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.6 (101^min) fps +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103 (89^min) fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (neu)	98.1 (84^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (91 - 98.1, n=2)	94.6 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	91 (77^min) fps -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps -15%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	119.6 (3.03^min, 76.9^P1) fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113.9 (5.92^min, 76.9^P1) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps +22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	103 (7.98^min, 71.4^P1) fps +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	92.9 (26.7^min, 62.5^P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92.2 (4.55^min, 55.6^P1) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (85.5 - 92.9, n=2)	89.2 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.5 (3.46^min, 62.5^P1) fps -8%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	109.8 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	100.8 fps +18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	90.3 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)	85.2 fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.3)	82.8 fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (78.2 - 85.2, n=2)	81.7 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)	78.2 fps -8%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +39%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	188.3 (28^min, 137.1^P1) fps +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (162.7 - 163.3, n=2)	163 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	162.7 (111.4^min, 120.7^P1) fps 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	153.3 (32.3^min, 117.2^P1) fps -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	148.7 (20.2^min, 114.3^P1) fps -9%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	161.8 (140.3^min) fps +33%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	144.3 (117.7^min) fps +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.3^min) fps +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.5 (121.2^min) fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (110 - 121.6, n=2)	115.8 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	110 (85.8^min) fps -10%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	121.9 fps +113%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.3 fps +91%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps +87%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97 fps +69%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.7 fps +51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (55 - 57.3, n=2)	56.2 fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	55 fps -4%

Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)	84.7 fps +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	70 (38^min) fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	67 (34^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	67 fps 0%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average of class Gaming (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)	73.5 fps +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	41 (16^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	41 fps 0%

Atomic Heart - 1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average of class Gaming (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)	72.8 fps +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	56.6 (31.1^min, 47.6^P0.1, 49.1^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	56.6 fps 0%

Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	76.7 (36.2^min, 50.2^P0.1, 56.6^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	76.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)	68.8 fps -10%

Resident Evil 4 Remake - 1920x1080 Max Preset
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	72.7 (14.6^min, 26.1^P0.1, 52.5^P1) fps +39%
Average of class Gaming (19.7 - 143.2, n=15, last 2 years)	70.7 fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	52.3 (6.38^min, 13.8^P0.1, 34.2^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	52.3 fps 0%

The Last of Us - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (31.6 - 105, n=13, last 2 years)	61.2 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	51.5 (4.4^min, 32.8^P0.1, 43.4^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	51.5 fps 0%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)	73.7 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	55.4 (27^min, 28.2^P0.1, 39^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	55.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)	46.3 fps +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	28.3 (13.7^min, 14.6^P0.1, 17.8^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	28.3 fps 0%

Company of Heroes 3 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average of class Gaming (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)	129 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	97.2 (41.4^P0.1, 54.7^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	97.2 fps 0%

Dead Island 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	148.5 (19.5^min, 20.4^P0.1, 94.8^P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	113.1 (18.3^min, 19^P0.1, 73^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	113.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 181.7, n=11, last 2 years)	97.9 fps -13%

Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (24.7 - 74, n=8, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	42.7 (29.5^min, 33.8^P0.1, 36.4^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	42.7 fps 0%

Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming (35 - 167, n=28, last 2 years)	110.6 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	104.7 (86^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	104.7 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average of class Gaming (71.9 - 119, n=9, last 2 years)	93.6 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	78.5 (36^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	78.5 fps 0%

Aby sprawdzić, czy liczba klatek na sekundę pozostaje w dużej mierze stała przez dłuższy czas, uruchomiliśmy grę The Witcher 3 na około 60 minut w rozdzielczości Full HD i maksymalnych ustawieniach jakości. Postać w grze nie była poruszana. Nie odnotowaliśmy spadku wydajności.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø96.9 (93-103)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-104)

Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.8 (81-91)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	184.7		171.7	92.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	382		166.5	98.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	157.5	143.1	132.2	121.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	215	117.2	85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	85.1	72	57.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	135	120	115	108
Strange Brigade (2018)	440	228	190.8	163.3
Metro Exodus (2019)	187.3	116.5
The Division 2 (2019)	232	167	131	95
Control (2019)	235	116.6	83.5
Doom Eternal (2020)	376	209	184.3	179
Gears Tactics (2020)	381.4	216.1	138.1	95.4
Death Stranding (2020)	189.5	144.1	133.6	129.6
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)	134.9	85.5	60.1	42.7
Crysis Remastered (2020)	294	190.9	90.6	38.6
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	122.6	118.5	106.6	69.5
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	203	124	102	88
Hitman 3 (2021)	270	178.2	157.4	145.7
Far Cry 6 (2021)	151	133	119	104.7
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	197	144	135	74
GRID Legends (2022)	214.9	182.8	156.5	129.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	198.1	156.8	105.7	82.2
F1 22 (2022)	263	244	190	50.5
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	98.2	78	66.1	55.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	118.4	88.7	72	55.4
Returnal (2023)	91	88	78	67
Atomic Heart (2023)	167.1	125.5	71.6	56.6
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	143.4	125.9	97.4	97.2
Sons of the Forest (2023)	93.2	81.4	78	76.7
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)	107.4	83.2	78.9	52.3
The Last of Us (2023)	81.4	67.6	60.2	51.5
Dead Island 2 (2023)	201	168.1	122.7	113.1

Emisje - FA617XS może być dość głośny

Emisja hałasu

W codziennym użytkowaniu (biuro, Internet itp.), A16 zazwyczaj pracuje cicho, często bezgłośnie - niezależnie od wybranego profilu. Poziom ciśnienia akustycznego może wzrosnąć do 53 dB(A) ("Turbo") lub 51 dB(A) ("Performance") w trybie gry. Ogólnie niższą emisję hałasu można uzyskać korzystając z profilu "Quiet". Moc obliczeniowa jest wtedy zmniejszona tylko w bardzo niewielkim stopniu.

Hałas

luz		25 / 26 / 28 dB
obciążenie		43 / 53 dB

	30 dB cichy 40 dB(A) słyszalny 50 dB(A) irytujący
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Noise		8%	7%	-11%	-11%	3%
off / environment *	25	23 8%	24 4%	25 -0%	19.52 22%	24 4%
Idle Minimum *	25	23.1 8%	24 4%	26 -4%	31.05 -24%	24 4%
Idle Average *	26	23.1 11%	24 8%	27 -4%	31.05 -19%	25 4%
Idle Maximum *	28	26.6 5%	24 14%	32 -14%	31.05 -11%	28 -0%
Load Average *	43	34.7 19%	37.71 12%	53 -23%	55.66 -29%	42 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	47.6 7%	45.75 10%	56 -10%	55.7 -9%	50 2%
Load Maximum *	53	54.8 -3%	54.55 -3%	64 -21%	55.51 -5%	50 6%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Temperatura

Notebook nagrzewa się zauważalnie pod obciążeniem, ale nie nadmiernie. W codziennym użytkowaniu temperatury mieszczą się w zielonej strefie. To ostatnie nie miało miejsca w siostrzanym modelu- zakładamy błąd/wadę urządzenia.

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


50 °C	53 °C	45 °C
40 °C	47 °C	44 °C
38 °C	26 °C	31 °C

maks. w ogóle: 53 °C
średnia: 41.6 °C


48 °C	44 °C	46 °C
37 °C	33 °C	37 °C
27 °C	25 °C	30 °C

maks. w ogóle: 48 °C
średnia: 36.3 °C

zasilacz 54 °C | temperatura otoczenia 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	27 °C
30 °C	29 °C	30 °C
30 °C	28 °C	27 °C

maks. w ogóle: 30 °C
średnia: 28.8 °C


29 °C	29 °C	30 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

maks. w ogóle: 30 °C
średnia: 28.4 °C

temperatura otoczenia 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


47 °C	49 °C	43 °C
40 °C	44 °C	43 °C
34 °C	30 °C	30 °C

maks. w ogóle: 49 °C
średnia: 40 °C


47 °C	44 °C	45 °C
36 °C	31 °C	35 °C
26 °C	26 °C	28 °C

maks. w ogóle: 47 °C
średnia: 35.3 °C

zasilacz 52 °C | temperatura otoczenia 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Heat		1%	-8%	9%	-14%	-17%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	42.8 19%	47 11%	42 21%	52.6 1%	54 -2%
Maximum Bottom *	48	50 -4%	48 -0%	45 6%	62.4 -30%	47 2%
Idle Upper Side *	30	29.6 1%	35 -17%	28 7%	33.6 -12%	40 -33%
Idle Bottom *	30	34 -13%	38 -27%	30 -0%	34.8 -16%	40 -33%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Test warunków skrajnych

Test obciążeniowy (Prime95 i Furmark w trybie ciągłym) symuluje ekstremalny scenariusz w celu przetestowania stabilności systemu pod pełnym obciążeniem. Procesor (3,4 do 3,5 GHz) i karta graficzna (~1500 MHz) przeszły test z częstotliwościami taktowania poniżej odpowiedniego zegara bazowego.

Głośniki

Głośniki stereo generują ogólnie przyzwoity dźwięk.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Zarządzanie energią - laptop do gier o świetnych czasach pracy

Zużycie energii

Nie ma żadnych nieprawidłowości pod względem zużycia energii. Wskaźniki są na normalnym poziomie dla zainstalowanego sprzętu. Test warunków skrajnych i Witcher 3 zostały przeprowadzone przy stałym zużyciu energii. Moc zasilacza (240 W) jest więcej niż wystarczająca.

Pobór mocy

wyłączony / stan wstrzymania	0.1 / W
luz	7 / 10 / 15 W
obciążenie	86 / 172 W


Legenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-107%	2%	-25%	-16%	-7%	-4%	-66%
Idle Minimum *	7	24.5 -250%	8.5 -21%	8 -14%	7.66 -9%	8 -14%	7.5 ?(7 - 8, n=2) -7%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -93%
Idle Average *	10	29.2 -192%	10.2 -2%	12 -20%	10.3 -3%	11 -10%	10.5 ?(10 - 11, n=2) -5%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -89%
Idle Maximum *	15	34.3 -129%	11.3 25%	18 -20%	16.05 -7%	16 -7%	15.5 ?(15 - 16, n=2) -3%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -78%
Load Average *	86	98.7 -15%	84 2%	101 -17%	115.8 -35%	97 -13%	91.5 ?(86 - 97, n=2) -6%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	160.6	178.6 -11%	128 20%	180.8 -13%	168.7 -5%	161.5 -1%
Load Maximum *	172	249.6 -45%	189 -10%	284 -65%	234.6 -36%	168 2%	170 ?(168 - 172, n=2) 1%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -45%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø160.6 (159.6-162.3)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø159.3 (157.9-160.8)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.82 (7.33-14.6)

power consumption with external monitor

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.9 (91.1-102.9)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.1 (98.2-128)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø156.4 (155-168.2)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø156.5 (155.1-169.5)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17 (11.6-29.8)

Żywotność baterii

16-calowe urządzenie osiągnęło czasy pracy wynoszące odpowiednio 12:25 h i 12:26 h w naszym teście WLAN (wywoływanie stron internetowych za pomocą skryptu) i teście wideo (krótki film Big Buck Bunny (kodowanie H.264, FHD) w pętli). Podczas obu testów funkcje oszczędzania energii laptopa były wyłączone, a jasność wyświetlacza ustawiona na około 150 cd/m². Moduły łączności bezprzewodowej również były wyłączone na czas testu wideo

FA617 zapewnił doskonałe czasy pracy i pozostawił konkurencję w kurzu. Połączenie oszczędnego APU i dużej pojemności baterii zdecydowanie się tutaj opłaca.

Wydajność akumulatora

luz		20h 17min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 113)		12h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 26min
obciążenie		0h 52min

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Czasy pracy		-53%	-20%	-29%	-39%	23%	-21%
Reader / Idle	1217	401 -67%		528 -57%		1212 0%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -54%
H.264	746		264 -65%	339 -55%	130 -83%		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -45%
WiFi v1.3	745	205 -72%	260 -65%	373 -50%	342 -54%	724 -3%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -50%
Load	52	41 -21%	89 71%	76 46%	62 19%	90 73%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 64%
Witcher 3 ultra					79		78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Za

+ matowy wyświetlacz WUXGA (165 Hz) w formacie 16:10

+ dobra wydajność systemu

+ dwa gniazda M.2 (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)

+ rozszerzalna pamięć RAM

+ USB 4

+ Power Delivery

+ świetna żywotność baterii

Przeciw

- może być głośny pod obciążeniem

- Niskiej klasy dysk SSD z niewielką ilością pamięci

- przeciętna szybkość transmisji danych WLAN

- gąbczaste sprzężenie zwrotne klawiatury

- rozczarowująca kamera internetowa

Werdykt - laptop Asusa z (zbyt) małą ilością pamięci masowej

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS, urządzenie testowe dostarczone przez Asus Germany.

A16 jest skonfigurowany do gier w rozdzielczości WUXGA przy wysokich i maksymalnych ustawieniach, ale powinien być przydatny w wielu innych dziedzinach, takich jak edycja wideo i renderowanie. Zespół AMD składający się zRyzen 9 7940HSiRadeon RX 7600Szapewniają laptopowi niezbędną wydajność. Oba podzespoły pracują z niezmiennie wysokimi częstotliwościami taktowania.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition to dobrze zaokrąglony laptop do gier średniej klasy, którego imponujące czasy pracy na baterii są jego dumą i radością.

W porównaniu doRyzen-7-7735HSaPU znajdującym się w jegosiostrzanym modelu, 7940HS-APU ma do zaoferowania znacznie lepszą wydajność procesora, pomimo posiadania tej samej liczby rdzeni i tych samych limitów mocy. Tutaj daje o sobie znać nowoczesna architektura (Zen 4 vs. Zen 3+) i wyższe częstotliwości taktowania.

Niesamowite czasy pracy urządzenia są z pewnością jego wyjątkową zaletą: jego praktyczne pomiary wynoszące około 12,5 godziny nie są generalnie osiągane przez wiele innych laptopów biurowych. Pozytyw: Baterię można ładować za pomocą zasilacza USB-C (min. 65 W, 20 V) - jeden port USB-C obsługuje Power Delivery. Własny zasilacz niekoniecznie musiałby być noszony przy sobie.

Zainstalowany wyświetlacz IPS (16 cali, 1920 x 1200 pikseli) ma przyjazne dla pracy proporcje 16:10 i ogólnie pozostawił na nas dobre wrażenie - jeśli już, to jasność mogłaby być nieco większa. Zainstalowany dysk SSD klasy podstawowej idealnie nadawałby się do prostego laptopa biurowego - ale nie do laptopa do gier za 1700 USD. Oferowana pamięć masowa (512 GB) i dane ani nie spełniają wymagań użytkowników, ani nie spełniają ich oczekiwań.

TheLegion Pro 5 16IRX8może być odpowiednią alternatywą. Charakteryzuje się lepszą wydajnością i jaśniejszym ekranem niż A16 - ale wyraźnie nie ma do zaoferowania tak imponujących czasów pracy. TheGigabyte G5 KEmoże być dobrą budżetową alternatywą: Otrzymujesz podobny poziom wydajności graficznej za znacznie niższą cenę. Chociaż: Ten laptop nie jest dostarczany z preinstalowanym systemem operacyjnym Windows.

Cena i dostępność

Wersję A16 z 16 GB pamięci RAM i 512 GB dyskiem SSD można kupić na stronie Asusa za około 1371 dolarów.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS - 05/06/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Wykonanie

79 / 98 → 81%

Klawiatura

77%

Myszka

92%

Komunikacja

63 / 80 → 79%

Waga

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Akumulator

89 / 95 → 94%

Wyświetlacz

88%

Wydajność w grach

99%

Wydajność w programach użytkowych

96%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Hałas

79 / 90 → 87%

Głośniki

77%

Kamerka

39 / 85 → 46%

Średnio

79%

87%

Gaming - Ważona średnia

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 337 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 456849 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Laptopy > Recenzja Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: Laptop AMD z czasem pracy do 20 godzin

Sascha Mölck, 2023-06- 8 (Update: 2023-06- 8)

Recenzja Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: Laptop AMD z czasem pracy do 20 godzin

Biegacz długodystansowy.

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Obudowa i łączność - niewielkie zmiany w porównaniu do siostrzanego modelu

Porównanie wielkości

Wyświetlacz - panel 16:10 z pokryciem sRGB

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Wydajność - Asus wykorzystuje moc AMD

Warunki testowania

Procesor

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

Wydajność systemu

Opóźnienie DPC

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Karta graficzna

Wydajność w grach

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Emisje - FA617XS może być dość głośny

Emisja hałasu

Temperatura

Test warunków skrajnych

Głośniki

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

Zarządzanie energią - laptop do gier o świetnych czasach pracy

Zużycie energii

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

power consumption with external monitor

Żywotność baterii

Za

Przeciw

Werdykt - laptop Asusa z (zbyt) małą ilością pamięci masowej

Cena i dostępność

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison