Recenzja Medion S10 OLED: Multimedialny laptop z panelem OLED i procesorem Core Ultra 7

Name: Medion S10 OLED
Brand: Medion

Robi to powoli.

Medion S10 to smukły laptop multimedialny z procesorem Meteor Lake, 16 GB pamięci RAM i żywym panelem OLED (4k, DCI-P3, 16 cali) o proporcjach 16:10. Godny pochwały: Pamięć RAM można wymienić/rozbudować. Całość kosztuje około 1400 USD.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 31/07/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Arc Intel Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Windows

Medion S10 OLED to smukły, kompaktowy laptop multimedialny o przekątnej 16 cali. Wyposażony jest w procesor Core Ultra 7 155H, 16 GB pamięci RAM, dysk SSD o pojemności 1 TB i wyświetlacz OLED o wysokim kontraście. Wśród konkurentów znajdują się takie urządzenia jak Apple MacBook Air 15, Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9, Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16, Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 i Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16.

Test device courtesy of Medion DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Medion S10 OLED

Procesor

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H

Karta grafiki

Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, rdzeń: 2250 MHz, Dual-Channel, 31.0.101.5593

Pamięć

16 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Matryca

16.00 cali 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pikseli 283 PPI, Samsung SDC4174, OLED, DCI-P3, refleksująca: tak, 60 Hz

Chipset

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH

Dysk twardy

Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7, 1024 GB

, 864 GB wolne miejsce

Karta dźwiękowa

Realtek ALC269

Złącza

5 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 blokada Kensingtona, gniazda audio: Headset combined port, 1 czytnik linii papilarnych, TPM 2.0

Łączność

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 17.8 x 355 x 245

Akumulator

70 Wh, 6065 mAh litowo-polimerowy

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Inne

głośniki: Stereo, klawiatura: Chiclet, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

1.59 kg, zasilacz: 500 g

Cena

1299 Euro

Odnośniki

Medion strona producenta
Medion sekcja

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
76.7 %	v8	07/2024	Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.6 kg	17.8 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.9 kg	17.5 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
80.2 %	v8	07/2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1.5 kg	12.3 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.9 kg	15.9 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.5 kg	12.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
91.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03/2024	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU	1.5 kg	11.5 mm	15.60"	2880x1664

Prosimy pamiętać: Niedawno zaktualizowaliśmy nasz system oceny i wyniki wersji 8 nie są porównywalne z wynikami wersji 7. Więcej informacji znajdą Państwo tutaj.

Obudowa i łączność - Brak USB 4 dla S10

Medion upakował technologię S10 w kompaktowej, eleganckiej metalowej obudowie (stop aluminium i magnezu) z wąskimi ramkami. Zastosowana kolorystyka (ciemnoszaro-antracytowo-czarna) podkreśla poważny wygląd laptopa. Urządzenie zostało dobrze zbudowane i waży około 1,6 kg, co jest na równi z konkurencją. Jego stabilność i sztywność są w porządku. Maksymalny kąt otwarcia pokrywy wynosi około 160 stopni.

Posiada łącznie 5 portów USB (3x USB-A, 2x USB-C) - niestety działają one tylko zgodnie ze standardem USB 3.2 Gen 1. Urządzenie z oznaczeniem S10 powinno przynajmniej zapewniać użytkownikom USB 4 lub Thunderbolt 4, aby w razie potrzeby móc korzystać z zewnętrznego GPU. Niemniej jednak porty USB-C obsługują DP Alt-Mode i Power Delivery - wypróbowaliśmy to. Laptop oferuje zatem łącznie trzy wyjścia wideo (1x HDMI, 2x DP).

Moduł bezprzewodowy laptopa zawiera układ WiFi 6E (Intel AX211), który zapewnia ogólnie dobrą lub bardzo dobrą szybkość transmisji danych. Wbudowana kamera internetowa (2,1 MP) jest dość standardowa, ale zyskuje punkty dzięki włącznikowi/wyłącznikowi. Brakuje portu Gigabit Ethernet i czytnika kart pamięci.

Porównanie rozmiarów

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Medion S10 OLED LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 DIN A4 ❌

Lewa strona: złącze zasilania, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), HDMI, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DP Alt-Mode), audio combo

Prawa strona: przycisk resetowania, włącznik/wyłącznik kamery internetowej, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), gniazdo na blokadę kabla

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort	1698 (1601^min, 1625.07^P1 - 1722^max) MBit/s +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1656 (1459^min, 1468.28^P1 - 1743^max) MBit/s +41%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1625 (1307^min, 1314.54^P1 - 1751^max) MBit/s +38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800	1588 (1549^min - 1614^max) MBit/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years)	1363 MBit/s +16%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242)	1231 MBit/s +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1177 (955^min - 1409^max) MBit/s
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	823 (328^min - 1046^max) MBit/s -30%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	671 (610^min - 705^max) MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort	1756 (1717^min, 1719.9^P1 - 1808^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800	1749 (1685^min - 1765^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1666 (1613^min, 1621.7^P1 - 1691^max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1666 (1617^min, 1623.96^P1 - 1687^max) MBit/s +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1651 (1601^min - 1666^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)	1451 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242)	1382 MBit/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	901 (877^min - 918^max) MBit/s -45%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	901 (728^min - 937^max) MBit/s -45%

Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1177 (955-1409)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1656 (1459-1743)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1549-1614)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø671 (610-705)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (328-1046)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1625 (1307-1751)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1698 (1601-1722)

Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1650 (1601-1666)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1666 (1617-1687)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1748 (1685-1765)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø901 (877-918)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø900 (728-937)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1666 (1613-1691)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1756 (1717-1808)

ColorChecker Medion S10 OLED: 7.08 ∆E min: 3.23 - max: 13.62 ∆E

Zrównoważony rozwój

Opakowanie urządzenia składa się głównie z kartonu i papieru. Ilość użytego plastiku jest ograniczona: Zasilacz znajduje się w przezroczystej torbie, a laptop w włóknistej torbie wykonanej z przetworzonego PET. Wnętrze kartonowej pokrywy pokryte jest cienką warstwą pianki. Powinna istnieć możliwość przeprowadzenia prac konserwacyjnych i naprawczych - sprzęt jest dostępny po zdjęciu płyty bazowej. Aktualizacje oprogramowania powinny być zapewnione przez kilka następnych lat za pośrednictwem funkcji aktualizacji systemu Windows. Medion nie udostępnił jeszcze żadnych sterowników ani oprogramowania do laptopa na swojej stronie internetowej. Zalecamy zatem utworzenie kopii zapasowej folderu sterowników na partycji odzyskiwania.

Urządzenia wejściowe - S10 ma podświetlane klawisze

Medion zainstalował w laptopie podświetlaną klawiaturę typu chiclet z trzykolumnową klawiaturą numeryczną. Wklęsłe klawisze (krótki skok, wyraźny punkt nacisku) są przyzwoite do pisania, ale ich opór mógłby być nieco wyraźniejszy. Klawiatura nie kołysze się w przód i w tył podczas pisania. Klawisze strzałek i dwa klawisze "Enter" są dość małe. Z kolei wielodotykowy clickpad ze szklaną powierzchnią jest bardzo duży (ok. 14 x 9,6 cm).

Wyświetlacz - OLED, DCI-P3, 16:10

16-calowy ekran (3,840 x 2,400 pikseli) o proporcjach 16:10 oferuje krótki czas reakcji typowy dla OLED i świetny poziom czerni. Odblaskowa powierzchnia wyświetlacza w połączeniu z jasnością tuż powyżej celu niestety w większości ogranicza S10 do użytku w pomieszczeniach. Czytanie na zewnątrz byłoby możliwe tylko w cieniu lub w pochmurny dzień. Nasze urządzenie pomiarowe zarejestrowało migotanie ekranu (60 Hz) na wszystkich poziomach jasności. Wynika to z regulacji jasności panelu.


303 cd/m²	308 cd/m²	314 cd/m²
301 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	313 cd/m²
301 cd/m²	305 cd/m²	312 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

Samsung SDC4174 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 314 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 307.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 96 %
na akumulatorze: 307 cd/m²
kontrast: 30700:1 (czerń: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.08
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.197

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion S10 OLED Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6", 60 Hz
Display		-25%	-0%	-3%	-1%	-0%	-4%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	63.3 -37%	99.5 0%	98.8 -1%	99.8 0%	99.5 0%	98.7 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	95.2 -5%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.6	65.3 -34%	97.5 -1%	89.9 -9%	94.6 -4%	97.5 -1%	87.8 -11%
Response Times		-709%	138%	-1575%	-150%	138%	-1495%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	1.7 ?(0.9, 0.8)	15 ?(7.4, 7.6) -782%	0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) 62%	39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -2206%	6 ?(3.5, 2.5) -253%	0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) 62%	35.3 ?(16.4, 17.9) -1976%
Response Time Black / White *	1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7)	10.3 ?(5.6, 4.7) -636%	0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) 51%	14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) -943%	14 ?(10.5, 3.5) -900%	0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) 51%	15.6 ?(5.2, 10.4) -1014%
PWM Frequency	60 ?(100)		240 ?(100) 300%		481 702%	240 ?(100) 300%
Screen		-383%	18%	-418%	18%	18%	-393%
Brightness middle	307	368 20%	385 25%	520 69%	420 37%	385 25%	526 71%
Brightness	307	368 20%	391 27%	510 66%	421 37%	391 27%	506 65%
Brightness Distribution	96	91 -5%	97 1%	93 -3%	99 3%	97 1%	92 -4%
Black Level *	0.01	0.31 -3000%		0.35 -3400%	0.006 40%		0.37 -3600%
Contrast	30700	1187 -96%		1486 -95%	70000 128%		1422 -95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.1	2.4 -14%	1.1 48%	2.9 -38%	1.66 21%	1.1 48%	1.4 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.87	6.5 -33%	1.8 63%	6.2 -27%	4.92 -1%	1.8 63%	2 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.08	0.8 62%		1.1 47%	3.39 -63%		0.6 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.9	4.5 -400%	1.4 -56%	4.3 -378%	1.3 -44%	1.4 -56%	2.1 -133%
Gamma	2.197 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.19 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.24 ^98%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6513 ^100%	6324 ^103%	6444 ^101%	7422 ^88%	6609 ^98%	6444 ^101%	6865 ^95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-372% / -353%	52% / 43%	-665% / -494%	-44% / -20%	52% / 43%	-631% / -467%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Podano dokładność odwzorowania kolorów: Trzy popularne przestrzenie kolorów (AdobeRGB, sRGB, DCI-P3) mogą być reprodukowane całkowicie lub prawie całkowicie. Wyświetlacz zapewnia również dobre odwzorowanie kolorów zaraz po wyjęciu z pudełka: z odchyleniem około 2,1, cel (DeltaE < 3) jest spełniony. Kalibracja nie powoduje żadnych ulepszeń.

CalMAN: nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.9 ms rise
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz
Amplitude: 90 %

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Wydajność - Meteor Lake czasami działa powoli

Dzięki procesorowi Meteor Lake, smukły 16-calowy laptop zapewnia wystarczającą moc obliczeniową do zastosowań biurowych i multimedialnych, a także niektórych oszczędnych gier. Testowane urządzenie jest dostępne w cenie około 1400 USD. Model z procesorem Core i5-13420H (Raptor Lake), dyskiem SSD 512 GB i wyświetlaczem QHD+ (IPS) kosztuje od około 870 USD.

Warunki testowania

Laptop nie oferuje żadnych własnych profili wydajności. Dostępne są standardowe profile Windows (patrz tabela) - my korzystaliśmy z profilu zrównoważonego (benchmarki, test baterii). Nie udało nam się stwierdzić żadnych różnic w wydajności pomiędzy profilami.

	Najlepsza wydajność	Zrównoważony	Najlepsza oszczędność energii
Limit mocy 1 (HWInfo)	45 watów	45 watów	45 watów
Limit mocy 2 (HWInfo)	60 watów	60 watów	60 watów
Hałas (CP 2077 Phantom)	-	42 dB (A)	-
Wydajność (CP 2077 Phantom)	-	14 fps	-

Procesor

Procesor Core Ultra 7 155H16 rdzeni CPU (6P, 8E, 2LPE; Meteor Lake) ma łącznie 22 wątki. Procesor reaguje na ciągłe obciążenie wielowątkowe (pętla CB15) ze stałym wzrostem wydajności. Uzyskane wartości benchmarków są na równi ze średnią CPU.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2345 (2300.97-2382.8)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2651 (2550.53-2701.61)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1662 (1576.29-1694.92)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Max Cooling: Ø1797 (1605.27-2243.28)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1568 (1267.75-1932.27)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2016 (1825.4-2515.57)

CB15 Loop (najlepsza oszczędność energii)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	84.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	83.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	79 pt
Average of class Multimedia	78.7 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	78.3 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	76.6 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 ^-9! Apple M3	74.3 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	64.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ^-2! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	58.2 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17780 Points +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17401 Points +12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15564 Points
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)	15500 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15171 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=48)	14932 Points -4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12708 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	10298 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	9410 Points -40%
Single Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	1900 Points +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1777 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)	1769 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1759 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=48)	1725 Points -4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1569 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1287 Points -29%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6947 Points +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6671 Points +8%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6164 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5865 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=46)	5794 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years)	5687 Points -8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4947 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	3555 Points -42%
CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	670 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=46)	664 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)	651 Points -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	611 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	480 Points -31%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2745 (2259.12^min - 2745.18^max) Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2702 (2550.53^min - 2701.61^max) Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2516 (1825.4^min - 2515.57^max) Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=52)	2446 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years)	2445 Points +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2383 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2243 (1605.27^min - 2243.28^max) Points -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1932 (1267.75^min - 1932.27^max) Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1695 (1576.29^min - 1694.92^max) Points -29%
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	268 Points +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	259 Points
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)	258 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	254 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=48)	249 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	235 Points -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	210 Points -19%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	99.6 Points -62%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	494 Seconds * -145%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	351 Seconds * -74%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	291 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -25%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=44)	233 Seconds * -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	224 Seconds * -11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	202 Seconds *
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	195 Seconds * +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	190 Seconds * +6%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68535 MIPS +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68254 MIPS +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61091 MIPS +4%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60219 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=46)	59045 MIPS 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	58874 MIPS
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	49667 MIPS -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	43764 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5716 MIPS +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5562 MIPS
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5496 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5486 MIPS -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5458 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=46)	5345 MIPS -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	5242 MIPS -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5159 MIPS -7%

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	14646 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years)	13814 Points +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13501 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13291 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12422 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=51)	12280 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	12066 Points +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11646 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11581 Points
Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	3130 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2751 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years)	2720 Points +10%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2464 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2459 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2440 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2414 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=48)	2376 Points -4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2132 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13276 Points +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12975 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12158 Points +8%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)	12061 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=48)	12022 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11269 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	10570 Points -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10277 Points -9%
Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	2350 Points +31%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)	1826 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1814 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1796 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1764 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=48)	1752 Points -2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1462 Points -19%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20.3 fps +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.8 fps +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.7 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=46)	16.4 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14.2 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6.69 fps -60%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66.4 s * -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	53.6 s * -11%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)	49.2 s * -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=45)	48.8 s * -1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48.2 s *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.7 s * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.1 s * +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	40.9 s * +15%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	0.647 sec * -38%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.526 sec * -13%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.4845 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45)	0.4825 sec * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4692 sec * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4688 sec * -0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4675 sec *
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4626 sec * +1%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2383 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

142.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

259 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6164 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

691 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1801 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15564 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	99.4 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	85.8 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	83.4 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	70.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	50.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17004 KRay/s +16%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14712 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14392 KRay/s -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14272 KRay/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13431 KRay/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46)	13107 KRay/s -11%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	7376 KRay/s -50%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6583 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87764 Points +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77094 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76175 Points
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72601 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46)	69549 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68747 Points -10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	67895 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	19477 Points -74%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3969 MB/s +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3545 MB/s +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3508 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3385 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3320 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46)	3249 MB/s -7%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	3212 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2893 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90675 Points +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88106 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85567 Points +10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	84273 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	83844 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46)	83603 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78009 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	68857 Points -12%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10647 Points +18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10012 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9521 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9325 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46)	9130 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9030 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	6136 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1664 Points -82%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	43855 Points +14%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	38466 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37438 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36124 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	34153 Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46)	33785 Points -12%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	18236 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15344 Points -60%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	83176 MB/s +20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46)	78103 MB/s +13%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75931 MB/s +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72068 MB/s +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	70521 MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69238 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69000 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68954 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1160 MB/s +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1041 MB/s +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	1038 MB/s +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1004 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	966 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46)	962 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	934 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	617 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8903 KRay/s +12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7936 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7814 KRay/s -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7584 KRay/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6970 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46)	6853 KRay/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	3794 KRay/s -52%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	3597 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	53611 MPixel/s +37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	52218 MPixel/s +34%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	51992 MPixel/s +33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	51338 MPixel/s +32%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46)	46590 MPixel/s +19%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40793 MPixel/s +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	39025 MPixel/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	34213 MPixel/s -12%

Wydajność systemu

Aplikacje biurowe, internetowe i multimedialne, a także oszczędne gry nie sprawiają żadnych problemów płynnie działającemu systemowi. Benchmarki systemowe potwierdzają dobry poziom wydajności. Konkurencja wyposażona w ten sam procesor często wypada lepiej - wyższe limity mocy i bardzo szybka, wlutowana na stałe pamięć RAM LPDDR5X dają tutaj o sobie znać. Z kolei Medion S10 stawia na modularną pamięć RAM DDR5-5600. Poniższy wykres ilustruje różnice w szybkości.

Pamięć RAM działa w trybie dwukanałowym.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	7186 Points +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	6994 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6789 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32)	6732 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	6713 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6247 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5480 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	11289 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	11079 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10964 Points +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32)	10563 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10515 Points +11%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	9459 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8482 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	8927 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8919 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32)	8749 Points +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8470 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8343 Points +2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8215 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7348 Points -11%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9999 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	9993 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9194 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32)	9011 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8885 Points +4%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8513 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7166 Points -16%

CrossMark / Overall
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1771 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1751 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years)	1719 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1699 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32)	1655 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1546 Points -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1469 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1384 Points -19%

CrossMark / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1704 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1685 Points +2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1656 Points
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years)	1628 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31)	1581 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1447 Points -13%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1378 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1293 Points -22%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years)	1932 Points +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1916 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1911 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1848 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31)	1817 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1803 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1679 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1537 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1572 Points +2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1539 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1514 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years)	1441 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31)	1396 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1237 Points -20%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1190 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1106 Points -28%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	454 Points +77%
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years)	319 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	285 Points +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	279 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32)	276 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	275 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	256 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	213 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	311 Points +33%
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years)	262 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	259 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	257 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27)	254 Points +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	252 Points +8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	246 Points +5%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	234 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	642 ms * -12%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms *
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33)	541 ms * +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	528 ms * +8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	528 ms * +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	517 ms * +10%
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years)	503 ms * +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	422.3 ms * +26%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

PCMark 10 Score		6247 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	94158 MB/s +41%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93443 MB/s +40%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	91209 MB/s +36%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	91070 MB/s +36%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46)	83126 MB/s +24%
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	69078 MB/s +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66880 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63495 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	125604 MB/s +70%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	90142 MB/s +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87063 MB/s +18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85824 MB/s +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46)	80035 MB/s +9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	78395 MB/s +6%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73708 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	70185 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75937 MB/s +15%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	75906 MB/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75823 MB/s +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46)	72600 MB/s +10%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	70291 MB/s +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69181 MB/s +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66061 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45265 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	233 ns * -66%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46)	143.6 ns * -2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	140.2 ns *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.9 ns * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	137.6 ns * +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	125.8 ns * +10%
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	107 ns * +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	8.8 ns * +94%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienia DPC

Wysokie opóźnienia związane ze sterownikami uniemożliwiają użytkownikom edycję wideo i audio w czasie rzeczywistym. Jednak przyszłe aktualizacje oprogramowania mogą doprowadzić do zmian.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2995.3 μs *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2447.2 μs * +18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1736.9 μs * +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	824.4 μs * +72%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	600.7 μs * +80%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

Dysk SSD PCIe 4 (M.2-2280, 1 TB) od Phison zapewnia dobre prędkości transferu - ale nie należy do czołówki dysków SSD. Pozytywne: Nie odnotowaliśmy dławienia termicznego. S10 posiada drugie gniazdo na dysk SSD.

Dysk SSD PCIe 4 służy jako dysk systemowy.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3641 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3270 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 630.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 356 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2063 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3264 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 59.27 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 196.4 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	80.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	75.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	73.2 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	70.5 pt
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	68.9 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	65.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	65.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	48.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3237 (3127.1^min - 3236.53^max) MB/s +58%
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2979 MB/s +45%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2749 (2718.97^min - 2748.53^max) MB/s +34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2652 (2626.88^min - 2652.48^max) MB/s +29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2254 (2201.38^min - 2254.23^max) MB/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2188 (2167.89^min - 2188.41^max) MB/s +7%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2049 (2028.99^min - 2049.34^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1973 - 2049, n=2)	2011 MB/s -2%
seq write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3229 (3069.6^min - 3229.15^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3127 MB/s -3%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (2721 - 3229, n=2)	2975 MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2916 (2664.35^min - 2915.5^max) MB/s -10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2722 (2647.18^min - 2721.68^max) MB/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2330 (2272.26^min - 2329.73^max) MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2328 (2307.7^min - 2328.26^max) MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	557 (554.49^min - 557^max) MB/s -83%
seq q8 t1 read
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6621 (6016.94^min - 6621.13^max) MB/s +82%
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5465 MB/s +50%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	5148 (4531.57^min - 5148.3^max) MB/s +41%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3727 (3040.66^min - 3726.94^max) MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3645 (2982.87^min - 3645.22^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (3504 - 3645, n=2)	3575 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3562 (3054.5^min - 3562.01^max) MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	3331 (2575.51^min - 3331.12^max) MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4961 (4947.18^min - 4960.81^max) MB/s +52%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4195 MB/s +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3925 (3848.76^min - 3924.82^max) MB/s +20%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3269 (3263.59^min - 3269^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (3263 - 3269, n=2)	3266 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2409 (2377.61^min - 2408.59^max) MB/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2344 (1404.04^min - 2343.99^max) MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	555 (553.17^min - 554.85^max) MB/s -83%
4k q1 t1 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	80.8 (80.01^min - 80.76^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	63.4 MB/s +5%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	60.5 (59.69^min - 60.52^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (56 - 60.5, n=2)	58.3 MB/s -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	54.8 (51.93^min - 54.84^max) MB/s -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	54.1 (52.53^min - 54.09^max) MB/s -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	51.2 (49.25^min - 51.22^max) MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	40.3 (38.77^min - 40.27^max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	206 (197.33^min - 206.13^max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	193 (186.4^min - 192.95^max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	190.9 (186.79^min - 190.93^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	172 MB/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	167.7 (152.89^min - 167.68^max) MB/s -19%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (126.4 - 206, n=2)	166.2 MB/s -19%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	101.1 (92.92^min - 101.07^max) MB/s -51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	69.4 (65.86^min - 69.42^max) MB/s -66%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1947 (1678.71^min - 1946.99^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1821 (1804.4^min - 1821.4^max) MB/s -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1684 (1639.23^min - 1684.06^max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1407 MB/s -28%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (751 - 1947, n=2)	1349 MB/s -31%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	744 (687.95^min - 744^max) MB/s -62%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	588 (581.91^min - 587.83^max) MB/s -70%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	387 (351.99^min - 386.95^max) MB/s -80%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2441 (2399.8^min - 2440.79^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1643 (1597.74^min - 1643.45^max) MB/s -33%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (333 - 2441, n=2)	1387 MB/s -43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1142 (1093.19^min - 1142.3^max) MB/s -53%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1059 MB/s -57%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	373 (367.24^min - 373.12^max) MB/s -85%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	343 (332.92^min - 343.02^max) MB/s -86%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	230 (216.81^min - 229.87^max) MB/s -91%

AS SSD
Score Total
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6090 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5122 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5101 Points -16%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (3773 - 6090, n=2)	4932 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	4643 Points -24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	4369 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3893 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2761 Points -55%
Score Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2411 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1795 Points -26%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1016 - 2411, n=2)	1714 Points -29%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1646 Points -32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1511 Points -37%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1293 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	955 Points -60%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	887 Points -63%
Score Write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3283 Points +35%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2674 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2619 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2437 Points
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (2281 - 2437, n=2)	2359 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2107 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1962 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1334 Points -45%
Seq Read
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5026.81 MB/s +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	4728 MB/s +65%
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4257 MB/s +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	3264 MB/s +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3252 MB/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3189 MB/s +11%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2868.99 MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (2784 - 2869, n=2)	2826 MB/s -1%
Seq Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2934 MB/s +1%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2908.39 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2791 MB/s -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2714 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2654 MB/s -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2368.24 MB/s -19%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1634 - 2908, n=2)	2271 MB/s -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2260 MB/s -22%
4K Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	69.8 MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	68.68 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	64.1 MB/s -7%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	64.05 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	62 MB/s -10%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (52 - 68.7, n=2)	60.3 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	51.5 MB/s -25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	46.9 MB/s -32%
4K Write
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.9 MB/s +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	182.5 MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	178.65 MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (166 - 178.7, n=2)	172.3 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	168.8 MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	161.7 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	143.4 MB/s -20%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	139.13 MB/s -22%
4K-64 Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2055.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1407 MB/s -32%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (686 - 2056, n=2)	1371 MB/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1158 MB/s -44%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1138 MB/s -45%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	726.75 MB/s -65%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	577 MB/s -72%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	350 MB/s -83%
4K-64 Write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2906.67 MB/s +48%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2204 MB/s +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2164 MB/s +10%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1967.43 MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1952 - 1967, n=2)	1960 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1653 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1567 MB/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	925 MB/s -53%
Access Time Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.07 ms *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.062 ms * +11%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (0.052 - 0.07, n=2)	0.061 ms * +13%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.05499 ms * +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	0.041 ms * +41%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.037 ms * +47%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.033 ms * +53%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.022 ms * +69%
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.101 ms * -261%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06101 ms * -118%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.032 ms * -14%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -4%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.028 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	0.028 ms * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.026 ms * +7%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (0.023 - 0.028, n=2)	0.0255 ms * +9%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3612 (3081.97-3641.23)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5265 (4532.36-6169.85)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3316 (2576.65-3331.75)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3215 (2929.72-3237.37)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6074 (3285.54-6606.66)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3477 (2383.41-3561.17)

Karta graficzna

Podczas gdy procesor zapewnia dość dobry poziom wydajności, Intel Arc 8 iGPU nie wykorzystuje swojego potencjału. Konkurencja wyposażona w ten sam GPU osiągnęła od 30 do 50 procent lepsze wyniki zarówno w benchmarkach, jak i podczas uruchamiania gier. Dlaczego? Po pierwsze, GPU S10 nigdy nie osiąga maksymalnej częstotliwości taktowania (2250 MHz), a po drugie, konkurenci mają na pokładzie szybszą pamięć RAM (DDR5-5600 vs LPDDR5X-7466).

GPU jest w stanie poradzić sobie z wieloma oszczędnymi grami, nawet przy obniżonej wydajności - ale ustawienia muszą zostać zmniejszone. Stabilna liczba klatek na sekundę jest możliwa - co udowodnił Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom.

Time Spy (zbalansowany, podłączony do sieci)

Steel Nomad Light Stress (zbalansowany, podłączony do sieci)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66.5 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	65.5 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	65.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	60.3 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	57.6 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	35.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)	20510 Points +124%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13539 Points +48%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13381 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12099 Points +32%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8064 - 13716, n=35)	11984 Points +31%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9156 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6515 Points -29%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)	14739 Points +132%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9692 Points +52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9650 Points +52%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9216 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8886 Points +40%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5568 - 9692, n=39)	8302 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6414 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6365 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)	5566 Points +111%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3786 Points +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3770 Points +43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3656 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3426 Points +30%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (2018 - 3770, n=42)	3231 Points +22%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2643 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1739 Points -34%

3DMark 11 Performance		9522 pkt.
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5865 pkt.
3DMark Time Spy Score		2962 pkt.
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2356 pkt.
Pomoc

... porównanie

Blender | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10

Blender
v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	514 Seconds * -48%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=38)	430 Seconds * -24%
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years)	424 Seconds * -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	412 Seconds * -19%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	347 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	344 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	339 Seconds * +2%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (208 - 261, n=13)	228 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years)	209 Seconds *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	203 Seconds *

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Multimedia (10769 - 122560, n=86, last 2 years)	60430 Points +145%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	50682 Points +105%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33472 Points +35%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32336 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	30876 Points +25%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17193 - 37639, n=41)	30130 Points +22%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24714 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32938 Points +51%
Average of class Multimedia (2104 - 62587, n=47, last 2 years)	28644 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25116 Points +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24711 Points +13%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (2104 - 32938, n=42)	23923 Points +9%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	21880 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2104 Points -90%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 116455, n=61, last 2 years)	53765 Points +116%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48462 Points +95%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35957 Points +44%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35855 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35154 Points +41%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17911 - 39941, n=41)	32332 Points +30%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24915 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	20783 Points -17%
GPU Vulkan
Average of class Multimedia (11351 - 92135, n=48, last 2 years)	34403 Points +20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33886 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33442 Points +17%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33133 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32858 Points +15%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (16515 - 37129, n=40)	31483 Points +10%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	28575 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	24011 Points -16%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark - CPU
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11001 mpaths
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8242 - 13309, n=16)	10403 mpaths -5%
Average of class Multimedia (5027 - 19998, n=38, last 2 years)	9977 mpaths -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6990 mpaths -36%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Multimedia (45 - 684, n=64, last 2 years)	276 mpaths +203%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	98 mpaths +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93 mpaths +2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	91 mpaths
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	84 mpaths -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	82 mpaths -10%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (47 - 99, n=28)	78.3 mpaths -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	63 mpaths -31%
CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18280 ksamples +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17556 ksamples +9%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16064 ksamples
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15574 ksamples -3%
Average of class Multimedia (7035 - 30140, n=64, last 2 years)	15525 ksamples -3%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (9582 - 18829, n=28)	14468 ksamples -10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12820 ksamples -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	10333 ksamples -36%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	79.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	57.5 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	56.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	51.8 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	50.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	42 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	41.5 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 80.7, n=55, last 2 years)	35.2 fps +148%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	25.7 (15.9^min) fps +81%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	21.5 (9.21^min, 15.1^P0.1, 17.5^P1) fps +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.9 (14^min) fps +54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.2 (12.2^min) fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.7 (15.8^min) fps +46%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (13 - 24.7, n=24)	20.3 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	14.9 (11.6^min) fps +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.2 (11.8^min) fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years)	54 fps +374%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	21.5 (2.75^min, 12.5^P1) fps +89%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	16 (2.73^min, 11.4^P1) fps +40%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	15.9 (2.93^min, 11.4^P1) fps +39%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (9.59 - 20.6, n=34)	14.8 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.3 (1.247^min, 7.75^P1) fps +25%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	11.4 (1.718^min, 8.77^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)	52 fps +149%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	42 fps +101%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.6 fps +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.5 fps +46%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (14.7 - 31.7, n=41)	24.9 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.4 fps +17%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.9 fps -24%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years)	89.9 fps +153%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	60 (43^min, 46.4^P1) fps +69%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	55 fps +54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	53 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	47 fps +32%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (27.1 - 58.9, n=37)	45 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	38 fps +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.6 (5^min, 6.04^P1) fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years)	96.5 fps +59%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	88.7 (74.7^min) fps +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	80.6 (55.9^min) fps +33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	79.8 (51.5^min) fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	73.6 (51.1^min) fps +21%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (35.2 - 80.9, n=41)	67.1 fps +11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	60.6 (38.4^min) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	53 (39.7^min) fps -13%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=83, last 2 years)	66.9 fps +122%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	60.1 fps +99%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (27.9 - 43.9, n=42)	35 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	33.5 fps +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	33.5 fps +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	32.4 fps +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.2 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø13.8 (11.3-15.8)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Ø12.8 (12.3-13.2)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø22.4 (20.3-24.2)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø21.5 (20-22.5)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	144	131.8	32.3	11.4	9.23	9.14
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	95.1	83.4	64.1	60.6		31.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	51.9	29.7	20.9		15.9	8.98
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	47.6	36	30.2			19.3
Strange Brigade (2018)	129.8	51.1	43.8	35.6	25.7	14.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	22.1	17.6	15.4	14.7	10.4	5.42
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	23.3	19	16.3	14.2	9.21

Emisje i moc - Słabe wartości

Emisja hałasu

Pomimo mniejszej mocy obliczeniowej, S10 wytwarza nieco więcej hałasu niż konkurencja: Pod pełnym obciążeniem odnotowaliśmy poziom hałasu do 48 dB(A), podczas gdy Cyberpunk działał na poziomie 42 dB(A). Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, mógłby być cichszy. Podczas codziennego użytkowania oba wentylatory w dużej mierze się powstrzymują.

Hałas

luz		26 / 27 / 28 dB
obciążenie		43 / 48 dB

	30 dB cichy 40 dB(A) słyszalny 50 dB(A) irytujący
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
Noise		4%	17%	12%	3%	8%
off / environment *	25	24.1 4%	24.6 2%	24.4 2%	25.2 -1%	24.6 2%
Idle Minimum *	26	24.1 7%	24.6 5%	24.4 6%	25.2 3%	24.6 5%
Idle Average *	27	24.1 11%	24.6 9%	24.4 10%	26.3 3%	24.6 9%
Idle Maximum *	28	28.2 -1%	24.6 12%	24.4 13%	26.7 5%	26.4 6%
Load Average *	43	44.4 -3%	28.1 35%	32 26%	31.8 26%	40 7%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	42		32.4 23%		52 -24%
Load Maximum *	48	44.4 7%	32.4 32%	39.7 17%	45.1 6%	40 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *		36.5		30.6		40

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Temperatura

Temperatura znacznie wzrasta przy pełnym obciążeniu: W kilku punktach pomiarowych zarejestrowaliśmy wartości powyżej 50 °C. Wartości te były niższe podczas korzystania z Cyberpunka. Temperatury podpórki pod nadgarstki zawsze mieściły się w zielonym zakresie. Podsumowując, S10 nagrzewa się bardziej niż konkurencja.

Test obciążeniowy (Prime95 i Furmark w trybie ciągłym) sprawdza stabilność systemu pod pełnym obciążeniem. Początkowo procesor działał z prędkością (< 3 GHz) znacznie poniżej zegara bazowego, a rdzeń graficzny pracował z częstotliwością 750 MHz. Następnie taktowanie CPU wahało się między 1 a 2,5 GHz. Gdy tylko procesor zmniejszył częstotliwość taktowania, częstotliwość taktowania GPU wzrosła do 1,4-1,5 GHz.

w stresie

na luzie

Cyberpunk


55 °C	53 °C	43 °C
47 °C	39 °C	36 °C
30 °C	30 °C	29 °C

maks. w ogóle: 55 °C
średnia: 40.2 °C


46 °C	55 °C	53 °C
41 °C	48 °C	39 °C
33 °C	33 °C	32 °C

maks. w ogóle: 55 °C
średnia: 42.2 °C

zasilacz 55 °C | temperatura otoczenia 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Cyberpunk


30 °C	31 °C	29 °C
30 °C	32 °C	28 °C
28 °C	27 °C	27 °C

maks. w ogóle: 32 °C
średnia: 29.1 °C


30 °C	33 °C	33 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	28 °C	28 °C

maks. w ogóle: 33 °C
średnia: 29.4 °C

zasilacz 33 °C | temperatura otoczenia 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Cyberpunk


47 °C	47 °C	40 °C
44 °C	44 °C	35 °C
30 °C	30 °C	29 °C

maks. w ogóle: 47 °C
średnia: 38.4 °C


43 °C	46 °C	48 °C
41 °C	43 °C	38 °C
32 °C	34 °C	32 °C

maks. w ogóle: 48 °C
średnia: 39.7 °C

zasilacz 50 °C | temperatura otoczenia 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).

	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat		27%	17%	19%	3%	24%
Maximum Upper Side *	55	36.3 34%	44.3 19%	40.3 27%	49 11%	40.9 26%
Maximum Bottom *	55	39.1 29%	51.6 6%	45.9 17%	48.5 12%	42.6 23%
Idle Upper Side *	32	24.9 22%	25.1 22%	26.3 18%	33.5 -5%	24.5 23%
Idle Bottom *	33	26.1 21%	25.8 22%	27.9 15%	35 -6%	24.8 25%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Głośniki

Głośniki stereo generują przyzwoity dźwięk, ale prawie bez basów.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Zużycie energii

Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, zużycie energii przez laptopa jest na normalnym poziomie dla zainstalowanego sprzętu. Jednak S10 wymaga więcej energii niż konkurencja w trybie bezczynności. Podczas gdy Cyberpunk był uruchamiany ze stałym poborem mocy, zapotrzebowanie wahało się i spadało podczas testu warunków skrajnych. Moc zasilacza (90 W) jest wciąż wystarczająca. Zwiększone zapotrzebowanie urządzenia na początku testu obciążeniowego nie spowodowało żadnych problemów.

Pobór mocy

wyłączony / stan wstrzymania	0.4 / W
luz	7 / 10 / 19 W
obciążenie	52 / 95 W


Legenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Power Consumption		15%	39%	-2%	-21%	38%
Idle Minimum *	7	3.5 50%	4.2 40%	4.2 40%	10.15 -45%	3.6 49%
Idle Average *	10	9.6 4%	5.6 44%	11.6 -16%	11.65 -17%	5.7 43%
Idle Maximum *	19	9.9 48%	7.8 59%	12.3 35%	14.33 25%	6.1 68%
Load Average *	52	62.7 -21%	28.3 46%	61.9 -19%	67.5 -30%	52.5 -1%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	49.2		38.2 22%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	53.2		38.8 27%		85.3 -60%
Load Maximum *	95	101.2 -7%	61.9 35%	140.6 -48%	91.7 3%	64.7 32%
Witcher 3 ultra *		55.8		57		46.6

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Medion S10 OLED; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø80.5 (66-94.6)

Medion S10 OLED; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.65 (6.84-19.1)

Medion S10 OLED; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø53.2 (51-54.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

Medion S10 OLED; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø78.1 (71-94.7)

Medion S10 OLED; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.2 (48.3-75.5)

Medion S10 OLED; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø45.3 (42.8-53.4)

Medion S10 OLED; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.14 (3.64-19)

Medion S10 OLED; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø49.2 (45.8-50.6)

Czas trwania

Medion obiecuje czas pracy do 8 godzin (odtwarzanie wideo). Wydaje nam się to realistyczne: S10 zakończył nasz test WiFi (mapowanie obciążenia podczas uzyskiwania dostępu do stron internetowych za pomocą skryptu) po 7:16 godzinach. Jest to najgorsza wartość wśród laptopów w polu porównawczym - zarówno w wartościach bezwzględnych, jak i pod względem watogodzin.

Wydajność akumulatora

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 126)

7h 16min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh	983 min +125%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh	756 min +73%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	686 min +57%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh	644 min +48%
Average of class Multimedia (279 - 1204, n=88, last 2 years)	640 min +47%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh	443 min +2%
Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	436 min

Za

+ wyświetlacz OLED 4K o proporcjach 16:10

+ Pokrycie DCI-P3

+ stosunkowo niewielka waga

+ stabilna metalowa obudowa

+ 2 gniazda na dyski SSD

+ Możliwość rozbudowy pamięci RAM

+ Power Delivery

Przeciw

- wydajność GPU znacznie poniżej średniej

- odblaskowa powierzchnia wyświetlacza

- brak USB 4/Thunderbolt 4

- brak czytnika kart SD

- nieoptymalne zużycie energii w trybie bezczynności

- mocno się nagrzewa pod obciążeniem

- drogi

Werdykt - Nie jest to dobrze zaokrąglona sprawa

Medion S10 OLED, dostarczony przez firmę Medion.

S10 może pochwalić się panelem OLED (4k, DCI-P3, 16 cali, 16:10), dwoma slotami SSD, modułową pamięcią RAM, elegancką i kompaktową metalową obudową, a także dwoma portami USB-C (Power Delivery, DP Alt-Mode). Aktualny procesor Meteor Lake zapewnia oczekiwany poziom wydajności. Co więcej, laptop nie waży zbyt wiele.

Koncepcja Medion S10 OLED jest zastanawiająca. Niby jest to laptop multimedialny, ale właśnie to jest jego słabą stroną.

Jego Arc iGPU działa znacznie poniżej swoich możliwości - w rezultacie multimedialny aspekt tego laptopa jest zanegowany. Ponieważ Medion nie zainstalował USB 4/Thunderbolt 4, nie ma nawet opcji zrekompensowania tego poprzez podłączenie zewnętrznego GPU - laptop posiada tylko wolne porty USB 3.2 Gen 1.

Pomimo obniżonej wydajności, czasami staje się głośniejszy i gorętszy niż konkurencja. To samo można powiedzieć o zużyciu energii w trybie bezczynności. Laptop Medion ma również wadę, jeśli chodzi o czas pracy. Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, wady te nie powinny występować w laptopie kosztującym 1400 USD.

Alternatywą może być Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9. Oferuje on większą moc obliczeniową, znacznie lepsze czasy pracy i port USB-4. Jego pamięć RAM jest przylutowana i nie można jej wymienić - ale to samo można powiedzieć o większości konkurencji.

Cena i dostępność

Cena MRSP Medion S10 OLED wynosi około 1400 USD. W chwili pisania tego tekstu laptop nie jest dostępny do zakupu online w Stanach Zjednoczonych.

Prosimy pamiętać: Niedawno zaktualizowaliśmy nasz system oceny i wyniki wersji 8 nie są porównywalne z wynikami wersji 7. Więcej informacji znajdą Państwo tutaj.

Medion S10 OLED - 29/07/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

Wykonanie

83 / 98 → 85%

Klawiatura

79%

Myszka

83%

Komunikacja

59 / 80 → 74%

Waga

68 / 20-74 → 89%

Akumulator

76 / 95 → 80%

Wyświetlacz

82%

Wydajność w grach

34 / 88 → 39%

Wydajność w programach użytkowych

83 / 92 → 90%

AI Performance

72%

Temperatura

83%

Hałas

79 / 95 → 83%

Głośniki

83%

Kamerka

40 / 75 → 53%

Średnio

59%

77%

Multimedia - Ważona średnia

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
77.6%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 33.3%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 350 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Laptopy > Recenzja Medion S10 OLED: Multimedialny laptop z panelem OLED i procesorem Core Ultra 7

Sascha Mölck, 2024-07-31 (Update: 2024-07-31)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit porównanie
HP Pavilion 11-n070eg x360 (min) N2820, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	46
...
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2366
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2380
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2382
Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2383
Medion Erazer Major X10 i7-12700H, A730M	2384
Medion S17431-MD62640 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2384
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	2388
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

Recenzja Medion S10 OLED: Multimedialny laptop z panelem OLED i procesorem Core Ultra 7

Robi to powoli.

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Obudowa i łączność - Brak USB 4 dla S10

Porównanie rozmiarów

Zrównoważony rozwój

Urządzenia wejściowe - S10 ma podświetlane klawisze

Wyświetlacz - OLED, DCI-P3, 16:10

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Wydajność - Meteor Lake czasami działa powoli

Warunki testowania

Procesor

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Wydajność systemu

Opóźnienia DPC

Urządzenia pamięci masowej

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Karta graficzna

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Emisje i moc - Słabe wartości

Emisja hałasu

Temperatura

Głośniki

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

Zużycie energii

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

Czas trwania

Za

Przeciw

Werdykt - Nie jest to dobrze zaokrąglona sprawa

Cena i dostępność

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison

3DMark 11 porównanie
Asus Eee PC 1015B (min) C-50, Radeon HD 6250	187
...
Acer Predator 17 NX.QK4EP.022 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	9424
Hyperbook G6 Cobra Edition 4720HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	9481
MSI GS60 6QE-046XPL 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	9512
Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9522
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M	9538
Clevo P751ZM 4790T, GeForce GTX 970M	9540
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M	9564
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609