Recenzja laptopa HP Omen 16: Dobry wybór dla graczy nawet z Zen 4

Name: HP Omen 16-xf0376ng
Brand: HP

Udany pakiet ogólny.

Seria Omen od HP jest obecna na rynku już od kilku lat. Producent łączy sprzęt AMD i Nvidia w obecnym 16-calowym modelu xf0376ng. Czy i jak dobrze ta mieszanka współgra ze sobą, dowiecie się z naszej recenzji.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (tłumaczenie DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 19/09/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Zen 4

Omen 16-xf0376ng jest obecnie dostępny za niecałe 1900 euro (~2026 USD). Za tę cenę kupujący otrzymują najnowocześniejszy procesor Zen 4 od AMD: Ryzen 7 7840HS Ryzen 7 7840HS oferuje nie tylko wysoką wydajność procesora, ale także kartę graficzną Radeon 780M ma również całkiem szybkie iGPU. Jednak wymagającymi obliczeniami graficznymi zajmuje się karta GeForce RTX 4070 od Nvidii. Akcelerator Ada-Lovelace plasuje się bardziej w wyższej klasie średniej niż w segmencie high-end ze względu na nieco skromną pamięć wideo (tylko 8 GB GDDR6). Dysk SSD M.2 również mógłby być większy, biorąc pod uwagę tylko 512 GB pojemności. Jednak 16 GB pamięci RAM DDR5-5600 jest nadal odpowiednie dla notebooka do gier z 2023 roku. Wyświetlacz to matowy panel IPS o przekątnej 16,1 cala, rozdzielczości 1920 x 1080 pikseli i odświeżaniu 165 Hz.

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng (Omen 16 Rodzina)

Procesor

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Karta grafiki

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, rdzeń: 1980 MHz, pamięć: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 529.04, Optimus

Pamięć

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM

Matryca

16.10 cali 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pikseli 137 PPI, BOE0B81, IPS, Full-HD, refleksująca: nie, 165 Hz

Chipset

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Dysk twardy

WDC PC SN810 512GB, 512 GB

, NVMe-SSD

Karta dźwiękowa

Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.7 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller

Złącza

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, gniazda audio: Combo (Headset/Mic)

Łączność

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8852CE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Gabaryty

wysokość x szerokość x głębokość (mm): 23.5 x 369 x 259

Akumulator

83 Wh litowo-polimerowy, 6 cells

System operacyjny

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

kamerka: 2 MP 1080p FHD

Inne

głośniki: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, klawiatura: Chiclet RGB, podświetlanie klawiatury: tak, 280 W Power Supply, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 miesiące(y) gwarancji

Waga

2.44 kg, zasilacz: 693 g

Cena

1900 EUR

Odnośniki

HP strona producenta

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

pełna specyfikacja

Konkurentami Omen 16 są inne 16-calowe karty graficzne z RTX 4070, takie jak MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VGi Gigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSFi Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 oraz Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8które jednak kosztują więcej.

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	09/2023	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	23.5 mm	16.10"	1920x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	07/2023	HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	23.6 mm	16.10"	2560x1440
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	07/2023	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	03/2023	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	18 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Ponieważ obudowa jest w dużej mierze identyczna z już przetestowanym modelem 16-wf000 z Core i7-13700HX i GeForce RTX 4080 (wersja AMD niestety musi obejść się bez Thunderbolt 4), oszczędzimy sobie ponownej analizy obudowy, wyposażenia i urządzeń wejściowych w tym artykule i odniesiemy się w tym miejscu do istniejącego Raport z testów.

Porównanie rozmiarów

HP Omen 16-wf000 HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF DIN A4 ❌

Komunikacja

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1679 (1470^min - 1802^max) MBit/s +27%
Average Realtek 8852CE (1326 - 1824, n=3)	1508 MBit/s +14%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE	1326 (976^min - 1449^max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1325 (977^min - 1480^max) MBit/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1173 (839^min - 1366^max) MBit/s -12%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1115 (765^min - 1228^max) MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1725 (1685^min - 1740^max) MBit/s +16%
Average Realtek 8852CE (1481 - 1750, n=3)	1651 MBit/s +11%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE	1481 (741^min - 1496^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1438 (767^min - 1513^max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1364 (675^min - 1404^max) MBit/s -8%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1295 (1173^min - 1347^max) MBit/s -13%

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1326 (976-1449)

HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1115 (765-1228)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (977-1480)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1456 (741-1496)

HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (1173-1347)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (675-1404)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Kamera internetowa

ColorChecker HP Omen 16-xf0376ng: 6.43 ∆E min: 2.4 - max: 11.77 ∆E

Wyświetlacz

Podczas gdy recenzowana przez nas wersja Intela opiera się na wyświetlaczu QHD (2560 x 1440 pikseli), wariant AMD wykorzystuje klasyczny panel Full HD.


340 cd/m²	330 cd/m²	323 cd/m²
354 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	330 cd/m²
349 cd/m²	326 cd/m²	342 cd/m²

podświetlenie ekranu

BOE0B81 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

maksimum: 354 cd/m² (Nits) średnia: 338.2 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
rozświetlenie: 91 %
na akumulatorze: 350 cd/m²
kontrast: 1000:1 (czerń: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.23
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.131

Download Plik ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng BOE0B81, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"	HP Omen 16-wf000 BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-2%	17%	24%	-3%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	72.1	69 -4%	96.4 34%	99.9 39%	67.9 -6%	70.4 -2%
sRGB Coverage	99.6	99.2 0%	99.7 0%	100 0%	99.1 -1%	99.6 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	72.3	71.2 -2%	84.8 17%	96.4 33%	69.9 -3%	72.6 0%
Response Times		14%	43%	78%	21%	9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	12.3 ?(5.9, 6.4)	4.6 ?(2.1, 2.5) 63%	4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2) 64%	2 ?(1, 1) 84%	11 ?(5, 6) 11%	7 ?(3.2, 3.8) 43%
Response Time Black / White *	7.2 ?(4, 3.2)	9.7 ?(4.6, 5.1) -35%	5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4) 22%	1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48) 72%	5 ?(2, 3) 31%	9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2) -26%
PWM Frequency				60
Screen		16%	-0%	164%	30%	33%
Brightness middle	350	310.9 -11%	424 21%	389.97 11%	520 49%	355.3 2%
Brightness	338	296 -12%	411 22%	395 17%	494 46%	340 1%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	88 -3%	97 7%	91 0%	91 0%
Black Level *	0.35	0.35 -0%	0.37 -6%	0.03 91%	0.39 -11%	0.32 9%
Contrast	1000	888 -11%	1146 15%	12999 1200%	1333 33%	1110 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.29	2.18 34%	3.04 8%	2 39%	1.94 41%	1.13 66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.47	3.58 58%	7.5 11%	4.1 52%	5.62 34%	2.78 67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.23	0.52 77%	3.04 -36%	1.68 25%	0.74 67%	0.32 86%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.2	2.8 12%	4.34 -36%	2.23 30%	2.94 8%	1.4 56%
Gamma	2.131 ^103%	2.18 ^101%	2.32 ^95%	2.41 ^91%	2.37 ^93%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6317 ^103%	6002 ^108%	6952 ^93%	6323 ^103%	6443 ^101%	6372 ^102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		9% / 12%	20% / 10%	89% / 121%	16% / 21%	14% / 22%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Określone wartości obrazu są jednak podobne. Oba modele mogą pokryć prawie 100% przestrzeni kolorów sRGB i około 70% przestrzeni kolorów AdobeRGB i DCI-P3, chociaż niektórzy konkurenci (MSI, Gigabyte) osiągają tutaj lepsze wyniki. Czas reakcji również nie jest zły i powinien zaspokoić większość wymagań.

CalMAN: Nasycenie kolorów (skalibrowane)

Podświetlenie (91%) i wartość czerni (0,35 cd/m²) są całkowicie takie same, ale edycja AMD ma nieco lepszy kontrast (1000:1 vs 888:1) ze względu na nieco wyższą jasność (średnio 338 zamiast 296 cd/m²). Oba urządzenia nie są jednak w stanie dorównać konkurencji. Przede wszystkim panel OLED w Aero 16 ustępuje w wielu dziedzinach, o ile można pogodzić się z błyszczącą powierzchnią i migotaniem wyświetlacza.

Wracając jednak do Omena 16: kąty widzenia są dobre, typowe dla IPS, więc obraz pozostaje dość stabilny nawet z pochylonej pozycji. Nawiasem mówiąc, jeśli potrzebujesz możliwie najdokładniejszych kolorów, powinieneś przeprowadzić kalibrację lub pobrać i użyć pliku ICC, który połączyliśmy obok grafiki podświetlenia (zakładając, że jest to ten sam panel Full HD).

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.9 ms rise
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Moc

Omen 16 jest dostępny w wielu różnych konfiguracjach. Paleta sięga od GeForce RTX 4050 aż do GeForce RTX 4080. Jak już wspomniano, HP wykorzystuje aktualne modele procesorów od AMD i Intela. Nasz egzemplarz testowy plasuje się w (górnej) połowie stawki pod względem ceny i wydajności.

Warunki testowe

Jak przystało na notebooka gamingowego, producent dołącza do komputera rozbudowane oprogramowanie systemowe i tuningowe. W Omen Gaming Hub można między innymi dostosować podświetlenie klawiatury, przełączanie grafiki (hybrydowa lub osobna) oraz profil wydajności (patrz zrzuty ekranu). Ponieważ poziom hałasu podczas korzystania z trybu wydajności jest nieproporcjonalny do (nieco) lepszej wydajności 3D, a urządzenie jest już dość obecne w trybie bezczynności, wszystkie pomiary przeprowadziliśmy w trybie "Zrównoważonym". Istnieje również tryb "Eco", ale jest on bardzo podobny do testowanego ustawienia pod względem wydajności i emisji.

Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra)	Eco	Zrównoważony	Wydajność
Liczba klatek na sekundę	~110 fps	~112 fps	~120 fps
Hałas	~44 dB(A)	~44 dB(A)	~55 dB(A)

Procesor

Ryzen 7 7840HS pochodzi z generacji AMD Phoenix i dysponuje 16 MB pamięci podręcznej L3, maksymalnym taktowaniem 5,1 GHz i 8 rdzeniami, które dzięki technologii SMT mogą równolegle obsługiwać do 16 wątków. Model 4 nm plasuje się pośrodku pola benchmarków pomiędzy Ryzen 7 7735HS z Acer Nitro 16 (wciąż oparty na Zen 3+) i Ryzen 7 7745HX z Lenovo Legion Pro 5. Komputer na Core i7-13700H(X) są zazwyczaj nieco szybsze. To samo dotyczy Core i9-13900H w Gigabyte Aero 16. Przede wszystkim musimy pochwalić stałą wydajność. W naszej pętli Cinebench, Ryzen 7 7840HS również zapewnił bardzo podobne wskaźniki na dłuższą metę.

Cinebench R15 Multi-Endurance test

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2531 (2518.1-2561.97)

HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2742 (2466.4-3007.52)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-wf000 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700HX	81.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	80.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	78.8 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	74.8 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	70.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	70.8 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	69.1 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	59.6 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +34%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20051 (17276.1^min - 20051.4^max) Points +24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	20034 Points +24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	19188 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	18060 (17729.5^min - 18059.9^max) Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (15515 - 17214, n=17)	16414 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	16188 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points -13%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1862 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1854 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	1846 Points +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1785 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1718 - 1812, n=17)	1768 Points -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1707 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points -13%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +32%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	7692 Points +24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	7674 Points +23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	7254 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7072 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6061 - 6744, n=17)	6414 Points +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6224 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points -12%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +4%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	720 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	717 Points +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	693 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (661 - 705, n=17)	686 Points -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	651 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points -13%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +32%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3008 (2466.4^min - 3007.52^max) Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2978 (2861.03^min - 2977.96^max) Points +16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	2963 (2772.58^min - 2962.96^max) Points +16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	2854 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2473 - 2729, n=17)	2598 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2562 (2518.1^min - 2561.97^max) Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points -9%
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	294 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (270 - 286, n=17)	278 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	273 Points -2%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	264 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points -12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	243 Points -13%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (185 - 229, n=18)	198.6 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	198 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	174 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	172 Seconds * +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	169 Seconds * +15%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +23%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	77963 MIPS +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	76344 MIPS +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	75557 MIPS +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	74386 MIPS +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (59538 - 73035, n=18)	69127 MIPS +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	68646 MIPS
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS -11%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7244 MIPS +9%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6640 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6049 - 6754, n=18)	6561 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	6125 MIPS -8%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5967 MIPS -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	5570 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14942 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	13796 Points +21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	13239 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12378 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8446 - 12339, n=20)	11674 Points +2%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11414 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points -15%
Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2040 Points +2%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2005 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1837 - 2017, n=20)	1966 Points -2%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1886 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1829 Points -9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1718 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points -22%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	23.2 fps +17%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	21.1 fps +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	21 fps +6%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.8 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (11.7 - 21.8, n=18)	19.8 fps 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	19.7 fps -1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps -12%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	65.1 s *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	57.8 s * +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	54.6 s * +16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (38.3 - 68.3, n=18)	48.6 s * +25%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +27%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	45.5 s * +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	37.9 s * +42%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * -15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4934 sec * -15%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.4562 sec * -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4498 sec * -4%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=18)	0.4394 sec * -2%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4309 sec *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	0.421 sec * +2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2562 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

176 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

280 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6224 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

693 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1785 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16188 Points

Pomoc

... porównanie

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	89.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	84.9 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.1 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77.9 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76.8 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29656 KRay/s +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=19)	26587 KRay/s +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25896 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s -16%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	18571 KRay/s -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	18385 KRay/s -29%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17934 KRay/s -31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120974 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=19)	113567 Points +4%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109633 Points
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	96771 Points -12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90834 Points -17%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81656 Points -26%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4974 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5155, n=19)	4797 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4602 MB/s
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	4246 MB/s -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4187 MB/s -9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4080 MB/s -11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126954 Points +8%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117257 Points
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 125820, n=19)	116128 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105597 Points -10%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	105112 Points -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95175 Points -19%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15887 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15036 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13857 - 15525, n=19)	14941 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points -13%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	11920 Points -21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11050 Points -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10485 Points -30%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64255 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=19)	60589 Points +4%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58454 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points -9%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	46560 Points -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44967 Points -23%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44154 Points -24%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149377 MB/s +122%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=19)	132175 MB/s +96%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +62%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89847 MB/s +33%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81504 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71191 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67389 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +27%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1291 MB/s +22%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1192 MB/s +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1147 MB/s +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=19)	1065 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1062 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1032 MB/s -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15975 KRay/s +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=19)	14270 KRay/s +4%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13731 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s -15%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	10061 KRay/s -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9803 KRay/s -29%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9680 KRay/s -30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46114 MPixel/s +38%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44611 MPixel/s +34%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	41824 MPixel/s +25%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41516, n=19)	37735 MPixel/s +13%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33395 MPixel/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28499 MPixel/s -15%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -17%

Wydajność systemu

Pod względem wydajności systemu, Omen 16 zajmuje drugie miejsce wśród porównywanych urządzeń, tuż za Lenovo Legion Pro 5. Podczas gdy inni producenci dają swoim notebookom do gier tylko DDR5-4,800 RAM, HP daje swojemu 16-calowcowi DDR5-5,600 RAM.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8206 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8167 - 8183, n=2)	8175 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	8167 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8058 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	7814 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7329 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11332 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	11250 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10934 - 11250, n=2)	11092 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11074 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points -6%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	10522 Points -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10491 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10179 - 10526, n=2)	10353 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10235 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	10179 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9376 Points -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9231 Points -9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points -10%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9125 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	13575 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	13487 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13229 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12908 - 12920, n=2)	12914 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	12908 Points
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10860 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2027 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1882 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1789 Points
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1707 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1694 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1781 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1705 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1629 Points
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1570 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2222 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1978 Points
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1978 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1936 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1862 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1915 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1785 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1635 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1435 Points
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1407 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points

PCMark 10 Score		8167 pkt.
Pomoc

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69289 MB/s +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66344 MB/s +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=19)	66323 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	63327 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62231 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50007 MB/s -20%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73950 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68252 MB/s +12%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	67404 MB/s +10%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61147 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 62147, n=19)	58070 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50703 MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=19)	84045 MB/s +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78406 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71464 MB/s -9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68170 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -15%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	66324 MB/s -15%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54587 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.4 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=19)	92.4 ns * -3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.8 ns *
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * +2%
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87.1 ns * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns * +4%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Opóźnienia DPC

Jak to często bywa, opóźnienia dają powody do narzekań. Według narzędzia LatencyMon, laptop nie nadaje się do zadań wrażliwych na opóźnienia, takich jak edycja audio i wideo w czasie rzeczywistym.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	18226.8 μs * -734%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2645.9 μs * -21%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	2185.9 μs *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * +40%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1053.8 μs * +52%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	603 μs * +72%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Pamięć masowa

Dysk SSD jest dość mało spektakularny. Zainstalowany model 512 GB od WDC osiąga więcej niż solidne prędkości i poza drobnymi wahaniami (porównaj pętlę DiskSpd) również stabilną wydajność długoterminową, ale Omen 16 nie może konkurować z dyskami SSD konkurencji w benchmarku AS SSD, różnica w wydajności rzadko zauważana w codziennym użytkowaniu.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WDC PC SN810 512GB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6893 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4424 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 669.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 535.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3546 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3752 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.57 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.3 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	86.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	81.3 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	74.2 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	70.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	69.3 pt
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB	65.7 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	62.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4677 (4664.17^min - 4676.56^max) MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4427 (4395.42^min - 4426.62^max) MB/s +25%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (3550 - 4103, n=6)	3786 MB/s +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	3550 (3505.51^min - 3549.67^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3520 (3490.23^min - 3519.95^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3349 (938.07^min - 3349.15^max) MB/s -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2519 MB/s -29%
seq write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4485 (775.32^min - 4484.81^max) MB/s +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4326 (4313.21^min - 4326.48^max) MB/s +14%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (3470 - 4396, n=6)	3883 MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	3783 (3552.81^min - 3782.83^max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3627 (3368.21^min - 3627.15^max) MB/s -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3291 (3216.4^min - 3290.77^max) MB/s -13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2220 (2186.31^min - 2219.63^max) MB/s -41%
seq q8 t1 read
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	7132 (6103.13^min - 7132.42^max) MB/s +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6935 (5510.15^min - 6934.86^max) MB/s +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	6889 (5972.9^min - 6888.72^max) MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (6656 - 6889, n=6)	6781 MB/s -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6037.07^min - 6660.97^max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6660 (6017.57^min - 6659.93^max) MB/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6460 (6020.84^min - 6459.94^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -8%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5993 (5971.65^min - 5992.64^max) MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4926^min - 4942.6^max) MB/s +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4926 (4833.5^min - 4926^max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4803 (4344.79^min - 4802.73^max) MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	4459 (4352.43^min - 4459.27^max) MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (4342 - 4468, n=6)	4417 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2216 (2187.96^min - 2215.64^max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.1 (78.57^min - 80.12^max) MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	70.4 (69.85^min - 70.35^max) MB/s +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.9 (64.79^min - 67.93^max) MB/s +3%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (54.4 - 80.3, n=6)	67.5 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	66.9 (50.9^min - 66.86^max) MB/s +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	66.1 (65.3^min - 66.08^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.4 (47.92^min - 48.42^max) MB/s -27%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	313 (306.34^min - 313.21^max) MB/s +102%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	253 (250.9^min - 252.85^max) MB/s +63%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	244 (243^min - 243.65^max) MB/s +57%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +43%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (149.5 - 291, n=6)	211 MB/s +36%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	175.8 (171.76^min - 175.78^max) MB/s +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	159.6 (158.36^min - 159.58^max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	155.1 (147.48^min - 155.14^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4166.98^min - 4173.4^max) MB/s +243%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3523 (3416.03^min - 3522.69^max) MB/s +189%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3311 (3243.78^min - 3311.19^max) MB/s +172%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3013 (755.04^min - 3013.06^max) MB/s +148%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +110%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (540 - 3318, n=6)	1688 MB/s +39%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	1217 (1195.73^min - 1216.61^max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	956 (930.59^min - 955.89^max) MB/s -21%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3597 (3488.54^min - 3597.4^max) MB/s +640%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3552 (3546.24^min - 3551.63^max) MB/s +631%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 (1172^min - 2736.15^max) MB/s +463%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2193 (2174.06^min - 2193.44^max) MB/s +351%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +332%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (415 - 2716, n=6)	1222 MB/s +151%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	549 (523.52^min - 549.32^max) MB/s +13%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	486 (470.43^min - 486.44^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8963 Points +70%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8452 Points +61%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7774 Points +48%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6766 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +28%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (4388 - 7323, n=6)	5768 Points +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	5636 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	5262 Points
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3449 Points +111%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3174 Points +94%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2959 Points +81%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points +49%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (1374 - 2763, n=6)	1977 Points +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1805 Points +10%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	1638 Points
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1564 Points -5%
Score Write
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4488 Points +56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3832 Points +33%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3723 Points +29%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3331 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3012 Points +4%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	2885 Points
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (2415 - 3190, n=6)	2851 Points -1%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5621.18 MB/s +11%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5479.27 MB/s +8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185.49 MB/s +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5126 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	5080.22 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -3%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (3232 - 5412, n=6)	4735 MB/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4582 MB/s -10%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4546 MB/s +61%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4010.3 MB/s +42%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3900.46 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3437.81 MB/s +22%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (2395 - 4120, n=6)	3044 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	2824.64 MB/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2310 MB/s -18%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.46 MB/s +12%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (65.4 - 76.3, n=6)	72.1 MB/s +10%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	67.91 MB/s +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.7 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	65.35 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	62.76 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	61.3 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	288 MB/s +48%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (194.8 - 271, n=6)	230 MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	229.62 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.54 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	207 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	194.78 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	137.9 MB/s -29%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2813.87 MB/s +164%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2593.07 MB/s +144%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2378 MB/s +123%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s +76%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (794 - 2265, n=6)	1431 MB/s +34%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1285 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	1064.22 MB/s
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	948.37 MB/s -11%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3914.27 MB/s +63%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3219.74 MB/s +34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3195.33 MB/s +33%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2669 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2493 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	2408.24 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (1904 - 2560, n=6)	2317 MB/s -4%
Access Time Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.079 ms * -55%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (0.03 - 0.086, n=6)	0.06233 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * -8%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	0.051 ms *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.041 ms * +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * +39%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.027 ms * +47%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.022 ms * +57%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.064 ms * -237%
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.054 ms * -184%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -155%
Average WDC PC SN810 512GB (0.017 - 0.053, n=6)	0.03817 ms * -101%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -53%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.02 ms * -5%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	0.019 ms *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.013 ms * +32%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB: Ø6732 (5625.82-6897.16)

HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø7111 (6514.78-7131.37)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH: Ø1946 (1623.72-6448.85)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6590 (6239.87-6954.51)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3831 (253.34-6627.38)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

Karta graficzna

Karta GeForce RTX 4070 nie wykazuje żadnych słabości w syntetycznych testach porównawczych. Według naszej oceny wydajności, prędkość jest nieco wyższa niż wcześniej ustalona średnia RTX 4070. Nic dziwnego, skoro HP przyznaje modelowi Ada-Lovelace maksymalne 140 W TGP. To, czy dopłata do RTX 4080 jest tego warta, zależy od użytkownika: Omen 16-wf000 sprintuje prawie 40% obok 16-xf0376ng w 3DMarks. Dzięki 12 GB pamięci VRAM GDDR6, która nie jest szczególnie duża, RTX 4080 jest bardziej przyszłościowy.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Average of class Gaming	78.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74.2 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.8 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.2 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	56145 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42142 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41480 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41302 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41090 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	40995 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=59)	40410 Points -4%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	38663 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	31698 Points
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30936 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30051 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29853 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=62)	29041 Points -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28885 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	17339 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12617 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11955 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11907 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11868 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11798 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=60)	11603 Points -3%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	10777 Points +50%
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)	8661 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7649 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7200 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7161 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7141 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7131 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (3761 - 8041, n=40)	7050 Points -2%

3DMark 11 Performance		34584 pkt.
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		189312 pkt.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		66071 pkt.
3DMark Fire Strike Score		27559 pkt.
3DMark Time Spy Score		11726 pkt.
Pomoc

... porównanie

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24 Seconds * -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=60)	21.5 Seconds * -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21 Seconds * -0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	21 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	21 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	19 Seconds * +10%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	17 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=63)	40.6 Seconds * -16%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds * -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	35 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35 Seconds *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	34 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	33 Seconds * +6%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	22 Seconds * +37%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Wydajność w grach

Zgodnie z oczekiwaniami, karta GeForce RTX 4070 okazuje się być dobrą podstawą dla panelu Full HD. 1920 x 1080 pikseli i maksymalne detale nie stanowią problemu dla większości gier. Tylko bardzo obciążające procesor lub słabo zaprogramowane/zoptymalizowane tytuły, takie jak Immortals of Aveum lub A Plague Tale Requiem są odpalane z mniej niż 60 FPS.

Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX	96.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	87.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	82.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	81.9 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	81.6 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	72.7 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	68.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX	163.4 (140^min) fps +46%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.8 (114^min) fps +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	119 fps +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	113.2 (98^min) fps +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	112 fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	123.2 (3.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 (3.81^min, 76.9^P1) fps +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	119.7 (4.54^min, 76.9^P1) fps +13%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX	114 (5.05^min, 76.9^P1) fps +8%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	105.9 (19.5^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	97.4 (36.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps -8%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX	153.9 fps +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 fps +10%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	116.2 fps +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	115 fps +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	109.1 fps 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	108.7 fps

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX	299 (25.7^min, 217^P1) fps +57%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	223 (89^min, 167.8^P1) fps +17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	204 (39^min, 153.9^P1) fps +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	200 (31.2^min, 147.4^P1) fps +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	192.6 (25.1^min, 144.3^P1) fps +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	190.3 (22.4^min, 141.8^P1) fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	182 (152.8^min) fps +32%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	154.7 (131.1^min) fps +12%
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX	153.7 (133.3^min) fps +12%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	144.5 (123.6^min) fps +5%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	137.8 (120.3^min) fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	114.8 (97.8^min) fps -17%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX	118.5 fps +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	117.8 fps +39%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	115.3 fps +36%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	110.2 fps +30%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps +26%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	84.8 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	76.3 fps -10%

Immortals of Aveum | Armored Core 6 | Atlas Fallen | Sons of the Forest | A Plague Tale Requiem

Immortals of Aveum - 1920x1080 Ultra AF:16x
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	49.9 (17.2^min, 19.5^P0.1, 26.5^P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (46.1 - 49.9, n=4)	47.5 fps +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	46.9 (7.47^min, 13.1^P0.1, 29.9^P1) fps 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	46.9 (9.42^min, 11^P0.1, 21.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (14.9 - 106.3, n=10, last 2 years)	46.1 fps -2%

Armored Core 6 - 1920x1080 Maximum Preset
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	107 (52.8^min, 64^P0.1, 78.6^P1) fps
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	106.4 (37.5^min, 50^P0.1, 79.5^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (87.2 - 107, n=4)	99.4 fps -7%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	87.2 (30.4^min, 55.8^P0.1, 64^P1) fps -19%
Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 107, n=14, last 2 years)	71 fps -34%

Atlas Fallen - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	111.1 (21.6^min, 27.8^P0.1, 46.4^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (105.3 - 111.1, n=4)	107.3 fps -3%
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	106.1 (32.5^min, 50^P0.1, 71.6^P1) fps -5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	105.3 (34.2^min, 41.1^P0.1, 63^P1) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (9.8 - 161, n=13, last 2 years)	83.5 fps -25%

Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	85.4 (54.8^min, 64.6^P0.1, 72.6^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (71.1 - 87.5, n=4)	81.6 fps -4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	71.1 (53.6^min, 58.4^P0.1, 60.7^P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)	68.8 fps -19%

A Plague Tale Requiem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (38 - 96.8, n=12, last 2 years)	60.6 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54.9 - 57.5, n=2)	56.2 fps +2%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	54.9 (22.8^min, 27^P0.1, 43.3^P1) fps

Przetestowaliśmy wydajność w grach po około 60 minutach (FHD/Ultra) Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra). Nie zaobserwowaliśmy żadnych spadków liczby klatek na sekundę ani innych niespójności.

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø106.6 (94-113)

HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø163.4 (153-172)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø117.1 (108-122)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.3 (107-120)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø111.1 (107-116)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)		177.7	166.8	105.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)				112
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	164.1	149.2	144.1	137.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		141.1	108.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	121	103.8	84.8
Strange Brigade (2018)		277	221	190.3
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)		67.2	58.9	54.9
Sons of the Forest (2023)		88.1	85.8	85.4
Atlas Fallen (2023)		143.1	132.4	111.1
Immortals of Aveum (2023)			57.3	46.9
Armored Core 6 (2023)		110.1	109.4	107

Emisje

Emisja hałasu

Podczas gdy Omen 16 osiąga bardzo głośne ~55 dB(A) podczas grania w trybie wydajności, rozwój hałasu jest utrzymywany w granicach w trybie zrównoważonym. 44 dB(A) to w żadnym wypadku nie jest cichy poziom, ale akceptowalny w świetle danej wydajności. W sytuacjach bezczynności wentylatory są czasami całkowicie wyłączone. Przez większość czasu pracują na całkiem przyzwoitym poziomie, który jak na nasz gust mógłby być nawet niższy - konkurencja często radzi sobie tutaj lepiej.

Hałas

luz		25 / 29 / 32 dB
obciążenie		44 / 46 dB

	30 dB cichy 40 dB(A) słyszalny 50 dB(A) irytujący
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (odległość 15 cm) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-7%	8%	-5%	1%	7%
off / environment *	24	23 4%	24 -0%	23 4%	25.7 -7%	23.2 3%
Idle Minimum *	25	29.6 -18%	24 4%	23 8%	25.7 -3%	23.2 7%
Idle Average *	29	29.8 -3%	24 17%	23 21%	25.7 11%	23.2 20%
Idle Maximum *	32	30.4 5%	24 25%	33.64 -5%	26.3 18%	26.2 18%
Load Average *	44	33.8 23%	34.81 21%	51.49 -17%	33.9 23%	31.4 29%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44	57 -30%	44.05 -0%	55.27 -26%		48.4 -10%
Load Maximum *	46	58.3 -27%	51.57 -12%	55.24 -20%	62 -35%	53.8 -17%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Temperatura

Laptop nagrzewa się w sytuacjach stresowych, szczególnie spód obudowy. Maksymalnie 57 °C (~135 °F) po godzinie gry w FurMark i Prime95 przemawia przeciwko sesjom grania na kolanach. Górna strona również robi się dość ciepła, osiągając maksymalnie 49 °C (~120 °F), ale ponieważ obszar podparcia dłoni zawsze pozostaje poniżej 40 °C (104 °F), wartość ta jest nadal w połowie akceptowalna. Niemniej jednak, Omen 16 pozostaje w tyle za konkurencją w tej kategorii - z wyjątkiem jeszcze cieplejszego MSI Stealth 16.

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


49 °C	49 °C	49 °C
44 °C	47 °C	45 °C
33 °C	37 °C	37 °C

maks. w ogóle: 49 °C
średnia: 43.3 °C


56 °C	57 °C	49 °C
51 °C	50 °C	46 °C
37 °C	33 °C	30 °C

maks. w ogóle: 57 °C
średnia: 45.4 °C

zasilacz 44 °C | temperatura otoczenia 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


31 °C	30 °C	29 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

maks. w ogóle: 31 °C
średnia: 28.7 °C


30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
31 °C	30 °C	30 °C
27 °C	27 °C	29 °C

maks. w ogóle: 31 °C
średnia: 29.4 °C

zasilacz 29 °C | temperatura otoczenia 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

w stresie

na luzie

Witcher 3


46 °C	48 °C	47 °C
44 °C	46 °C	44 °C
32 °C	36 °C	36 °C

maks. w ogóle: 48 °C
średnia: 42.1 °C


53 °C	53 °C	47 °C
50 °C	50 °C	47 °C
34 °C	34 °C	30 °C

maks. w ogóle: 53 °C
średnia: 44.2 °C

zasilacz 44 °C | temperatura otoczenia 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		9%	-19%	22%	3%	13%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	45 8%	60 -22%	41 16%	41.5 15%	41.8 15%
Maximum Bottom *	57	48.8 14%	61 -7%	47 18%	51.8 9%	41.4 27%
Idle Upper Side *	31	29.2 6%	38.2 -23%	23 26%	31.6 -2%	29 6%
Idle Bottom *	31	28.8 7%	37.7 -22%	23 26%	34.5 -11%	30.4 2%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Test warunków skrajnych

Nie trzeba obawiać się śmierci cieplnej podzespołów. Ryzen 7 7840HS dławi się do 3,3 GHz po dłuższym pełnym obciążeniu, ale około 82 °C (~180 °F) jest akceptowalne. Sytuacja jest porównywalna dla GeForce RTX 4070 z nieco poniżej 78 °C (~172 °F). Taktowanie rdzenia na poziomie około 1700 MHz nie daje powodów do krytyki.

Głośnik

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Zarządzanie energią

Zużycie energii

W kwestii zużycia energii również obyło się bez większych niespodzianek. 84 do maksymalnie 176 watów pod obciążeniem to nawet jak na tak potężnego notebooka stosunkowo niski wynik, który przemawia za wydajnością CPU i GPU. Dołączony do zestawu 280-watowy zasilacz nie jest nawet bliski wyczerpania. W trybie bezczynności Omen 16 zużywa tylko od 9 do 20 watów przy aktywnym przełączaniu grafiki - to umiarkowany wynik.

Pobór mocy

wyłączony / stan wstrzymania	0.1 / W
luz	9 / 14 / 20 W
obciążenie	84 / 176 W


Legenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-75%	-13%	-12%	-22%	-31%	-37%
Idle Minimum *	9	21.8 -142%	11 -22%	11.8 -31%	11.6 -29%	8.1 10%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -50%
Idle Average *	14	26 -86%	18 -29%	16.1 -15%	15.6 -11%	15.9 -14%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Maximum *	20	36 -80%	19 5%	17 15%	16.5 17%	37.2 -86%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -34%
Load Average *	84	115.5 -38%	91 -8%	100.6 -20%	155 -85%	90.9 -8%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -27%
Witcher 3 ultra *	140.9	214 -52%	130 8%	158 -12%	154.8 -10%	189.6 -35%
Load Maximum *	176	269.7 -53%	228 -30%	192 -9%	205 -16%	263.5 -50%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -41%

* ... im mniej tym lepiej

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø140.9 (128.2-145.2)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø150.8 (140.8-160.3)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.1 (8.75-20.1)

Energy consumption with external Monitor

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø86.6 (77.4-101.6)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø91.4 (89.7-103.1)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø133.4 (131.8-137.6)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø138.5 (132.9-144.6)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.5 (12.2-28.3)

Żywotność baterii

Żywotność baterii opiera się na wersji Intela, chociaż odpowiednik AMD działa nieco dłużej w naszym rzeczywistym teście WLAN przy zmniejszonej jasności do 150 cd/m² w widoku od 344 do 307 minut. Nieco poniżej 6 godzin to użyteczna wartość dla laptopa do gier, choć niektórzy rywale osiągają tu nawet więcej.

Wydajność akumulatora

WiFi Websurfing

5h 44min

	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Czasy pracy		-11%	35%	30%	57%	-30%	9%
WiFi v1.3	344	307 -11%	466 35%	448 30%	540 57%	240 -30%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 9%
Reader / Idle		328	661		729	392	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
Load		68	142	126	105	61	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
H.264			462	442	614		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Za

+ stałe dostarczanie mocy

+ umiarkowane zużycie energii

+ panel 165 Hz

Przeciw

- brak czytnika kart, brak USB 4

- skromna kamera internetowa

Wnioski

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng - urządzenie testowe dostarczone przez HP Niemcy

Omen 16 zapewnia dobrą wydajność dziękiRyzen 7 7840HS.

16-calowiec nie popełnia żadnych rażących błędów i uzyskuje co najmniej "zadowalający" wynik w prawie każdej kategorii.

Jest nawet wystarczająco dobry, aby uzyskać ocenę "Dobry" lub "Bardzo dobry" w większości kategorii, więc kończymy z przyzwoitą ogólną oceną 87% - podobnie jak wersja Intela.

Z pozytywów warto wspomnieć o stabilnej pracy ciągłej, szybkim wyświetlaczu 165 Hz, solidnych głośnikach i (przynajmniej w trybie zrównoważonym) akceptowalnej emisji hałasu. Nie polecalibyśmy trybu wydajności ze względu na głośny hałas (bez względu na to, czy jest bezczynny, czy obciążony).

HP mogłoby poprawić łączność (brak czytnika kart, brak USB 4), kamerę internetową i rozwój temperatury obudowy, która jest powyżej średniej.

Porównywalne RTX-4070 laptopy z procesorami AMD można znaleźć np. u Acer (Nitro 16) czy Lenovo (Legion Pro 5).

Cena i dostępność

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng z procesorem Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 i panelem 165 Hz był dostępny za niecałe 1900 euro (~2026 USD) w sklepach Saturn i Mediamarkt w czasie testów.

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng - 13/09/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Wykonanie

82 / 98 → 83%

Klawiatura

81%

Myszka

86%

Komunikacja

62 / 80 → 77%

Waga

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Akumulator

67 / 95 → 71%

Wyświetlacz

87%

Wydajność w grach

98%

Wydajność w programach użytkowych

96%

Temperatura

80 / 95 → 84%

Hałas

80 / 90 → 88%

Głośniki

80%

Kamerka

48 / 85 → 56%

Średnio

77%

87%

Gaming - Ważona średnia

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> laptopy testy i recenzje notebooki > Laptopy > Recenzja laptopa HP Omen 16: Dobry wybór dla graczy nawet z Zen 4

Florian Glaser, 2023-09-19 (Update: 2023-09-19)

Recenzja laptopa HP Omen 16: Dobry wybór dla graczy nawet z Zen 4

Udany pakiet ogólny.

Potencjalni konkurenci w porównaniu

Porównanie rozmiarów

Komunikacja

Kamera internetowa

Wyświetlacz

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Moc

Warunki testowe

Procesor

Cinebench R15 Multi-Endurance test

Wydajność systemu

Opóźnienia DPC

Pamięć masowa

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Karta graficzna

Wydajność w grach

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

Emisje

Emisja hałasu

Temperatura

Test warunków skrajnych

Głośnik

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis

Zarządzanie energią

Zużycie energii

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Energy consumption with external Monitor

Żywotność baterii

Za

Przeciw

Wnioski

Cena i dostępność

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison